g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,554
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
I reckon every team in the league is better run than United, but I still think we should have loftier ambitions than “like Brighton”
It’s not about ambition, it’s about having the competency and vision to realise those ambitions.

Brighton is a very well run club and I’m sure we could learn from them. It’s not about carbon copying them.
 

Pes6Monster

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 11, 2023
Messages
499
Surely one more protest will let Jassim know he's in all our hearts.

Big tomorrow day next week
 

Yorke to Cole

Full Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
924
Surely one more protest will let Jassim know he's in all our hearts.

Big tomorrow day next week
If my memory serves me correctly, you were predicting week after week that Jassim and Qatar were going to pony up the extra billion needed to get it over the line.

What happened?
 

AFC NimbleThumb

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
8,363
Pretty sure if that was the case mate they’d be announcing those plans to show intent to the fans regarding the stadium. Let’s see but I wouldn’t hold my breath
Exactly. If yesterday were the trigger for more it would have been in the press release.

There’s always a possibility of more but what we got yesterday were the legal parameters, anything above & beyond is fantasy.
Equally no signs they aren't willing to sell either.

Basically both sides of this argument are talking shite because simply put, nobody knows.
We live in a world where most press releases will tell you what a person/thing is going to do, not what it is not.

Where were you when countless posters were speaking out of their arses about how there would be a ‘clear path to full ownership’ or saying ‘Sir Jim isn’t stupid of course he’ll be buying the club entirely eventually’?

The press release told us exactly what will be invested [for now], so based on that people are asking questions. To base a counter on an assumption of investment above & beyond what we were told in a press release given only yesterday is fanciful at best.
 

AneRu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
3,200
There’s no signs that they’ll sell anymore shares they’ve got a billion to shut the siblings up and there’s no option of future shares being available as it stands that’s the facts. Not sure what you’re writing honestly
I think, funds permitting on Sir Jim's part, it will end up with him as the majority owner and the two holdouts in Joel and Avram being minority owners. Over the years we are going to see the other siblings stepping out and Sir Jim being on hand to buy them out and this deal will form the basis of future transactions that will have Ratcliffe getting an agreed portion in class B and the rest in class A.

The Glazers were approving 200m transfer budgets for ETH, Arnold and Murtough. I don't think they will stand in the way of genuine transformation which if successful will see a growth of their asset and their club back to more assured income from qualification to the CL which is a given if we become successful again. Arsenal were a joke just two seasons ago but look at them now, the same can happen here and they will be the biggest beneficiaries.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,554
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
Pretty sure if that was the case mate they’d be announcing those plans to show intent to the fans regarding the stadium. Let’s see but I wouldn’t hold my breath
Could be holding that back until it’s ratified by the FA and PL and all official in case they run in to issues (as unlikely as that is)
 

AneRu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
3,200
Pretty sure if that was the case mate they’d be announcing those plans to show intent to the fans regarding the stadium. Let’s see but I wouldn’t hold my breath
The stadium and how it will be funded are strategic and operational issues to be decided by the parties internally so there is no need to announce them with the deal that just outlined the new ownership structure. For all intents and purposes the new co-owners seem to he more preoccupied with sorting the first team.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,483
Exactly! @Castia keeps on reaching though for as much negative spin they can muster!

They never wanted to sell you must see that. I also don’t think Jim wanted a full buyout. Both parties are absolutely buzzing with this deal.

I’ll take your point on ultimately nobody knows what will happen with the shares but if they were in a rush to go you’d think that a buyout option would have been negotiated and it hasn’t. There was talk of them having a staged exit over the coming years but there’s absolutely nothing indicating that at this moment
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,549
Maybe he’ll finally be able to push through the Ron Vlaar deal.
 

OrcaFat

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
5,672
I'm glad to see someone else have control of the Football side of things. And even though Brailsford is a cheat, he is a sport specialist which I believe matter and Blanc is a sport executive that knows what he is doing both financially but also in terms of the organizational side of things.

