Bruno Fernandes image 8

Bruno Fernandes Portugal flag

2023-24 Performances


View full 2023-24 profile

5.3 Season Average Rating
Appearances
45
Goals
15
Assists
11
Yellow cards
11

soapythecat

Full Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2006
Messages
3,808
Location
Glasgow resident these days.
Come on Saudi, bail us out for a few players.
Bruno would fetch a good fee, probably one of the most sellable players at the club, yet the one who could easily be replaced.
First out of the door for me (Martial is gone anyway). Replace him and we improve instantly.Antony too.
 

#07

makes new threads with tweets in the OP
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
23,333

It'll be interesting to see what happens to our chance creation if Bruno does leave near term. Will we find a new way of playing that compensates? Or will we just go back to what we were when Ole took over and people figured out that we just weren't all that, especially without Pogba.
 

statpadder

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 24, 2023
Messages
127
It'll be interesting to see what happens to our chance creation if Bruno does leave near term. Will we find a new way of playing that compensates? Or will we just go back to what we were when Ole took over and people figured out that we just weren't all that, especially without Pogba.
I’ll tell you what will happen. We might start playing well as a team. Shocking? Isn’t it? God forbid, we might even start controlling the game and tempo.

Btw where do you find the “chances created” BS stat anyway? Because I believe every corner that gets a Utd head first is a big chance?
 

Pughnichi

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Messages
1,636

It'll be interesting to see what happens to our chance creation if Bruno does leave near term. Will we find a new way of playing that compensates? Or will we just go back to what we were when Ole took over and people figured out that we just weren't all that, especially without Pogba.
It’s common for a ‘star’ player to leave and the selling club start playing better as they stop obsessing about finding their main man.

happened through the years. Everton were relegation team when Rooney was there and improved after he was gone. The Ruud - Saha shift had us playing better. Tottenham improved at the start of this season without kane. Sure there’s countless more

we wouldn’t miss him
 

Based Adnan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
4,130
Moving Bruno on has to coincide with a change in approach towards a more proactive possession based style of play. Simply moving him on but playing the same style won't make us any better.
 

Scottynaldinho

Full Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Messages
1,285
It’s common for a ‘star’ player to leave and the selling club start playing better as they stop obsessing about finding their main man.

happened through the years. Everton were relegation team when Rooney was there and improved after he was gone. The Ruud - Saha shift had us playing better. Tottenham improved at the start of this season without kane. Sure there’s countless more

we wouldn’t miss him
Except that he's not the target man that his teammates are always trying to find. Just end this anti-Bruno agenda.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,073
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I’ll tell you what will happen. We might start playing well as a team. Shocking? Isn’t it? God forbid, we might even start controlling the game and tempo.

Btw where do you find the “chances created” BS stat anyway? Because I believe every corner that gets a Utd head first is a big chance?
:lol: Yeah, it’s obviously the potent attacking threat we pose at corners that’s making Bruno look good!
 

statpadder

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 24, 2023
Messages
127
:lol: Yeah, it’s obviously the potent attacking threat we pose at corners that’s making Bruno look good!
No no, it’s obviously correct and we’re all blind. And yeah, Bruno is creating big chances every game and Hoijland is starved of service at the same time. Excellent logic.

Maybe check out how these rubbish stats are calculated in the first place.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,073
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
No no, it’s obviously correct and we’re all blind. And yeah, Bruno is creating big chances every game and Hoijland is starved of service at the same time. Excellent logic.

Maybe check out how these rubbish stats are calculated in the first place.
You’re the expert. Enlighten me. You seem to have a much better grasp of how these stats are collated. Tell me more about all these corners landing on the head of Manchester United players.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,364

It'll be interesting to see what happens to our chance creation if Bruno does leave near term. Will we find a new way of playing that compensates? Or will we just go back to what we were when Ole took over and people figured out that we just weren't all that, especially without Pogba.
Do you want to hear something crazy?

United created better chances per game in 19/20 before Bruno came.
 

Scottynaldinho

Full Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Messages
1,285
Do you want to hear something crazy?

United created better chances per game in 19/20 before Bruno came.
Share the stats, please. Also, who was the best chance creator that season and how many chances did he create? How far ahead was he of the 2nd best chance creator?

Just sharing these stats will answer a lot for you.
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,949
Location
Sunny Manc
He’s obviously a good player. He’s a risk taker, but that isn’t automatically a bad thing. He shouldn’t be captain though. A captain should be the one who rallies the troops when we’re down, who leads by example. Bruno is more likely to throw in the towel and strop. He’s the kind of player who needs a strong captain to get him in line, the fact that he’s supposed to play that captain role is kind of comical.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,073
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
He’s obviously a good player. He’s a risk taker, but that isn’t automatically a bad thing. He shouldn’t be captain though. A captain should be the one who rallies the troops when we’re down, who leads by example. Bruno is more likely to throw in the towel and strop. He’s the kind of player who needs a strong captain to get him in line, the fact that he’s supposed to play that captain role is kind of comical.
I agree with this but we’ve ended up in a fecked up situation where there is no other, better candidate. Because anyone else who could potentially take the role is either not guaranteed a spot in our best XI, regularly injured, or both. I guess, maybe, Onana is the next best option?
 

Pughnichi

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2016
Messages
1,636
I agree with this but we’ve ended up in a fecked up situation where there is no other, better candidate. Because anyone else who could potentially take the role is either not guaranteed a spot in our best XI, regularly injured, or both. I guess, maybe, Onana is the next best option?
Martinez all day when he’s back
 

KikiDaKats

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2015
Messages
2,607
Location
Salford
Supports
His Liverpool supporting wife

It'll be interesting to see what happens to our chance creation if Bruno does leave near term. Will we find a new way of playing that compensates? Or will we just go back to what we were when Ole took over and people figured out that we just weren't all that, especially without Pogba.
Yep. The great title winning list of 2023. All that list shows is over reliance on an individual don’t necessarily equal a winning formula.
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,949
Location
Sunny Manc
I agree with this but we’ve ended up in a fecked up situation where there is no other, better candidate. Because anyone else who could potentially take the role is either not guaranteed a spot in our best XI, regularly injured, or both. I guess, maybe, Onana is the next best option?
True. And that’s probably one of the biggest problems we’ve had over the years, a lack of leaders on the pitch. The ones we have had, are usually old, injury prone, and well past their best. Its definitely one of the reasons why the players have habitually given up on managers so often and why we’ve had problems in the dressing room. A Keane figure would never have allowed that.
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,242
Location
Dublin

It'll be interesting to see what happens to our chance creation if Bruno does leave near term. Will we find a new way of playing that compensates? Or will we just go back to what we were when Ole took over and people figured out that we just weren't all that, especially without Pogba.
What a thoroughly underwhelming list of players. Strange that no successful sides have players on there.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,364
Share the stats, please. Also, who was the best chance creator that season and how many chances did he create? How far ahead was he of the 2nd best chance creator?

Just sharing these stats will answer a lot for you.
Why does it matter who was the best chance creator? I'm talking as a team in a specific reply to the point made about United before Bruno. United xG that season was better per game before Bruno's signing (1.66 vs 1.58)*. It's not much difference but that was with Pogba, Shaw, and Martial missing for months at the time. Our no.10 was either Pereira or Lingard. The team was underperforming in front of goal. Martial and Greenwood changed that in the 2nd half of the season.

With few deviations like LVG's 2nd season, United have been basically the same in terms of creating chances since Fergie retired. No one can guarantee that getting rid of Bruno will make the team create more chances but I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be worse.

The stats are from Fbref.
 

Scandi Red

Hates Music.
Joined
Sep 25, 2022
Messages
4,759
People need to learn that correlation does not equal causation. Just because there exists examples of good players leaving a team followed by said team winning more games, it does in no way prove that that one player was the problem all along.

Selling Bruno at the current stage of his career will always be the wrong decision unless he tries to stage a coup or something like that.
 

NZT-One

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2021
Messages
2,417
Location
Berlin
People need to learn that correlation does not equal causation. Just because there exists examples of good players leaving a team followed by said team winning more games, it does in no way prove that that one player was the problem all along.

Selling Bruno at the current stage of his career will always be the wrong decision unless he tries to stage a coup or something like that.
Yeah. You are so right. People really have to understand that.

And from what I understood, nobody was talking about him being "the problem". Topic was the fixation on chances created and key passes. And some "people" have to remind themselves, that it isn't individual stats that will bring us points. Its the teams output after all. And when having a player as great as some "people" proclaim he is, is still leading to us being behind teams with lesser players or at least without such a gem, the fixation on individual stats should, at the very least, be recognized as potentially problematic.

If only "people" would admit that to themselves from time to time.
 

Scandi Red

Hates Music.
Joined
Sep 25, 2022
Messages
4,759
And when having a player as great as some "people" proclaim he is, is still leading to us being behind teams with lesser players or at least without such a gem, the fixation on individual stats should, at the very least, be recognized as potentially problematic.
Or just act like a normal person and take positive stats for what they are: evidence of a player doing something well. No need to overcomplicate things. As funny as it is to laugh at the prospect of Bayern suddenly not winning trophies, only a fool would blame Kane.

Positive stats can never be negative. At the absolute worst they can be used to highlight how a single player is forced to carry a too heavy load. But guess what: that is not the player's fault! And the solution is sure as hell not to sell the player. You add more good players. And probably a better manager (if he for whatever reason insists that only one player is allowed to create).
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,201
Location
...
Moving Bruno on has to coincide with a change in approach towards a more proactive possession based style of play. Simply moving him on but playing the same style won't make us any better.
x1000000.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,868

It'll be interesting to see what happens to our chance creation if Bruno does leave near term. Will we find a new way of playing that compensates? Or will we just go back to what we were when Ole took over and people figured out that we just weren't all that, especially without Pogba.
Be much more useful to get the % of chances created to surrendering possession.
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,347
Moving Bruno on has to coincide with a change in approach towards a more proactive possession based style of play. Simply moving him on but playing the same style won't make us any better.
Just sign better players and that change will naturally happen with or without Bruno.

