Rezyuz
New Member
I said the same but a draw against chelseaHere's someone who's been right so far. Not sure about his next 2 though. I hope he's wrong.
I said the same but a draw against chelseaHere's someone who's been right so far. Not sure about his next 2 though. I hope he's wrong.
I actually had typed out that I would like Southampton 4th but removed it. Agreed but having Liverpool and City play more games is just as good.Fair enough, still not enough for me to hope that they finish in the top 4, the dream is for Southampton
I think we'd have to lose 4 games in order to not get top 4. We'd need to drop at least 9 points, and that's assuming Liverpool win all of their remaining games, which they won't. We can afford to drop 11 out of 18 points and still finish fourth. Top four is done and dusted, because we won't lose that many points, and Liverpool/Southampton are both going to drop points as well.Funny thing is, United's last 6 games still aren't easy by any means. Still have Chelsea, Everton and Palace (yes Palace) away. Then there's Arsenal at home too. They could still make a mess of this and blow top 4, but with the way they're playing now it would take some imposing to do that.
This still makes me laugh every time I open this thread.Okay then. Pack it up lads, lets prepare for next season.
Only if Liverpool and City finish outside the top 4. Ideal scenario.Southampton beat City on last day to finish 4th is dream scenario , total bluemoon meltdown
Yeah it would need a complete collapse for us to throw top 4 away now. It can happen you only have to look at City but it is not expected.I think we'd have to lose 4 games in order to not get top 4. We'd need to drop at least 9 points, and that's assuming Liverpool win all of their remaining games, which they won't. We can afford to drop 11 out of 18 points and still finish fourth. Top four is done and dusted, because we won't lose that many points, and Liverpool/Southampton are both going to drop points as well.
Of course, Chelsea United Arsenal in that orderOnly if Liverpool and City finish outside the top 4. Ideal scenario.
Points progression was similar for most of the season but Van Gaal killed it from March onwards.Don't know if anyone has already stated it but we've already got more points than the whole of last season, what a difference
Whilst we're winning just leave everything as it is thank you.Please lock this thread and start 'Bye bye title'. Thank you.
Not really - it started after 10 games in - 52 points from last 22 gamesPoints progression was similar for most of the season but Van Gaal killed it from March onwards.
I think we were worse than last season after first 10 games this season, and then started to even out until March where we really started to come into form.Not really - it started after 10 games in - 52 points from last 22 games
Not really - it started after 10 games in - 52 points from last 22 games
I think we were worse than last season after first 10 games this season, and then started to even out until March where we really started to come into form.
Exactly- 52 points from 22 games is title winning form
Well the constant team changes were necessary due to both injuries and also players not quite doing as the manager asked. He did say though the performances will come with automaticity and to get that we need consistency in selection, he also said numerous times he didn't want to rotate. I said fair enough, why not let him wait until he can choose a consistent selection and then give them a few games to gel? At that point people were calling for the sack!I'd have had faith if we were delivering good performances, but we weren't. There seemed to be no structure, no plan, no consistency, constant team changes. It was too much like last year, although I never had the sheer despondency of last year. This year I just had extreme frustration.
Now though, we seem to finally have a team, and decent players are not being relegated to the bench for no good reason.
Yeah over the last 22 games we have a better points/game average than Chelsea over the entire season @ 2.36 points a game compared to Chelsea's 2.35 over the season.Not really - it started after 10 games in - 52 points from last 22 games
We need to be fair to Van Gaal that the player's confidence at the start off the season was very low after last year and the injuries we had up until Christmas were ridiculous. I don't think Van Gaal had a full squad of players to even find out his best XI for over half of the season, then it takes time to get that side to gel.but we've missed out on really challenging thanks to some odd decision making earlier in the season. Credit to Van Gaal for the recent results, but we shouldn't airbrush history - we were absolutely dire for a large chunk of the season.
