finneh
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 7,318
When I say the UK I mean the UK by any normal democratic metric... Which is generally the group with the largest proportion of votes. That's how the direction of any democratic country is decided. If the UK votes for Corbyn whose policies I believe would be far more damaging to the UK economy than Brexit for example, he'd be prime minister and the country would go along with those policies.When you say the UK, who do you mean by the UK, the 17million out of 64million. The main issues that have been raised are immigration (surprise) , sovereignty (ridiculous), paying a tiny amount of money to stop losing a fortune.
Who is a loser, not me. This exercise for me is a study of how people can vote to make themselves far worse off by believing lies. It's fascinating.
The biggest losers will be the Brexiters who voted for this, only at the moment they think they've won, what they've won they can't tell us.
You seriously think any other nation would vote to leave the EU. Of course euroscepticism exists in all countries but like everything else not everyone agrees with everything.
The immigration is a total fallacy , even now the tune has changed, it's no longer immigrants they object to, supposedly but now it's different immigrants they want.
UKIP and BP exists because of Farage so it is totally relevant. He's a con-man and a parasite who use gullible people to feed him.
He doesn't even bother to say how much better the UK will be. Occasionally he'll rant on about unelected bureaucrats and
Sooner or later the UK will leave and then we'll see how much better off the UK will be.
Surely if life will be so much better, why do they need a deal, why are people told to stockpile essential foods and medecines, why is the UK government spending £100m on advertising, why are the UK paying ferry companies for additional space, it's not the space that's the problem, that exists already - the rest of the EU aren't - we don't need to. Someone, somewhere must know what these benefits are.
If the UK is worse off out of the EU after we've left, parties who want to rejoin will become more popular and will be voted in with a mandate to rejoin. That's democracy but of course for democracy to operate you have to honour a democratic result, find out if the country has made a collective wrong decision and if that occurs you correct that in the future. Do I believe Corbyn was a conman at the last election... Promising a swath of de facto bribes to buy as many votes as possible? Yes I do. However I have to believe that the country is collectively smart enough to see through this, which in truth they did as he didn't win. If they were "stupid" and voted Corbyn in I wouldn't be blaming social media and the unintelligent electorate, I'd be disappointed that the opposition weren't effective enough in countering his pie in the sky promises.
What's smart or dumb, sane or insane, logical or illogical is immaterial (and subjective of course).
Farage might be a conman or parasite, likewise Johnson, May, Corbyn, Sturgeon etc... In fact who was the last political leader who wasn't wholly substandard? However if he didn't exist then someone else would. He's merely the "best" man to fill the void. Farage didn't turn up in any recognisable capacity until 2006 bear in mind - two years after UKIP won 2.65m seats at the EU elections.