It's that simple to me.
 

Licha-Vidic

Last Man Standing 2 finalist 2023/24
Joined
Jan 9, 2023
Messages
1,373
The Maguire of our midfield. I said this in 2022 October. People will try to make stories around him, go round in circles but the facts remains we will end up with the same same storyline.

With Bruno we can not win anything big. Without match control you can not auto-pilot in over 50+ matches in a season. It's impossible. It can't happen. It's not rocket science.

Sustainable success means sustainable control in matches. You need to win over 40+ matches in a season to have a successful campaign..

The question is How do you win 40+ games in a season? What's the strategy? The plan? How do you plan to win 30 games in a PL season + around 8 games in UCL and another 5 on cups competitions?

How do you go about that? With Bruno playing football like ping pong? :D you will wait for a very long time.

Let's keep waiting and see how a Bruno Captained team will be successful
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,146
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
I don't like the way Bruno is playing, but we shouldn't be selling him, because he is vaulable asset. We should try changing the way he is playing, but I don't think that comes with Ten Hag, we will first need a new sane manager who can see that this style of football isn't correct way.

What a thoroughly underwhelming list of players. Strange that no successful sides have players on there.
Good point.

Also checking that list, except the last two most of teams are struggling to score lot of goals(funnily enough), and also conceede more goals than their rivals around. It's like there is correlation with having midfielder who tries so many killer passes and being the team prone to conceeding lot of goals, hmm...

You’re the expert. Enlighten me. You seem to have a much better grasp of how these stats are collated. Tell me more about all these corners landing on the head of Manchester United players.
Lots of these created chances are Bruno's corners and set pieces. Stop embarassing yourself by undermining others.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,276
Bruno needs to be managed and not worshipped by the next manager (if EtH loses his job)....
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,347
Lots of these created chances are Bruno's corners and set pieces. Stop embarassing yourself by undermining others.
how many of the chances created figure are from corners then? Sounds like you know.
 

#07

makes new threads with tweets in the OP
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
23,333
Bruno needs to be managed and not worshipped by the next manager (if EtH loses his job)....
I'd rather the next coach prioritise playing Bruno off the striker than Scott McTominay...
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,146
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
how many of the chances created figure are from corners then? Sounds like you know.
I don't know, but I have checked chalkboards from few games(you can find my post from last week somewhere), and they are counting lot of corners that end up as any kind of shot as chance created.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,061
We should try changing the way he is playing, but I don't think that comes with Ten Hag, we will first need a new sane manager who can see that this style of football isn't correct way.
Not only do I think he’s mostly incapable of changing the way he plays (he’s a 30 year old seasoned player who has been playing this way forever) — changing how he plays would make him massively redundant.

He’s not particularly quick, he’s a poor dribbler and at shielding the ball when pressured (which is normally why he passes very early), and his short passing game is so inconsistent. I don’t really know what he offers if you don’t just leave him to his own devices as a no.10.

He’s got a freakish engine and he sees the pass early — if you leave him as a free roaming player to run around and punt the ball he’ll tally up these Statman David and OPTA stats that get eaten up.
 

Marwood

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
4,347
I don't know, but I have checked chalkboards from few games(you can find my post from last week somewhere), and they are counting lot of corners that end up as any kind of shot as chance created.
Well if you don't know its a bit much to suggest another poster is embarrassing himself by saying we rarely create from corners.

Every United fan on the planet knows we're terrible at it.
 

Amar__

Geriatric lover and empath
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
24,146
Location
Sarajevo
Supports
MK Dons
Not only do I think he’s mostly incapable of changing the way he plays (he’s a 30 year old seasoned player who has been playing this way forever) — changing how he plays would make him massively redundant.

He’s not particularly quick, he’s a poor dribbler and at shielding the ball when pressured (which is normally why he passes very early), and his short passing game is so inconsistent. I don’t really know what he offers if you don’t just leave him to his own devices as a no.10.

He’s got a freakish engine and he sees the pass early — if you leave him as a free roaming player to run around and punt the ball he’ll tally up these Statman David and OPTA stats that get eaten up.
For me, anything is better than this style of football he is playing at the moment. He doesn't have to play every game, he can rotate long term with Mount if he doesn't listen, but I am sure he is capable of playing box to box midfielder who is playing it more safer and passing it wide and playing more back passes rather than gung ho everytime he receives the ball. I remember him being much calmer and safer with the ball when he arrived here, or am I imagining things?

I agree about his negatives like being shite under pressure and being slow, but I believe we can use his endless running in far more prolific way.
 

DevTheRed

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
1,079
Bruno is definitely capable of changing the way he plays.. I think the comments Ten Hag has made about the tactical set up indicates that he’s given Bruno a free role to almost do whatever he wants to make us a transition (vibes) team.

He’s a very good player who 2-3 seasons ago was a top 10 player in the world. Simple tactical changes could instantly help the way we play.. getting rid of him for me isn’t the answer.