Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He’s in great shape (for an android) and would absolutely wipe the floor with Musk. So, in a way, it’s a pity we won’t ever get to see the fight happen.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Oh no, he's hot (from the neck down).Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Harsh on @Pogue MahoneHe's a left-leaning centrist, just casually promoting two toxic and dangerous far-right ghouls. Then again, I guess that's been the main function of centrists for the last two or three hundred years.
Harsh on @Pogue Mahone
I've noticed a lot of people like that online. People who claim to be "moderate" "independent" and scoff at being called right wing even though all they ever do is echo right wing talking points and praise people who don't hide being right wing. They act like a twitter account with 60 followers saying something silly is reflective of the entire left but turn a blind eye from the leading politicians on the right having huge scandals.He's a left-leaning centrist, just casually promoting two toxic and dangerous far-right ghouls. Then again, I guess that's been the main function of centrists for the last two or three hundred years.
I think the difference is between self proclaiming yourself centrist (or independent) versus people whose voting history implies they are centrist or independent. I think the latter group of people are lean-left now so people like Musk who represent the other side are out of touch. For example the right's tax policy may be unchanged from ten years ago but ten years ago it was the bread and butter policy whereas now it is relegated to culture war stuff. I think in elections those voters in the middle see culture war and are turned off but guys like Musk are excited by it.Lets be honest, people who call themselves centrists are obviously right wing, you just have to talk to them for 5 minutes.
I remember at the height of Gamergate, that big nothing-story that more or less started the online woman-hating incel, red-pill movement. Or if not started, then at least catapulted into the spotlight. There was a poll on the main subreddit, and almost everyone considered themselves left of centre, liberals, progressive, etc. It was completely absurd.I've noticed a lot of people like that online. People who claim to be "moderate" "independent" and scoff at being called right wing even though all they ever do is echo right wing talking points and praise people who don't hide being right wing. They act like a twitter account with 60 followers saying something silly is reflective of the entire left but turn a blind eye from the leading politicians on the right having huge scandals.
I've never seen this equivalent of people do it the other way around.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
In what way? Most studies say the opposite.A lot of 'centrists' probably would have been considered liberal 10 years ago. The left has changed quite a bit over those years.
How so?A lot of 'centrists' probably would have been considered liberal 10 years ago. The left has changed quite a bit over those years.
As the right has gotten more right wing the left has gotten more left wingHow so?
I really don't think so.As the right has gotten more right wing the left has gotten more left wing
In my opinion, the whole spectrum had moved to the right.As the right has gotten more right wing the left has gotten more left wing
Hardly.As the right has gotten more right wing the left has gotten more left wing
Nah.As the right has gotten more right wing the left has gotten more left wing
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
If people fine with Tucker and/or Tate would have been considered liberal 10 years ago, I feel like that label was not that useful then.A lot of 'centrists' probably would have been considered liberal 10 years ago. The left has changed quite a bit over those years.
Same here. I don't know what took me so long but I finally realized that the only enjoyment I got out of having an account was to block idiots with a blue checkmark, and as far as enjoyment goes that doesn't reach very high..Closed my account yesterday, the bad started to outweigh the good too consistently recently.
In what way? Most studies say the opposite.
I haven't seen any studies on the subject. Just what I see talked about online. I see the far right being as racist and homophobic as they always have been. I don't see much change there. The big thing I've noticed is the current gender identity/sex culture war. This conversation has gotten a lot bigger over the last few years. You're deemed to be far right/a Nazi if you're not in 100% agreement with the far left on it.How so?
I am not sure what you mean by this. If you don't believe Twitter was an echo chamber for far left liberals before Elon, I don't know what to say. Conservatives are allowed to post and don't seem to get suppressed any more.I hope the answer is as insightful as "before Elon conservatives were mostly banned on Twitter".
I don't know that much about either of them in all honesty. I don't follow either of them. I am also not saying that Elon is a centrist. I have no idea what his politics are. My post was purely based on the trends I have noticed mostly on Twitter over the last few years.If people fine with Tucker and/or Tate would have been considered liberal 10 years ago, I feel like that label was not that useful then.
You're wrong, and the data proved you wrong long before Elon even took over. Research has shown that right-wing viewpoints were amplified, and certainly not suppressed. The only ones who were "suppressed" were the likes of Trump, right around the time when he tried to convince a mob to overthrow a fair election. "Conservatives are allowed to post" is an absurd way to describe the current state of Twitter.I am not sure what you mean by this. If you don't believe Twitter was an echo chamber for far left liberals before Elon, I don't know what to say. Conservatives are allowed to post and don't seem to get suppressed any more.
Absolute hysterical horseshit.You're deemed to be far right/a Nazi if you're not in 100% agreement with the far left on it.
There it is. The favourite phrase of everyone who ever comes in to defend Musk, Peterson, Tate, etc.I don't know that much about either of them in all honesty. I don't follow either of them. I am also not saying that Elon is a centrist. I have no idea what his politics are. My post was purely based on the trends I have noticed mostly on Twitter over the last few years.
Okay. It was my personal experience on the site. I see far more conservatives views when I scroll down my feed than I ever did before Musk. I can see both sides in my 'for you' feed.You're wrong, and the data proved you wrong long before Elon even took over. Research has shown that right-wing viewpoints were amplified, and certainly not suppressed. The only ones who were "suppressed" were the likes of Trump, right around the time when he tried to convince a mob to overthrow a fair election. "Conservatives are allowed to post" is an absurd way to describe the current state of Twitter.
It is not. I see it on Twitter whenever I view any kind of discussion on the subject.Absolute hysterical horseshit.
You don't even know me. I haven't defended any of those people.There it is. The favourite phrase of everyone who ever comes in to defend Musk, Peterson, Tate, etc.
Thanks for answering. My impression is that you took the wrong conclussions from the Brexit voting and Twitter. Twitter works as an eco chamber, where you keep seeing the content you're most likely to interact with. The Brexit voting was always going to be very close, with the previous polling showing no side having a clear advantage (at least over the margin of error). Leave barely won due to, IMO, an "ashamed voter" effect that wasn't captured by polling. But that has existed from centuries and had nothing to do with Twitter.When the Brexit vote was happening was eye opening to me. Almost all of the content I could see on the site was against Brexit. I thought a no vote was a sure win, because of how much Twitter was against Brexit. It was since then that I fully realised how left wing the site was, and how it didn't seem to correlate with real life.
how you can say leftists are more radical than in the past based on a point that is not comparable as the gender identity situation was non existent in the mainstream?I haven't seen any studies on the subject. Just what I see talked about online. I see the far right being as racist and homophobic as they always have been. I don't see much change there. The big thing I've noticed is the current gender identity/sex culture war. This conversation has gotten a lot bigger over the last few years. You're deemed to be far right/a Nazi if you're not in 100% agreement with the far left on it.