Can you tell us the outcome? Twitter can only go so far unless younare a member whereas The Athletic is a paywall.
What is the outcome of their investigation?
I have noticed MOTD do cut anti-Glazer noise down, though.
They emphasise three times and United's response.
1 - Ten Hag leaving the pitch after the Forest game. Martinez, then Casemiro then ETH leaving the pitch. State that ETH actually left before the players did and that the audio was a continuation of the Casemiro clip through ETHs walk-off where chants should have been heard. United said they used the audio from previous clips for continuation.
2 - Casemiro unveiling. United's twitter was full of chants of 'United, United'. Shows evidence in replies of the actual audio that should have been captured from crowd and also from Sky Sports where We Want Glazers Out was chanted. United blamed it on positioning of microphones.
3 - Teams coming out against Arsenal - Antony debut. No chanting heard on United's twitter under the commentators voice. Videos in comments of loud We Want Glazers Out chants. Again, club say it's positioning of microphones. They do not, however, rule out that editing may take place.
Sky also received complaints about quietening the chants but they say they don't and only quieten some to protect young viewers. Club also say they don't have a policy of censoring audio, other than to remove offensive language to protect younger fans.