Synco
Lucio's #1 Fan
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2014
- Messages
- 6,450
Yes, the collective effort was certainly there - generally that was good, but I still felt there were some individual limitations spoiling too many promising situations. (I'm thinking about CL top level here.) I thought the only times when there was no overreliance on Hazard was when Fabregas played as an additional playmaker behind the Belgian, especially in the second half of the season. That's what I thought Chelsea's attacking game should look like, but Conte seems to prefer the defensive stability a second DM provides.I actually don't feel like we were that over-reliant on Hazard last year. We have been the years before, but last year saw a much stronger Pedro, Moses creating a lot of openings with his blistering pace and direct play, and Fab when he was on creating a lot and posing a decent goal threat. Obviously having a Hazard in the team is going to mean he's hugely important and noticable, but unlike in previous years where if he was out it felt like we were fecked, last year felt much more of a team effort.
Agree about Pedro, the understanding between him, Fabregas and Hazard was great at times (the interplay for Pedro's goal against Bournemouth ).
Last edited: