- Joined
- Jan 14, 2010
- Messages
- 30,500
- Supports
- Everton
Obviously since I posted that we now have 2 wins in 7 and are now only 2 points in front with one game in hand.
I think this is also what frustrated me about the Journeyman save I was doing. I don't want to go to every club and have to completely change the squad.The AI can’t make good transfers themselves and end up with a squad full of 30+ aged players.
I just about scraped past a Lyon side in the CL that had a 36 year old TAA and a 35 year old Sancho. Their starting XI also had 5 other players over 34.I do think the only way to keep the game competitive is to use the in game editor. The AI can’t make good transfers themselves and end up with a squad full of 30+ aged players.
They also seem to struggle to develop younger players, more so this year as players age a lot better than they used to.
That start of the season team meeting is going to be a bit awkward.So Dusseldorf won the league with the press asking me if my loan player had outgrown them.. I won the Cup again anyway. However, Bayern sacked their manager after finishing third and want me as the replacement. Do I go or do I stick with Hertha?
I love saves like that. Being better than everyone for significantly less money.
I think if people are upset in regards to the tweet from SI then fair enough. I just don't personally see it as a massive deal.I completely disagree but it is what it is.
I think you raise some fair points here and it does toe the line when it comes to realism, but as we have all seen I imagine, it's possible to do some very unrealistic things. Your Austria Wien example and my current Dulwich save can attest to that. I know they're possible but in the real world the chances for that are slim. I think in regards to the YR going up slowly, I agree that should be an option, but there should probably be an option for players who don't go 20+ seasons deep. I think seeing a decent change at 10+ seasons would be fair as an option.I think if people are upset in regards to the tweet from SI then fair enough. I just don't personally see it as a massive deal.
YR is part of multiple factors that contribute to the quality regens. Changing that alone isn't really a huge change on reflection and I think people including myself are guilty of getting overexcited. I regularly do BAN type saves and I fully understand that you need to have things like the right game importance, facilities, economic factors in the nation etc.
I personally think they are in a weird spot of trying to make a realistic game and one that appeals to casual players. Let's assume DYR works as anticipated, how long should it take to increase the number and also how many people will actually be willing to put in 50 years in-game to get a somewhat marginal increase? My idea of it is that it should be very slow. I think over 15-20 years it should only really go up by 3/4/5 points. If it's too quick then it would take all of the enjoyment out of it and would be too easy and overpowered. That's what I meant when I said I thought they were being cautious. I think in the future they will make things like 'game importance' and 'economic development' dynamic in line with YR but to change them all at the same time could potentially have been game-breaking if they got it wrong si I understood why they appear to be somewhat cautious.
What I don't like about Zealand's video is he provided zero evidence that it didn't work (like he claimed) and basically just called them out. I can understand them not really being happy with him because it was pretty clickbaity and exaggerated. I've seen a clip of him on streaming basically saying what they said in the tweet wasn't really wrong.
You look at how it was marketed. It wasn't listed as a major feature and was tweeted by Miles as he does with the countless other smaller features. I really don't think calling them liars is fair. At the same time, I think they should now release something to clear all the confusion up that the whole thing has caused.
It is a pretty weird balance that they are trying to find. As you say there are many things already in the game that are pretty unrealistic as it is. The main one being attributes. I'd like to see them 'refresh' the formula that dictates how and why quality regens are produced.I think you raise some fair points here and it does toe the line when it comes to realism, but as we have all seen I imagine, it's possible to do some very unrealistic things. Your Austria Wien example and my current Dulwich save can attest to that. I know they're possible but in the real world the chances for that are slim. I think in regards to the YR going up slowly, I agree that should be an option, but there should probably be an option for players who don't go 20+ seasons deep. I think seeing a decent change at 10+ seasons would be fair as an option.
Agreed regarding them needing to come out with a video. The situation needs more nuance to it than a forum post, tweet or comment will allow. Yes, I think that the Zealand title was very Youtube but also very sueable.It is a pretty weird balance that they are trying to find. As you say there are many things already in the game that are pretty unrealistic as it is. The main one being attributes. I'd like to see them 'refresh' the formula that dictates how and why quality regens are produced.
