Your last paragraph says “the people at the club who earn £25k working in the catering/ticketing/stadium tour departments, and they shall be punished for it”.
What Ineos are doing isn’t targeted at those people at all. It’s targeted at the needless bloat that crept in under the watch of Woodward and his banker mates. The offices in London as well as Manchester and the inefficiencies in non-football crucial areas of the club.
It’s easy to say they should just sack all the managers (they have sacked a lot of them) and leave all the workers alone, but that’s too simple and infantile an argument. Changing a broken culture in real life isn’t that simple.
Why not give them the benefit of the doubt, and see what the place is like to work at in 3 years time. Throwing the toys out of the pram now, when they’ve only been in a wet week and have inherited a shitshow doesn’t make any sense at all
And it was a generalisation about departments who earn the lowest having their bonuses and canteen removed/slashed. That's why it was in that part of my post and not in the bit about WFH.
Comprehension skills lacking?
And you are very much generalising from a position of ignorance about the organisation at OT, and essentially labelling unknown numbers of staff members - working
people - as 'bloat', whereas I'm someone with personal experience of working in that environment.
I find it ironic that you use the phrase 'throwing your toys out of the pram' for criticising Radcliffe's methods, when that appears to be his actual business plan, after just - as you put it yourself - a wet week.