Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,099
I hope not either, it’d be a sign that we’re not planning signings with the manager anymore
Imagine it's just a sop to the fans. None of the suggestions will be considered seriously unless they already square with the scouts' targets, or they're available on a free like Ibrahimovic.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
He will not borrow with interest, he is a QIB board member and works through Islamic banking. That means if he is to borrow the money from the bank it will be with 0% interest, but instead the bank will own a share in the club. QIB owns assets of about 47B, they will be selling some assets or they already did to make money available for their purchase of united.
The point is borrowing will occur (the poster I responded to claimed there will be none).

Also if INEOS said they won't put debt on the club so I'm not sure why the cost to service their debt matters so much.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,702
People wouldn’t do that man, be nice.
One of the independent.co.uk owners is a Saudi. His country has border issues with qatar. The other is a Russian oligarch. Qatar has been quite vocal regarding Russia's invasion of ukraine. Which makes you wonder why a journalist who doesn't mind working for such 'independent ' media is being so vocal about Jassim buying united
 

7even

Resident moaner, hypocrite and moron
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
4,218
Location
Lifetime vacation
There is no way he has £6bn lying around to spunk on purchasing United. Not in a month of Sundays.
Sir Jim is personally worth £16b - £18b and he has chosen to debt finance parts of his bid. I cannot see past this being a state bid.
Nobody outside those involved knows who’s behind the bid but what we can do is a qualified guess based on the information that’s available.

You and many other are totally convinced that the Qatar state (royal family) is behind the bid. Nothing wrong with that and you can be right but there’re also other owning constellations that can be possible without being directly legally or financially connected to the inner circle of the royal family. It’s actually when you look at it from a neutral standpoint more likely that the Nine Two Foundation (NTF) could be a private consortium who’s cooperating with the Qatar Islamic Bank. (QIB)

They probably have to seek some kind of blessing from the ruling family but that itself doesn’t mean legally it’s a state bid. Qatar is a very small country with an original population less than 400 000 people so it’s totally understandable if there’re national regulations to protect the state of Qatar how national banks and investors can do business and invest money outside there own country. It’s ignorant and actually a little bit xenophobic to assume that everything from that region is done with bad intentions.

As mention earlier today in this thread there’re a lots of synergy effects of owning a world wide know football club like MU if they build a eco system around this purchase the right way. Without going into to details it’s more than likely that the NTF has a financial business plan that generate value to QIB and involved investors that is seen as a financial risk worth taking. Not to mention goodwill and other intangible values.

Finally we have so far no clue whatsoever about Sheik Jassim political and religious view about human rights. He had his education in a western university and has been working in European countries for a large part of his life, off course it will influence how he look at these issues. Instead of assume the worst maybe a ownership of a world wide known sport club can contribute to some sort of positive evolution in his home country.

Isn’t that we all want if we truly care about human rights?
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
The PL should have never allowed these types of owners from the off. That's where the real issue lies. City deal should never have been allowed or the Newcastle one. It's one thing allowing rich business men in but it's another to let a effectively a state have control over one of our clubs for political purposes.

Not sure the PL can do anything now. It's too late. Pandora's box was opened.
 

MTF

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
5,243
Location
New York City
One of the independent.co.uk owners is a Saudi. His country has border issues with qatar. The other is a Russian oligarch. Qatar has been quite vocal regarding Russia's invasion of ukraine. Which makes you wonder why a journalist who doesn't mind working for such 'independent ' media is being so vocal about Jassim buying united
I thought they had hugged it out:

 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,414
There is no way he has £6bn lying around to spunk on purchasing United. Not in a month of Sundays.
Sir Jim is personally worth £16b - £18b and he has chosen to debt finance parts of his bid. I cannot see past this being a state bid.
Of course, at some level the Qatari state are backing this takeover.

I don't want United to be state owned but if this truly isn't state backed bid, then we as United fans should be worried. As we haven't a clue where all these billions for purchase and promised infrastructure upgrades would be coming from.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
Jim has more provable wealth? Yeah, of course. He owns Nice and the Qatari's own PSG with Messi, Neymar, and Mbappe. That's provable wealth for you. Jim on the other hand isn't even worth what the Glazers are asking for their majority stake in the club, let alone the full thing.
He's worth over £20b.
 

redshaw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
9,701
I'd say we've already sleepwalked into it with Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi and Russia. Now it's just a case of do you let yourself get bought or watch on while other clubs get bought in a oil club lockout at the top of the league most seasons. United can't take on 4-5 oil clubs.

I'd rather have no state clubs and actual swift and harsh punishment for dodgy sponsorships and flouting ffp but we're 20 years too late.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,913
Location
Somewhere out there
One of the independent.co.uk owners is a Saudi. His country has border issues with qatar. The other is a Russian oligarch. Qatar has been quite vocal regarding Russia's invasion of ukraine. Which makes you wonder why a journalist who doesn't mind working for such 'independent ' media is being so vocal about Jassim buying united
Oh there you really showed me how ad hominem arguments wouldn’t be used.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
The point is borrowing will occur (the poster I responded to claimed there will be none).