And Football is I believe easier than the other sports they invested in, especially when you are involved with a massive Football club that generates enough for his own investments and has enough pull to attract most top level personnel. Things can turn around very quickly in Football if you take a handful of good decisions, one of the big issue with the Glazers and Woodward has been the indecisiveness which is likely the fruit of working with SAF, I mean we have fans who somehow believe that 6 managers in 10 years is a lot or too much.

People should remember that during the same period of time Bayern had 8 different managers(including interims), Real Madrid had 6 different and 7 in total, Juventus had 4 different and 5 in total. Both Milan team have had 10 different managers. Napoli have had 7 different managers. The point being that United are arguably the club that underachieved the most and one of the key issue is the club reluctance to change things quickly which as far as I know is not an issue for Ineos Sport.
There is one thing that I am reading about Ineos - they (supposedly) understand sport. They will look at the club and see plenty that we can’t see. If they really understand football clubs they will have a better idea than us what the problem is. Sacking the manager only helps if the manager is actually the problem.
 

Pes6Monster

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 11, 2023
Messages
499
The stadium and how it will be funded are strategic and operational issues to be decided by the parties internally so there is no need to announce them with the deal that just outlined the new ownership structure. For all intents and purposes the new co-owners seem to he more preoccupied with sorting the first team.
Not too arsed about the stadium. Can do without cheeserooms and jumbotrons. If UEFA prefer the Emptyhad, meh.


If my memory serves me correctly, you were predicting week after week that Jassim and Qatar were going to pony up the extra billion needed to get it over the line.

What happened?
I was wrong. Thank Christ.

Mind you, have never been enthused by Ratcliffe.

Hope I'm wrong again, I usually am, but can see it all going wrong and fast.

Maybe he’ll finally be able to push through the Ron Vlaar deal.
Nicolas Gaitan Wesley Sneijder Celio Silva Here We Go!
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,507
Location
Manchester
Let’s just say there’s a few glass half empty posters v the glass half full.

That’s the two camps now and I’d rather be in the latter personally. Ho ho ho!
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,483
Let’s just say there’s a few glass half empty posters v the glass half full.

That’s the two camps now and I’d rather be in the latter personally. Ho ho ho!
I’ve wanted these clowns gone for 15 years mate and the chance seemed to be finally here. But this deal feels like a complete sham for us fans of the club.

Look I hope to be proven wrong. In the next 12 months Jim might have revealed plans for a OT redevelopment and could have furthered his stake in the club but I’m sceptical to say the least. This deal just suits all parties. Glazers stay, Jim gets a stake with sporting control. Best we’ll get is a new footballing setup but they’ve not even impressed in that regard elsewhere

Im here to be proven wrong I’d fecking love it if I have to apologise down the line
 

George The Best

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
2,114
Location
Nut Megging
Capital injections are usually handled by the issuance of new shares. Since the money is used by the club, no individual sells their shares. It means everyone will be diluted equally.

He is obligated to inject 300m. The board may approve additional capital injections. He isn’t obligated, but he could inject more if he wanted to and the board agrees.

Also, people are looking at the 300m and laughing, but it’s possible that the 300m will be used as equity for OT renovation and the rest will be financed with loans. Typically, in commercial real estate, 30/70 is common split, they might spend up to 1b on OT.
So who is financing any possible loans. Utd can’t and neither are INEOS, as Sir Jim has made clear. So only possible loans would be on Sir Jim personally - but why would he take that on given his wealth?
 

NWRed

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
1,180
There is nothing special about 24 months with either of those issues. The debt has been astronomical and rising for 15 years and there was nothing stopping Glazers from keeping it that way for another decade. Same with team and infrastucture. They have been rotting for a long time and as unhealthy as it is, Glazers had the means to continue with it for as long as they believe that it might be worth it for them in the long run.
As far as I know the current debt situation is $425m at a fixed 3.79% due in 2027 and a further $225m at a low variable interest rate due in 2025, the revolving credit facility is on similar rates. Given the current levels of inflation and interest rates they're likely to have to pay much higher rates of interest to be able to refinance it. I don't think the $225m has been refinanced yet, but I may be wrong as I don't follow as closely as I used to, but the $425m at 3.79% that needs refinancing before 2027 is going to be at much higher rate next time, edging towards the PIK loan levels of the early years, and they simply couldn't afford to deal with that, the stadium, the training ground and continuing to invest in the team. It would have forced them to sell. The 18-24 month timeline is because they would have to sort out refinancing before 2027. The Ratcliffe deal gives them a lifeline of patching up the stadium so they can deal with refinancing the debt. Interest payments will increase dramatically in the next couple of years though and impact the clubs ability to invest in the team.
 

