Cantonagotmehere
Full Member
That's a lot posts for a newb......wonder why?Great fans
That's a lot posts for a newb......wonder why?Great fans
It's a bigger circus because of Sancho..You don't agree that it's made a bigger circus than we already had? Ok then.
I'm guessing Sancho and ETH had already discussed it behind closed doors so it should have been left at that. Going to the media doesn't mean you have more authority. It achieved nothing and just created more problems. And now he seemingly has a player that he has even less authority over after it all.
Like I said earlier, Sancho has previous for doing this and it was seemingly quite obvious what would happen once ETH spoke to the media about it. I just find it irritating as it's bad enough as it is and this seemed an avoidable situation.It's a bigger circus because of Sancho..
Keep quiet and prove that you are good .and deserve to be selected ..
You don't go online posting things..
He said nothing wrong.. Well Sancho isn't the best 4 wingers we have , so prove that you are better than Antony, Rashford, and Garnacho ..
Guy was defending Ole like one of his kids and he's going at EtH over this as if he's violated another one@mu4c_20le is an absolute troll, pay no attention to his posts is the best thing you can do
Yeah I was thinking that as well after listening to the same question asked 10 different ways…Who the feck is the press officer? Why were these eejits allowed to ask so many questions about Sancho?
This is daft. Rashford was one of our best players last year.I find it difficult to work out who is who between Sancho and Rashford when they’re both on the pitch as they’re both useless.
O'Hara is like Agbonlahor in that they were average players with little insight into the game but they can be used for trolling which makes them perfect for Talksport. The goal is to annoy people so they call in.Is this Talksport guy the same Jamie O'Hara who used to play for Spurs? Who cares what he thinks?
Agreed.Anyone defending Sancho in this is a clown.
Rashford assisted Sancho against Southampton, season before last.I'm a bit annoyed at Rashford. He was leading the charge to get Sancho here, they're friends and they played together for England. And they have zero chemistry together on the pitch. I don't even remember them passing to each other in any substantial way
Let's get one thing straight here, I wanted ETH. You wanted Ralf. And probably still butthurt at being proven wrong about him because you only defended him because you hated Ole so much.Guy was defending Ole like one of his kids and he's going at EtH over this as if he's violated another one
That, or maybe he'll be demonstrating to Murtough and Arnold, that is how you do a clear out.Mate, if Ten Hag pulls his pants down and take a dump in the centre of the pitch that would be one of more positive news from the club in the last months.
What image?
The only straight thing in that post is its straight insanityLet's get one thing straight here, I wanted ETH. You wanted Ralf. And probably still butthurt at being proven wrong about him because you only defended him because you hated Ole so much.
You have issues my guy
Dunno if this was posted before but here's a telling extract from his interview with the independent:Is this Talksport guy the same Jamie O'Hara who used to play for Spurs? Who cares what he thinks?
Exactly. Players can understand special treatment for others when the one receiving it has earned itEric was given that leeway because Fergie right from the start, trusted him, and very quickly his team mates trusted him. And his team mates of course trusted Fergie. And Eric, being an honourable man, wanted to repay that trust. And did, in spades. That's why it worked, I believe. A zillion miles from Sancho.
The last part being the most important. You lose any sort of goodwill or benefit of the doubt when you are ineffective on the pitch and then fail to show any sort of desire/responsibility/professionalism off it. At that point Ten Hag can say whatever the feck he wants and I won’t blame him for it. A player wants to act like a child then he deserves to be chastised like one.Agreed.
There's no defence.
- He shouldn't have tweeted what he did
- He should have apologised when asked
- His performances have been poor the entire time he's been here (under Ole, Ralf and ETH)
- He's apparently not even acting professionally which is something a non-league player could do
Since when did not being the main man at a title winning side = completely useless?Yep as we haven’t had a decent striker in….. years have we. One that is here for the long term hopefully Hojlund.
And it’s nothing to do with being edgy, it’s about having a standard of how the club and players should be performing. And no disrepect to Rashford fan boys but he won’t be the main man in any title winning side.
Squad, yes.Since when did not being the main man at a title winning side = completely useless?
Rashford has his faults, but he did score 30 goals last season and is far from being classified as useless.
Rashford would have been in every single premier league title winning squad we've ever had over the years, it's not even a debate.
I agree, if we can't afford to keep a wasteful player as a luxury item, there's no way a mid-table team or lower will take what could be a costly risk in a viciously competitive league.He'll never thrive in England. He'll thrive in Germany again or another less competitive League and even then it'll only be for one of the top teams there. The lad has zero intensity. For some reason I keep thinking about all our fans laughing at Anderson. For perspective Anderson is a bit of a joke but had twice the mentality of Sancho and Ando didn't have the best mentality. Sancho is simply a bust. Pep and City not being bothered to keep him should have been warning enough.
Nah, different league this jadon fella, more like JS.SquaredHe's JLingz 2.0
Would have been 1st XI in 2013 and 2011.Squad, yes.
First 11, no.