Also if INEOS said they won't put debt on the club so I'm not sure why the cost to service their debt matters so much.
Because depending on the corporate structure INEOS might still be the parent company. There's a million ways that could play out to be the club's problem. If INEOS has plans to touch club money the debt being on their books is as good as a paper mache bulletproof. Then depending on the loan structure the lenders can attach conditions allowing them to go after assets of parent or subsidiary, the bank will use all the protections they can before fronting a billion dollar loan.
 
Last edited:

Rood

nostradamus like gloater
Scout
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
21,335
Location
@United_Hour
Not sure the Edwards were the first to take profit, I think a lot of people have made profit from a lot of clubs over history. Could be wrong about us though. Now of course most of the prem are owned by people who want to make money out of them, mostly foreigners, although at least it amuses me that the likes of Liverpool fans don't even know it.

Couldn't agree more about the soul of the club though, we're all hoping.
Actually no one made any money from football clubs in England until the rules about such things were changed in 1980s - it was the Edwards family (and a few other owners, Spurs in particular) who pushed for that.


Because the club would carry a state owned stench if it succeeds.
I dont even know what that means but I refer you to this post: https://www.redcafe.net/threads/gla...ic-and-post-respectfully.474085/post-30306153
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,913
Location
Somewhere out there
I'd say we've already sleepwalked into it with Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi and Russia. Now it's just a case of do you let yourself get bought or watch on while other clubs get bought in a oil club lockout at the top of the league most seasons. United can't take on 4-5 oil clubs.
Well clearly they can, if they were run well by a rich company that didn’t need to leverage debt onto the club and invested in infrastructure.

United, Real, Barca, Bayern & to an extent Liverpool are clubs that with right investment can absolutely challenge them.
Now an oil owned United, that’d could be a game changer for Real, Barca, Bayern, Liverpool.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,414
One of the independent.co.uk owners is a Saudi. His country has border issues with qatar. The other is a Russian oligarch. Qatar has been quite vocal regarding Russia's invasion of ukraine. Which makes you wonder why a journalist who doesn't mind working for such 'independent ' media is being so vocal about Jassim buying united
A Saudi individual or the Saudi state?
 

Rood

nostradamus like gloater
Scout
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
21,335
Location
@United_Hour
Nobody outside those involved knows who’s behind the bid but what we can do is a qualified guess based on the information that’s available.

You and many other are totally convinced that the Qatar state (royal family) is behind the bid. Nothing wrong with that and you can be right but there’re also other owning constellations that can be possible without being directly legally or financially connected to the inner circle of the royal family. It’s actually when you look at it from a neutral standpoint more likely that the Nine Two Foundation (NTF) could be a private consortium who’s cooperating with the Qatar Islamic Bank. (QIB)

They probably have to seek some kind of blessing from the ruling family but that itself doesn’t mean legally it’s a state bid. Qatar is a very small country with an original population less than 400 000 people so it’s totally understandable if there’re national regulations to protect the state of Qatar how national banks and investors can do business and invest money outside there own country. It’s ignorant and actually a little bit xenophobic to assume that everything from that region is done with bad intentions.

As mention earlier today in this thread there’re a lots of synergy effects of owning a world wide know football club like MU if they build a eco system around this purchase the right way. Without going into to details it’s more than likely that the NTF has a financial business plan that generate value to QIB and involved investors that is seen as a financial risk worth taking. Not to mention goodwill and other intangible values.

Finally we have so far no clue whatsoever about Sheik Jassim political and religious view about human rights. He had his education in a western university and has been working in European countries for a large part of his life, off course it will influence how he look at these issues. Instead of assume the worst maybe a ownership of a world wide known sport club can contribute to some sort of positive evolution in his home country.

Isn’t that we all want if we truly care about human rights?
Agree with all this - a fair summary

Lots of people making assumptions based on very little
 

georgipep

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
2,474
Location
Not far enough
Actually no one made any money from football clubs in England until the rules about such things were changed in 1980s
Ridiculous statement :D

Every owner has extracted money from clubs and has made profits. There are more than one ways to make money from owning a football club too.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
Because INEOS would still be the parent company. There's a million ways that could play out to be the club's problem. If INEOS has plans to touch club money the debt being on their books is as good as a paper mache bulletproof.
This is a company with revenues of over £60b and an owner worth £20b. This isn't the Glazers we are talking about here. What doomsday scenario do you see happening? Again if he's promised not to saddle the club with debt what does it matter?
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,702
Clearly, and as you’re posting on a iphone I hope you never complained about the war in Iraq, or the disgusting withdrawal of US Troops from Afghanistan.
I own a Samsung. I am not the hypocrite who complain about Qatari bid for some football club while working for a so called independent media owned a Russian oligarch and a shady saudi investor
 

Woziak

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
3,631
The point is borrowing will occur (the poster I responded to claimed there will be none).