AneRu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
3,200
I’ve wanted these clowns gone for 15 years mate and the chance seemed to be finally here. But this deal feels like a complete sham for us fans of the club.

Look I hope to be proven wrong. In the next 12 months Jim might have revealed plans for a OT redevelopment and could have furthered his stake in the club but I’m sceptical to say the least. This deal just suits all parties. Glazers stay, Jim gets a stake with sporting control. Best we’ll get is a new footballing setup but they’ve not even impressed in that regard elsewhere

Im here to be proven wrong I’d fecking love it if I have to apologise down the line
Currently he is a minority shareholder with a specific mandate on the football side. Let's see the calibre of Sporting Director he will choose and attract, the coach his team will appoint cause Ten Hag is on the ropes and how things pan out thereafter. That's his stated immediate concern - no point in having a fantastic stadium like Tottenham without the team to play in it.

He has already obligated himself to injecting £300m which should be enough for an additional stand and sprucing up Carrington. Liverpool, City et al build modern training grounds for circa 50m so getting Carrington up to standard shouldn't cost that much as it will be a renovation. So from the 300m to be injected we will have some significant infrastructural upgrades.

The mess at first team level is the clear and present danger to the club. This is where we need our focus on right now.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,483
They never said they would either. It was always a ‘strategic review’ not a straight outright sale. It was the fans and media that got carried away with the notion of a sale.
The Glazers have probably been laughing their asses off since last November.
Well that is probably the case. I never thought it would be 25% though with no road to leave in the coming years. I mean I’ve been against Jim all the way through but even he had much better offers early on.

We’ll get a DoF. Big deal most clubs in the championship have a DoF were that fecking crap that we’re being blinded by this amateur hour deal that has absolutely no long term plan.
 

Yorke to Cole

Full Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
924
They never said they would either. It was always a ‘strategic review’ not a straight outright sale. It was the fans and media that got carried away with the notion of a sale.
The Glazers have probably been laughing their asses off since last November.
Even David Ornstein said at the beginning that this could "seismic for Manchester United supporters."
 

Red in STL

Turnover not takeover
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
10,162
Location
In Bed
Supports
The only team that matters
Over one billion in dividends have been took out mate. One billion
According to The Athletic it's 166 million in dividends, I think you are confusing debt (loans/credit lines) with dividends when they are actually completely different things of which only one puts money in their pockets
 

redshaw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
9,764
How does he get the name wrong even when he's f*cking quoting the correct spelling?
There is an area in Greater Manchester called Radcliffe and it's a common surname with famous people like Daniel Radcliffe and BBC radio presenter Mark Radcliffe from Bolton.

A while back I used to think Sir Jim's surname name was Radcliffe when not really paying attention and him being local.
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,408
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
Some of the lads have been on here complaining all Christmas Day based on hypotheticals. At least wait till the end of the summer window to start complaining no? This is probably going to take years to fix either way. We will hear from the horses mouth soon enough what the plan is
 

Red in STL

Turnover not takeover
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
10,162
Location
In Bed
Supports
The only team that matters
There is an area in Greater Manchester called Radcliffe and it's a common surname with famous people like Daniel Radcliffe and BBC radio presenter Mark Radcliffe from Bolton.

A while back I used to think Sir Jim's surname name was Radcliffe when not really paying attention and him being local.
Even Gary Neville called him Radcliffe in a tweet yesterday, once upon a time I actually lived in Radcliffe!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.