But I agree he’s far from useless.
So you expect a manager to start watching what he says because of fear of how one of his players may react? Once you go down that path you lose the dressing room completely.Like I said earlier, Sancho has previous for doing this and it was seemingly quite obvious what would happen once ETH spoke to the media about it. I just find it irritating as it's bad enough as it is and this seemed an avoidable situation.
That's how I see it, I think having a holiday in the time approved by my contract is my entitlement.Football is a job, but it is not a normal one. Sancho is competing in his job with some other players to become one of the selected first 11, and on top of that in theory he is in competition with several other players for a spot in the national team. It's absolutely normal for players to do more than absolutely required from them, because it is in their own interest to improve. What Sancho does sends the message, that he doesn't care (much) for his personal improvement, and that rubs people the wrong way.
You can't keep babying non-punctual players especially when their performances don't merit any slack or leeway.Like I said earlier, Sancho has previous for doing this and it was seemingly quite obvious what would happen once ETH spoke to the media about it. I just find it irritating as it's bad enough as it is and this seemed an avoidable situation.
Oh wow! That's comedy calcio gold. All went a bit 'Unterfall' didn’t it?
Yeh I know, it's painful to readGuy was defending Ole like one of his kids and he's going at EtH over this as if he's violated another one
.....who are on 350K a week. Seriously.....that is the problem with these shite players, always being handled with kids gloves, who then walk all over their manager. Feck them.....half these cnuts would of been gone already if Fergie were still around.You can't keep babying non-punctual players especially when their performances don't merit any slack or leeway.
Media drive the narratives. A bit different when "sources say" than being confirmed by Ten Hag himself.Shows our standards, we knew what he was like and still brought him.
Joking apart, people in the scene talk. Ten Hag going public would have changed nothing.
What ETH originally said wasn't even that bad of a comment. He just said he had a poor training week. Sancho blew it up into something bigger than what it initially was.You don't agree that it's made a bigger circus than we already had? Ok then.
I'm guessing Sancho and ETH had already discussed it behind closed doors so it should have been left at that. Going to the media doesn't mean you have more authority. It achieved nothing and just created more problems. And now he seemingly has a player that he has even less authority over after it all.
Did he even say that? I thought he made a generic statement that squad was selected based on training performance.What ETH originally said wasn't even that bad of a comment. He just said he had a poor training week. Sancho blew it up into something bigger than what it initially was.
Here is the quote :Did he even say that? I thought he made a generic statement that squad was selected based on training performance.
Both Giggs and Park were integral part of our success reaching CL final and winning PL in 2011, aint no way Rashford replaced them from starting xi. I dont remember Youngy ever became integral part of Fergie last winning team due to his injury that season but considering we just signed RvP and what Fergie said to his players i doubt hed like seeing Rashford ignoring RvP just to try to score from impossible angle.Would have been 1st XI in 2013 and 2011.
He easily displaces Young on the left in 2013 and Park/Giggs on the left in 2011.
Thanks for the quote.Here is the quote :
"On his performance on training we didn't select him," the manager said. "You have to reach the level every day at Manchester United. You can make choices in the front line, so in this game, he wasn't selected." That said as a response to why Sancho is not in the squad.
The only option EtH had to somewhat diffuse the situation was dodging the question, which would have been a red flag for journos as well. I see people suggesting that he lied about injury or something but that would have been futile. Taking his reaction into consideration, we can safely assume that Sancho would have posted something along the lines of 'I'm in perfect condition and ready to play but baldy does not like me. For ages I've been rumored to have spaghetti for bones and soapstone for ligaments. I've been villainized by the club and chefs all around the world for over 40 years now and it needs to stop.'
This is the end for him. Only reason he might be an United player come next season is of his obscene wages. It has been stipulated that he will be back in the team if he apologizes but I don't think EtH gives two shits about that. Sancho needs to become a different person to be back and he is incapable/unwilling of doing so. The boy is a multimillionaire in his early 20s and doesn't have a reason to change. We will move him on and he will still play for a decent team for decent wages while not changing a single thing.
This is from your FIFA game?I find it difficult to work out who is who between Sancho and Rashford when they’re both on the pitch as they’re both useless.
Not by HIS actions no. The main point was a manager should not only criticise when things are going well, that is called weak management.You don't agree that it's made a bigger circus than we already had? Ok then.
I'm guessing Sancho and ETH had already discussed it behind closed doors so it should have been left at that. Going to the media doesn't mean you have more authority. It achieved nothing and just created more problems. And now he seemingly has a player that he has even less authority over after it all.
I find it difficult to work out who is who between Sancho and Rashford when they’re both on the pitch as they’re both useless.
Teams don't buy players off the media, they don't need the daily mail to tell them what a player is like. EtH saying to the media he hasn't been training well isn't going to be news to anyone in football circles. Everyone knows what his attitude is like which is why its surprising we signed him, especially as City said no thanks to having him back.Media drive the narratives. A bit different when "sources say" than being confirmed by Ten Hag himself.