Felt a bit weirded out by the Qatar interest when Jassim didn't even bother turning up to any of the rounds to negotiate while Ratcliffe did.
Then we heard annoying Qatar media soundbites saying Manchester United is Qatari.
Now we are hearing how it's our loss and they were our only shot at narrowing the gap.
I dont enjoy being claimed by a state and trying to be forced to feel like we depended on them for glory. Go feck yourselves, we are a big club and ultimately need owners with some money and some football sense. If INEOS can bring that then its worlds better than what we had. Go make PSG more of a circus, bellends.
Easier said than done. Yes, we used to be a huge club who used to compete with Real for the most revenue & valued club. Are we anymore?
Another 10 years like this, we would be Liverpool of 90s and City will take the the spot of us with their endless money.
People are supporting Qatar not because they are state owned but they are buying 100% and have the money to invest on and off field. If it was someone else who is willing to do the same, people will support them too. End of the day we want out club back to top.
Now can Jim do that is a hypothetical question. He is a minority owner with the full takeover to take atleast 3-5 years. Ok, he may have the sporting control but that's just a fancy term. What does that actually mean ? We need investment on and off the field, right now. Not after some years.
If the debt is on INEOS, how will that be accepted by the INEOS board ? You have a group of shareholders to answer to. You just can't put a huge debt on some company just because you own it. Which mean, you will have a payment due to the parent company. Assuming it's interest free, it would be still be 50m for 20 years that's coming from our revenue.
To be honest I don't know. I am disappointed that Jassim didn't do enough to get this done but Glazers aren't easy to work with either. They never wanted to sell 100 %.