Flopped in thegame in ROme vs Barcelona, Flopped against Atletico and then Flopped against Atleti again? When his team needed him? Every Madrid player scored their pen. Yes at United he was a good dribbler but even there against elite opposition he didn't do well.
Barcelona semis in 08, Milan semis 07 etc. He is a good goal scorewr but my problem is when he is called the best footballer when he simply isn't. As I've said beofre, the level he has perfomed at over the last 4- 5 years is no higher than RvN at his best. Was RvN ever called the best player? That is my only gripe. His highest level is nowhere near Ronaldinho's, Messi's, Xavi's, Iniesta etc He needs his team to supply him with chance after chance to be effective. He is not in the same category as Cruijff, Maradona and Messi. Those 3 could be motm without hitting the net. When CR doesn't score, his contribution is almost always nothing.
There's extra pressure when stepping up for the final penalty. I don't agree with your assumption that he was poor in this year's final, 'whoscored' gave him a 7.8 and supports my opinion. But whatever floats you boat, mate.
Turning to Rom 09, BBC:
'Ronaldo, for all his obvious frustrations that ended almost inevitably in a yellow card for a late barge on Carles Puyol, never stopped running but this was not to be his night or United's.'
I wouldn't call that poor, if i remember correctly he was a constant threat. Agree to disagree.
Did RvN manage to score more than 50 goals in six different seasons? I'm not even asking whether it happened consecutively. So i simply disagree with your assumption that over the last 4-5 years his level wasn't better. Ronaldo had 11 assists in La Liga in 15/16, that's RvN's record during his whole time in the Premier League. How was RvN's shooting from outside of the box, could he beat his man in midfield, how about setting up chances for himself?! Maybe Ronaldo has regressed a bit, but he was so much more than only a goal scorer or like some people might call him a 'poacher'.
'He needs his team to supply him with chance after chance to be effective.'
With all due respect, doesn't it count for every player? Football is still a team game and having a guy like Busquets who always has your back is an advantage i wouldn't easily discard.
'When CR doesn't score, his contribution is almost always nothing.'
Every opponent knows how good Ronaldo is. He will always occupy at least two defenders because of his intelligent timed runs. Overall that stuff creates space for your team mates. Simple as.
Frankly i haven't seen Cruijff and Maradona, so i can't compare them to Ronaldo. At his best Messi is the better player, okay, but i don't agree when comparing Iniesta or Xavi to him. They all have different skill sets, but i don't think they are superior to Ronaldo's. But that's just my opinion. How can one convince the other one? Simply can't, so before we're making the rounds, i'm just going to leave this here.
So long!