Honestly baffled at people not wanting Gill back in the fold. He was an outstanding CEO for us.Gill should be nowhere near the club rebuild.
Honestly baffled at people not wanting Gill back in the fold. He was an outstanding CEO for us.Gill should be nowhere near the club rebuild.
I honestly doubt that any of the former management, including SAF, have what it takes to change this club. We need fresh blood by people who have done their job very well in the past 10 yearsHonestly baffled at people not wanting Gill back in the fold. He was an outstanding CEO for us.
Precisely, they aren't officially in place yet.So currently we've got No1 in place yet, CEO, sporting director or head of recruitment.
INEOS had months while waiting for the deal to go through that they could've lined people up, so would've thought it happens quickly when they're officially in place. Let's see.
Was he?Honestly baffled at people not wanting Gill back in the fold. He was an outstanding CEO for us.
In my opinion, David Gill is the CEO version of Gary Neville. He's loyal, he's stable and he's uninspiring. On the upsideYou or me could have been in charge and had a successful period while Sir Alex was in charge.
The club would have been successful if Woodward was in charge while Sir Alex was manager.
Gil should be used as much as possible. Why would people not want this?Honestly baffled at people not wanting Gill back in the fold. He was an outstanding CEO for us.
And you think he will just come in and continue where he left off 10 years ago?Gill would be a very, very poor choice of CEO. The club was stagnating long before SAF retired, in no small part due to Gill.
The return of Ed WoodwardThey're talking about entrusting a headhunting firm to appoint a new CEO, which I think is probably a good move unless they decide to promote one of Baty or Stewart. For the sanity of the casual observer, I hope they go with the headhunting firm and bring in a external candidate. This also doesn't mean that INEOS won't have sporting control, but there is a difference between who the board of directors are, and the people who direct the football side of the club. The Glazers will for sure have a say on who the CEO is.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
You said it yourself that they’re not in place officially yet as they need to do the first owner test thing first but the fact Blanc and Brailsford are openly attending United matches says they’ll be involved in some form even if it’s through Ineos rather than on the United payroll, if Gill is on the United payroll but Blanc and Brailsford are used through Ineos then it’s a clever move by Ratcliffe to get around certain rules and regulations.So currently we've got No1 in place yet, CEO, sporting director or head of recruitment.
INEOS had months while waiting for the deal to go through that they could've lined people up, so would've thought it happens quickly when they're officially in place. Let's see.
I posted a while ago about too many cooks in the kitchen. One of the reasons was that I couldn’t see what role Blanc would be doing as a CEO… if he’s just negotiating transfers and only involved in football etc then it’s not really a CEO. And if he’s only involved in football then his ideas / opinions could conflict with with all the other people linked eg Answorth & Mitchell etcThis has flattened the optimism a bit
Problem with Gill is he is also very stingy. At least Ed Woodward understood the commercial value of marquee players.. it’s just that he signed the wrong ones. Gill from my understanding refused Aguero due to the cost being too high.Think about it
a- He was alongside Brailsford during the last game
b- He has worked under the Glazers and he's got SAF's support
c- He's experienced and lead us to a successful period during a time when we were tight
The return of Ed Woodward
Whatever the case I'm happy that they're looking to recruit the best in class football brains to run the show. That's all I care for now. Glazers or no glazers, I want to see a clear identity in our football and it looks like we're going to be building one.The Glazers put Ineos in place and let them run the club for them. Why is everyone pretending Ineos/Sir Jim runs the show now. They dont. Its still the Glazers. If Sir Jim is successful its because of the Glazers. I know its hard to hear but truth is truth.
Wasn't he hounded out of Ajax because of the terrible job he did there?Edwin Van Der Sar anyone?
Although he will have to undertake 70 lashes, one for each million he made United spend on Antony.
I am struggling to think about internal appointment. If they were any good they would have been noticed a long time ago. External appointment makes more senseThey're talking about entrusting a headhunting firm to appoint a new CEO, which I think is probably a good move unless they decide to promote one of Baty or Stewart. For the sanity of the casual observer, I hope they go with the headhunting firm and bring in a external candidate. This also doesn't mean that INEOS won't have sporting control, but there is a difference between who the board of directors are, and the people who direct the football side of the club. The Glazers will for sure have a say on who the CEO is.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Will get one but may not be Blanc nowSo we having a CEO or nah?
Then he will align perfectly to what the Glazers and Ineos want given our financial situationProblem with Gill is he is also very stingy. At least Ed Woodward understood the commercial value of marquee players.. it’s just that he signed the wrong ones. Gill from my understanding refused Aguero due to the cost being too high.
Nope, i think he'll be worseAnd you think he will just come in and continue where he left off 10 years ago?
I believe that was the Glazer shackles beginning to peer through.Gill would be a very, very poor choice of CEO. The club was stagnating long before SAF retired, in no small part due to Gill.
He also praised the Glazers.Ferguson had nothing but praise for David Gill. I'll go with the legendary football manager.
And recommended MoyesHe also praised the Glazers.
Just curious, why?Gill should be nowhere near the club rebuild.
United was in a near impossible situation. They knew that SAF carried most of the football structure of the club by his own and that if he leaves then the whole structure would fall. The legend had done things the way he did since forever, he was in no mood to change his ways and at his age he could easily say 'feck it, I am retiring' if irked. I understand him more then others because the company I worked for was in a very similar situation.Gill would be a very, very poor choice of CEO. The club was stagnating long before SAF retired, in no small part due to Gill.
INEOS Infants?So if Ratcliffe comes in and starts promoting a lot of youth into the team, similar to Fergie's Fledglings or Busby's babes, are they going to be called Racliffe's rats? This one bit worries me...
Van Der Sar was CEO when Ajax suffered the biggest meltdown for the past 30 years. He had since suffered brain haemorrhage whom he's recovering from it. That might be down to stress. Do we really want to put someone's life in danger cause let's face it, United is a stressful place to work in.Edwin Van Der Sar anyone?
Although he will have to undertake 70 lashes, one for each million he made United spend on Antony.
Didn't know Ratcliffe was gonna replace Ten Hag as manager!So if Ratcliffe comes in and starts promoting a lot of youth into the team, similar to Fergie's Fledglings or Busby's babes, are they going to be called Racliffe's rats? This one bit worries me...