Will be interesting to see what their response is, whether they actually do make some kind of proper response and explain it properly outside of on the forum.
I'm quite curious to see how they handle Zealand in the future also, people have been sued for less and what he said is potentially defamatory. I think they'll freeze him out a bit and not give him early access like before.
I wouldn't be surprised if they squeezed him aka told him to change the title / remove the video.Suing one of the biggest FM content creators over that would be a pretty daft thing to do. Though if we're judging by the fact they created a game where the press constantly suggest that your 40+ goal striker isn't a good fit for your team, I look forward to the court case.
Currently set up with a 3 of@Maluco Sounds like you need a bit of luck to crack Europe and you just aren't getting it yet! Definitely worth weighing up another project if you get the right offer.
As an aside, anyone ever had success with an AP in a CM role rather than AM? Struggling to make it work this year. I've actually had most success using CMs in the standard CM role funnily enough.
it’s odd as aside from that we obviously do well with the tactic I use but I can never seem to get the AP to have a high rating or perform well despite everyone else in the team doing so.Currently set up with a 3 of
AP - - - Mez
BWM
Worked well for me at Slovan Bratislava, will have to see how in goes at CSKA. We did win our first game 8-0 though.
I do:@Maluco Sounds like you need a bit of luck to crack Europe and you just aren't getting it yet! Definitely worth weighing up another project if you get the right offer.
As an aside, anyone ever had success with an AP in a CM role rather than AM? Struggling to make it work this year. I've actually had most success using CMs in the standard CM role funnily enough.
Yeah, it’s hard to explain. I can’t really complain because of the consistency of trophies (World Club Cup and Super Cup added already this season), but it’s hard to understand.@Maluco Sounds like you need a bit of luck to crack Europe and you just aren't getting it yet! Definitely worth weighing up another project if you get the right offer.
As an aside, anyone ever had success with an AP in a CM role rather than AM? Struggling to make it work this year. I've actually had most success using CMs in the standard CM role funnily enough.
I used to use IW’s but I switched to IF and AF and I was much better. I think the AF us the best ST role again.I do:
PF (s)
IW (a) ------------------- IW (a)
DLP (s) ------- MEZ (a)
DM (d)
WB (s) BPD (d) BPD (d) WB (s)
SK (d)
For a while I used an asymmetric one where one side would have a classic winger ahead of a fullback, and the side with the inverted winger to have a mezzala (with the midfielder on his stronger foot side to basically add to natural side width). Eventually player selection forced me into this but it works best so I've stuck with it.
The DLP and PF are the 2 positions who I always feel like don't do as well statistically as they should. Haller with Ajax in my first season and Lewandowski later as a striker were the only ones who excelled there, the rest are supporting roles for the wingers I feel like.
I think so. AF with the pass ball into space option in tactics seems a bit OP.I used to use IW’s but I switched to IF and AF and I was much better. I think the AF us the best ST role again.
I have 1 IW and 1 Winger with an AF. My IW players get quite a lot of goals. Haven't actually tried them as IF this save though.I used to use IW’s but I switched to IF and AF and I was much better. I think the AF us the best ST role again.
I used IF's at the start but they just basically poached goals and didn't do much else. The balance with IW's feels better. I tend to switch up my striker to an AF, but yeah it does seem to be more consistent. I'm not sure how my team does overall but the striker definitely gets more goals.I used to use IW’s but I switched to IF and AF and I was much better. I think the AF us the best ST role again.
Yeah they’re just glorified poachers. I hate using wide players now and just stick to a diamond midfieldI used IF's at the start but they just basically poached goals and didn't do much else. The balance with IW's feels better. I tend to switch up my striker to an AF, but yeah it does seem to be more consistent. I'm not sure how my team does overall but the striker definitely gets more goals.
He's changed the title to 'Dynamic' Youth Rating Doesn't Work.I wouldn't be surprised if they squeezed him aka told him to change the title / remove the video.