Agree, we need another striker. You said Toney and Osimhen. That is a stretch in January.
Maybe to get you on side, who has been anti Ratcliffe from the start.
A competent board would not have approved those kind of wages.
No he hasn't. He's rehashed publically available information and gullable viewers fell for it
If what you say is true and SJR just buys Glazer shares, then that should lead to shares dropping.
Nope, you're wrong. It's amusing how often he is dismissed on here.
They’ve had access to the clubs data for months though, who’s to say they haven’t been carrying out assessments throughout that period.
Agree.
It someone keeps guessing, they eventually they will get it right.
How can you be certain that he is ?
He isn't guessing. Some just can't handle the fact that an American actually has a decent source where Manchester United are concerned. In this case, on the INEOS side specifically. However, anyone with any inside information is immediately shut down on here. Even Fabrizio Romano.
I have asked before for anyone to give an example of news that was broken by him, no one came up with anything that wasn't already publicly available
What news has he broken before anyone else? Genuine question.
It's just my expectation, I could be wrong of course but either way there is still some value to the A shares. They did pay dividends in the past (not at the moment and a possible reason by Ariel sold) and anyone who wants full control (like Sheikh Jassim) has to buy them.
I feel you are being disingenuous. The guy has sources undoubtedly.
It's pretty obvious they are going into January with a clear plan. It's not like they started to think about this last week. The first indication that Mitchell was earmarked by Ratcliffe as a DOF came in early May (Ben Jacobs). We've known that Ratcliffe wants to take away recruitment authority from the manager and leave it in the hands of "experts", which more or less means data-driven recruitment, for longer than that. It was reported in the Telegraph that he specifically asked the Glazers for control of transfers for the summer-window in May, while the finer points of the deal was being negotiated. That was regarding the 69% deal, where Ratcliffe would have essentially bought out the Glazers' shares only, but that ended up canceled as it would have led to lawsuits from Class-A share-holders.
Some people don’t see it as obvious unfortunately.
It's actually amazing how gullable people are. There's not one piece of actual news he has broken.
How often do you watch his videos or look at his posts in the discord though?
Ive seen a lot of the vids you posted. One of which you and another poster were sure was new info, before I posted Ben Jacob's saying the same thing 24 hours earlier.
The discord is free. I look in there now and then. He posts stuff in there before it becomes mainstream.Ive seen a lot of the vids you posted. One of which you and another poster were sure was new info, before I posted Ben Jacob's saying the same thing 24 hours earlier.
And if discord is for money, then it's sad that people are actually paying to be fooled
Name one thing he's put in discourse with the source and show what he's broken.
Mate I’m not here to convince you. If you don’t think so then whatever it’s really not that deep.
"rotting core" is bollocks. £250m on the existing structure would be ample. Inside the ground it is still one of the best stadiums in the world. Sure the concourses need work, and the roof and needs bringing into the 21st century, but otherwise I'd not chuck away 100 years of history for a soulless new bowl, miles away from where it is now, just because it has a jumbotron and a cheese room.
Yes, I do watch them and that's how I know he's a BS merchant. And you still haven't provided any of us with any videos or podcasts where he breaks news before other sources.
Trust me I am not him.
Amen. I was a Denver Broncos season ticket holder in their old Mile High Stadium which really was crumbling apart. The new stadium, right next door was nice and shiny, but you can never ever get back what was lost with the old stadium. The new stadium is great for making money, but it's lost the magic the old stadium had and you can't replicate it. Also, our ticket prices doubled with the new stadium.
James has been consistent with INEOS being the preferred bid of the Glazers throughout the process even when everyone else was saying Qatar had won/were winning.
Yes he was always very relaxed about INEOS amongst all the Qatar hype. Making him look biased at times but he just simply had better information.
Probably to Radcliffe's benefit that he has people thinking he's only buying 25% of the club.
Like which story?
Agree totally with what you say.
I don’t have specifics because I’m not actively keeping records mate. He posted stuff and said stuff about Varane recently though before anyone else.
From being the biggest pro-Qatar poster in this thread to being accused of being the Muppetiers guy
Unless the targets in January were long-standing and previously unobtainable because of the budget constraints.
I got banned from the discordFrom being the biggest pro-Qatar poster in this thread to being accused of being the Muppetiers guy
What a journey for @Berbaclass
What about if the people coming in have a list of quality players, a la Peter Kenyon?
You're saying that just because you've been exposed...I got banned from the discord
