diarm
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2014
- Messages
- 16,790
I'd never heard of Ronaldo or Kanchelskis before we signed them either.Here's our RW lads, some dude none of us have heard of.
I'd never heard of Ronaldo or Kanchelskis before we signed them either.Here's our RW lads, some dude none of us have heard of.
Prime Kanchelskis was an excellent player, so if Pelistri is anything like him it’s not badI'd never heard of Ronaldo or Kanchelskis before we signed them either.
To be fair, a middle aged lady from 1896 would do a better job on the right wing than Dan James.He's got hair like a middle aged lady from 1896.
Wouldn’t be immediate then?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This is Dan James all over againWouldn’t be immediate then?
Southampton.where was Williams going???
Not exactly stuck his neck out has he? All stuff we already know but the definite deals are 'should' and the definite no deal is '99%' and Pellestri is 'could' because there hasn't been much coverage on it. Not sure this guy is worth taking any notice of tbh.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I doubt the decision makers at the club even know the answer to this just yet.Would we sign both this guy and Traore, or do we think it's a one or the other kinda thing?
Both look advanced.Would we sign both this guy and Traore, or do we think it's a one or the other kinda thing?
Both, I reckon.Would we sign both this guy and Traore, or do we think it's a one or the other kinda thing?
They're both 18 aren't they? Wouldn't expect much of an impact this season given one hasn't got game time at Atalanta the other hasn't played in a good league. But as for young talents the more the merrier. We have got a lack of quality wide players at the football club. Every good one in the first team is a striker anyway.Would we sign both this guy and Traore, or do we think it's a one or the other kinda thing?
I am assuming we are hoping one of them becomes good enough for us long term, so the combined investment across the two is justified.Would we sign both this guy and Traore, or do we think it's a one or the other kinda thing?
I won't say it too loudly but I do think our attacking options are suddenly looking a lot healthier, even with having to wait until January for Traore.I am assuming we are hoping one of them becomes good enough for us long term, so the combined investment across the two is justified.
Yeah would find it much easier to get on board if we had bought a leader at CB and a mobile DM tooLook if we had a 'proper' window this signing along with Traore would be exciting.
This kid is very highly rated, he probably wont be ready yet but he's one for the future.
Shame the board fecked about and didn't improve the starting 11.
The original source literally said he's had the 2nd part of his medical this morning and is set to sign a 5 year deal.I'm worried that this deal isn't getting done - literally no new updates from anyone who is halfway clued in today.
Might have been between him and Traore.I'm worried that this deal isn't getting done - literally no new updates from anyone who is halfway clued in today.
Or not.The original source literally said he's had the 2nd part of his medical this morning and is set to sign a 5 year deal.
For context:The original source literally said he's had the 2nd part of his medical this morning and is set to sign a 5 year deal.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Oh, fantastic, thank you my friend!The original source literally said he's had the 2nd part of his medical this morning and is set to sign a 5 year deal.
Hirst and others also reported this deal.For context:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
But I personally reckon it's another Reguilón situation where the local press hype it up but it doesn't happen.
How? James played very well against City when he was at Swansea. Bielsa wants to sign him, tried once and failed, now tried to sign him again, which shows he is also rated highly.It's evident on the latest highlight reels posted on YouTube that this kid has a lot more about him than Daniel James. That doesn't mean he'll make it here, but he's a more talented player for sure so people need to cut it out with the comparisons.
Neither of these players will offer anything for 20/21 and anything they deliver in 21/22 is a bonus too. That doesn't make them bad investments, but they are no where near the level to be playing PL and CL football.I won't say it too loudly but I do think our attacking options are suddenly looking a lot healthier, even with having to wait until January for Traore.
Yep his dribbling at speed but with high agility is something very similar Giggs isn't it? nice comparison.He looks like a 17 year old version of Giggs in the videos.
Great hair.
This looks to be a good signing. He looks to have a real touch of class about him.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
From YouTube scouting?This looks to be a good signing. He looks to have a real touch of class about him.
From a youtube video i have seen that Pellistri is not good enough. Decent closecontrol and mobility, but good luck against players that does not rush blindly against him. Compare him to that Norwegian buy that signed for Milan for 5mill euros...From YouTube scouting?
From the all touches vids posted earlier in the thread.From YouTube scouting?
One is 3 years younger than the other.From a youtube video i have seen that Pellistri is not good enough. Decent closecontrol and mobility, but good luck against players that does not rush blindly against him. Compare him to that Norwegian buy that signed for Milan for 5mill euros...