Again, support who you want. However when you say that people leaving their lifelong club who they love because of morally reprehensible owners are “pissing away” their support - that’s why people find you antagonistic.Look, being a United fan has been a daily interest/passion for me for about 26 years. You are free to do what you want but I'm not going to piss away that just because the club may get owners that are morally problematic.
Well OK I guess I have, but these things don't impact which team I support. If I see another side doing great charity work, I'd think that's nice, but I wouldn't suddenly start supporting themYou’ve never thought about their position on Greenwood? Or thought poorly or Liverpool for how they handle the Suarez issue? Or disliked City for cheating in the league? Or been proud of the charity work the lads do?
If I've ever called city cheaters it's in relation to their breaking of ffp rules. I've never commented on their ownership. So wind your neck in a bit, eh? Before throwing accusations aroundAnd yet you call City cheaters. Different mindset for United I suppose ?
Is that genuinely all you took from my posts? From the thread I linked on the chairman of MUST saying the same things? Me “digging a hole”?So this evening’s proceeding’s was basically @Wumminator trying to be cute with a play on one of the definition’s of moral and then proceeded to dig a hole so deep he needs to be winched out. Nothing to see here.
If everyone gets a pass here I think it has to be conditional upon not openly looking down on those who chose to walk away.Life is hard enough as it is for the average man on the street to burdon themselves with the worries of billionaire owners buying millionaire players for entertainment purposes. I think regards of whether you support Qatar or Jim Ratcliffe or even the Glazers, at the end of the day you cant put the blame on people who want to continue to support the club. I have my own issues with the club if Qatar take over, but to judge the fans I feel is something you cant do. We're friends, fathers, sons, wifes, sisters, brothers, girlfriends, boyfriends, customers, workers first. If you want to continue to support Manchester United, you're not the ones at fault.
How foolish of you to expect anything useful in this thread. You’ll probably find more substantial information on the takeover by opening your kitchen bin.Saw all the new pages thinking there might be some news I missed but nope more of the same nonsense. It's very impressive.
I like him as a poster but I found out he financially benefitted from the City takeover through gentrification months ago so all this moral talk is laughable in my eyes.So this evening’s proceeding’s was basically @Wumminator trying to be cute with a play on one of the definition’s of moral and then proceeded to dig a hole so deep he needs to be winched out. Nothing to see here.
I regret clicking on "Show ignored content"So this evening’s proceeding’s was basically @Wumminator trying to be cute with a play on one of the definition’s of moral and then proceeded to dig a hole so deep he needs to be winched out. Nothing to see here.
Yeah my bad for accusing you of actually saying something negative about city. Getting you to post the c-word seemed difficult enough, but you were probably backed into a corner.If I've ever called city cheaters it's in relation to their breaking of ffp rules. I've never commented on their ownership. So wind your neck in a bit, eh? Before throwing accusations around
I don’t see how either of those two things would occur. We don’t need to cheat FFP. We just need to spend better and invest in our infrastructure. Our transfer spend has largely been sufficient under the Glazers even if spent poorly. If Sheikh Jassim came in we’d likely still be self sufficient on the Sporting side of things.If we’re not winning fairly, or United winning is through countless pain caused to others - I’d rather not win.
Morals aren’t relevant when you have a beneficial gain from it. It’s only important when you want to poke other peoples’ stance.I like him as a poster but I found out he financially benefitted from the City takeover through gentrification months ago so all this moral talk is laughable in my eyes.
All this talk and there’s only one poster who had money placed in his pocket through oil money and it’s not the posters replying to jabs about morals!
No, not a fully leveraged buyout
It's not particularly crazy. It's been the most likely timeframe for sport franchises over the past years.Crazy to think that this story broke in November and we are still waiting for firm news as to who our owners will even be, let alone for all the paperwork to be completed.
It doesn’t apply to the take over bids. In fact there’s even doubt whether it would have applied to the Glazers leveraged buyout. In summary, it’s looking pretty pointless.
When you support a club it’s normally as a child to begin withYou’ve never thought about their position on Greenwood? Or thought poorly or Liverpool for how they handle the Suarez issue? Or disliked City for cheating in the league? Or been proud of the charity work the lads do?
Yes, but you're confounding the thing you're actually talking about here (a tie to United that has nothing to do with success on the pitch) with something else (morals).That’s why so many of us are upset and baffled by the “I don’t care about morals” brigade.
Ah, didn't realise. I guess it just feels like it has dragged on forever.It's not particularly crazy. It's been the most likely timeframe for sport franchises over the past years.
fecking hell.I like him as a poster but I found out he financially benefitted from the City takeover through gentrification months ago so all this moral talk is laughable in my eyes.
All this talk and there’s only one poster who had money placed in his pocket through oil money and it’s not the posters replying to jabs about morals!
So if I levered 99.99% it’s allowed?No, not a fully leveraged buyout
Liverpool fans and players stayed loyal to suarez after his racism, just because it was loyalty doesn't make it morality. Support for a club is usually hardwired from youth, people don't hate Liverpool because of morality issues, they hate them because they're a rival club. People across the morality spectrum support clubs, its hardly as if all united fans share the same morality, or all Liverpool fans share the same moralityFor some, evidently not. To say that to a tweet I’ve posted where the MUST Chaimen literally has a massive thread explaining this very thing is weird though. For a lot of people it is.
People are genuinely like “Yeah, I’ve been a United supporter all my life and remain loyal and hate certain clubs and love the homegrown players but it’s nothing to do with morals.”
No it doesn't mean that. Just means that glazers also voted for the proposal, ironically, given how they acquired the club.
Twitter says it’s Qatar soonCan we stop talking about who has the moral high ground here. Any feckin updates ?? What’s twatter saying? Give us tonight’s gossip.
Fixed that for you.Again, support who you want. However when you say that people leaving their lifelong club who they love because of morally reprehensible owners are “pissing away” their support - that’s why I find you antagonistic.
ThisCan we stop talking about who has the moral high ground here. Any feckin updates ?? What’s twatter saying? Give us tonight’s gossip.
That.This
Gossip from NickSpeed10 is that trading will be halted tomorrow and Raine will make an announcement that Jassim has won it.Can we stop talking about who has the moral high ground here. Any feckin updates ?? What’s twatter saying? Give us tonight’s gossip.
To be fair Spoons those purchases don't materialize out of thin air. For every share acquired, someone was willing to sell at that price. Swings and roundabouts etc.2.5m traded today. Seems to be more interest than usual these last few days.
true though. Keep popping in to see if there is any updates and find a million posts about morals.Can we stop talking about who has the moral high ground here. Any feckin updates ?? What’s twatter saying? Give us tonight’s gossip.
The fact the share prices hasn’t fallen significantly like all the previous spikes we’ve seen is very interesting…Twitter says it’s Qatar soon
Forbes says earnings report is due this week. If there's no announcement by then, i think price will fall.The fact the share prices hasn’t fallen significantly like all the previous spikes we’ve seen is very interesting…
Feels like something is coming soon.