Also if INEOS said they won't put debt on the club so I'm not sure why the cost to service their debt matters so much.

This is spot on Funds will be made available with no interest, but they will own a stake in the club. The initial £5.5-5.7bn will be the first stage of potential
Investment up to £8-10bn over a 5 year period. The rest of the shares approx 700,000 at $20-21 will be then bought to take the club off the stock market and make it Privately owned. They may then settle the debt as they have bought controlling 69% voting shares and for a short period the club will trade as normal on NYSE. The only question is will the bid of £5.5-5.8m include the £620m debt or will this be paid off after the glaziers shares have been sold. Transfer activity will not need huge investment as the club will use its existing credit lines for this summer once the debt has been cleared.

The Qatari bid if successful will then have a 4/6 week as the preferred bidder which basically means the house is bought, exchanged but not completed so things can still go wrong however during this time, Qatari bankers will be working on the financials to buy the club and take the club off the stock market but at the same time closely working with Arnold, Murtourgh and new Exec Director Matt Hargreaves, which may be a Qatari appointment already as the ‘Director of Football Negotiations’ The fact this guy used to work for adidas and probably has a list of top players around Europe with details of club and sponsorship contracts means we might just become more efficient this summer.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
This is a company with revenues of over £60b and an owner worth £20b. This isn't the Glazers we are talking about here. What doomsday scenario do you see happening? Again if he's promised not to saddle the club with debt what does it matter?
60bn doesn't mean 60bn in cash or lliquidity. That's why this loan thing even exists in the first place. People need to stop shouting their net worth like we don't have google. We know their net worth and it doesn't necessarily mean jack shit. How do you suppose billion dollar companies go bankrupt? There's more to financial health than quoting net worth figures
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,702
An investor with close ties to the country's state owned bank?

Sounds familiar.
Hence the hypocrisy. The other investor seems to be Putin's less successful cousin. Their career path is very similar
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
No he’s not.

Bloomberg has him at £9.1b

Sunday Times has him at £6b

Forbes has him atr £18b

SJR’s net worth is not overr £20b.
I was looking at dollars, but the point still stands. He's worth more than what the asking price is.
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
60bn doesn't mean 60bn in cash or lliquidity. That's why this loan thing even exists in the first place. People need to stop shouting their net worth like we don't have google. We know their net worth and it doesn't necessarily mean jack shit. How do you suppose billion dollar companies go bankrupt? There's more to financial health than quoting net worth figures
60b does mean that they have the capital to service their debt. That's why it's important.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,423
Location
left wing
I find it odd that Jassim didn't show up, considering he's supposedly a massive United fan

you'd think he'd be excited to be involved and be there

and to all the business experts about to tell me this isn't how billionaire's do business, spare me
He's likely just the front man. The Qataris will be happy for him to be the face of the bid, but when it comes to due diligence and negotiating the asking price, it is time for the grown ups to take over - that's who we saw at OT this week.
 

711

Verified Bird Expert
Scout
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
24,261
Location
Don't sign old players and cast offs
feel free to show me any proof of this

Meanwhile you can educate yourself here: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmcumeds/792/79205.htm
Cracking report, thank you. So owners could only take 5% pa, contrary to my earlier thoughts.

Off-topic but the section on the Football League is interesting too. A lot of people seem completely unaware of how successful our 'second tier' is, the 4th or 5th best supported league in Europe, not the 4th or 5th of the second tiers, the 4th or 5th of them all.
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,957
Location
Editing my own posts.
Agree with all this - a fair summary

Lots of people making assumptions based on very little
bending over and making excuses already. All the shit City and Newcastle fans say, just getting right ahead of it.
 
Last edited:

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,201
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
Of course, at some level the Qatari state are backing this takeover.

I don't want United to be state owned but if this truly isn't state backed bid, then we as United fans should be worried. As we haven't a clue where all these billions for purchase and promised infrastructure upgrades would be coming from.
Yeah I’m not dead set against the Jassim bid, but there are so many questions unanswered that it makes me doubtful - and I’m shocked that so many just accept this bid at face value and question nothing.
 

Chief123

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
12,787
You would never guess we were approaching one of the best days in Utd’s modern history with the pending departure of Glazers. Exciting times ahead.

I don’t ever want to see those 2 penny pony tails ever again.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
You would never guess we were approaching one of the best days in Utd’s modern history with the pending departure of Glazers. Exciting times ahead.

I don't ever want to see those 2 penny pony tails ever again.
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.