I'm trying to be as objective as possible. I think Van Gaal made some poor decisions in the early-mid part of the season, allied to injuries and low confidence amongst the players, while he's made some very creditable choices since then, for which he deserves credit.We need to be fair to Van Gaal that the player's confidence at the start off the season was very low after last year and the injuries we had up until Christmas were ridiculous. I don't think Van Gaal had a full squad of players to even find out his best XI for over half of the season, then it takes time to get that side to gel.
Exactly, agree totally, no magic wand that was going to erase last season in a momentWe need to be fair to Van Gaal that the player's confidence at the start off the season was very low after last year and the injuries we had up until Christmas were ridiculous. I don't think Van Gaal had a full squad of players to even find out his best XI for over half of the season, then it takes time to get that side to gel.
I will say in retrospect he stuck with the Rooney in midfield experiment for too long and I said repeatedly since Christmas I didn't know why Mata was out of the side. So yeah I would question him on those decisions, overall a very good season though.I'm trying to be as objective as possible. I think Van Gaal made some poor decisions in the early-mid part of the season, allied to injuries and low confidence amongst the players, while he's made some very creditable choices since then, for which he deserves credit.
Yeah, no one can dispute that it's turned into a good season: top four and a real pattern of play has emerged.I will say in retrospect he stuck with the Rooney in midfield experiment for too long and I said repeatedly since Christmas I didn't know why Mata was out of the side. So yeah I would question him on those decisions, overall a very good season though.
I know we had injury problems but there was a lot of strange choices - you only had to listen to phone-ins and read press reports. Plus watch the games. There was hell of a lot of dissatisfaction with the way the team were playing.Well the constant team changes were necessary due to both injuries and also players not quite doing as the manager asked. He did say though the performances will come with automaticity and to get that we need consistency in selection, he also said numerous times he didn't want to rotate. I said fair enough, why not let him wait until he can choose a consistent selection and then give them a few games to gel? At that point people were calling for the sack!
Also evidently there was a structure and plan, Louis van Gaal said it will be a process, the problems were there to see but so were the problems disappearing.
I'm not sure what is wrong with giving the manager time (the season for as long as he is challenging for top four) and also accepting his reasons in the press conference. You say 'for no good reason' but then you are in disagreement with Louis van Gaal's reasons, surely his wins against Spurs, City and Liverpool should be enough to convince you he knew what he was doing all along and he probably had his reasons, let's face it he is the expert on his system and not us, unless you are of the opinion the manager has got lucky?
Ander Herrera recently said in an interview Louis van Gaal didn't like that he would always move to the ball, he thinks if you wait where you are the team have the quality to find you and spaces will open, he said he trained to be more patient and wait for the ball.
Strange is a matter of opinion though, Louis van Gaal has a way of doing things and they made sense to that. He also claimed the press or even fans didn't understand this and so would criticised and he is right in that sense.I know we had injury problems but there was a lot of strange choices - you only had to listen to phone-ins and read press reports. Plus watch the games. There was hell of a lot of dissatisfaction with the way the team were playing.
There's nothing wrong with giving the manager time - I never at any point suggested otherwise. The game against Spurs saw a United we'd barely seen all season and it's continued from there. Before that, there were many games when we just looked like a disjointed mess with no cohesion whatsoever. Constant team changes - aside from injuries - meant no continuity and it showed.
Losing has never bothered me, but playing like clueless amateurs did. I've always been a great advocate of a good performance being more important than points. United put in quite a few embarrassing performances this season, with players who might not have been first on the team sheet, but who should have been good enough to beat teams like Milton Keynes, Preston etc.
Page 5, my only post this thread... .Yeah, honestly we are not playing well right now. I think simply playing players in more natural positions would help greatly. i would alos like to see way more of Mata as breaking down compact teams is right up his alley.
This all said I think it will be competitive. by no means is it over and conversely by no means is it a sure thing. But we need to play better if we want to try and ensure this happens and frankly i think most of our ills are odd tactics and players out of position.