Yeah there are a few actors a tier below others. Harrington, Bran, Danerys, and others are categorically in the lower tier. I think that Sansa improved as the series went on.
Well said. For me it comes down to that golden word, and it's one that people like Dance, Headey, Coster-Waldau, Diana Rigg, Sean Bean and Michelle Fairley all had; gravitas. If you can own the scene just by sitting there and in silence eating an orange then you'll shine. Of the new crop you had people like Jack Gleeson and Richard Madden who had it as well but they're long gone. Conleth Hill, Alfie Allen and Peter Dinklage all have a shit ton of it too but nowadays they have to share screen time with the "main cast" (Jon and Dany) whenever they get a line which is like me trying to recite Shakespeare whilst the majority of the time the camera is focusing on an egg.
I think very few in the crypt will survive. I can see the dead already buried down there being raised by the night king or even another WW, culminating in a whole lot of slaughter causing mass panic from within Winterfell.
I get what you mean but that wasn't my point. I wish the characters had a side, good or bad, but they've become watered down disney caricatures.
Seen it all now.
He has a fantastic screen presence and his character is interestingly written. But his performances are quite unnatural. There's rarely a scene where it doesn't look like he's trying to act.
Nope, she's very cute!Am I the only one that wished they showed Arya fully naked?
It's from an earlier episode when Arya was training and the man at the harbor got I think oysters with either vanilla / vinegar, but cause of how he delivered the line it became an online debate on different forums.
Did the old man face the same level of fear, uncertainty and looming death Bran does?
Peter Dinklage is a terrible actor
Outside of Game of Thrones, can you point me to a movie/TV show that demonstrates how good an actor he is?Peter Dinklage is a terrible actor
Also Charles Dance literally plays himself by way of speaking and mannerisms. There is nothing outstanding from his acting in that regard.
That's not true
Don't forget Clarke and Harrington's perfume ads. They couldn't even turn it on for a few seconds. So awkward.
He's meant to be superb in The Station Agent.
If it was, Littlefinger would've burned Neds remains and delivered an urn to Catelyn rather than lugging that enormous case of bones half way across the country in Season 2.
That's not how I'm justifying it. Quite the opposite .
You said
So basically, unless they've other respectable credits to their name it supports the argument they are rubbish.
X-Men Days of Future Past. I didn't see him as Tiryon and he sold himself as a mercenary American scientist really well. Tiryons arc has far more expressions and Peter Dinklage portrayed them really well. My favourite being his reaction when Oberyn confirmed he would be his champion. The gasp of relief was believable, relatable and just a good scene to watch.
That's a question not a justification. My justification was about his natural his acting is.
This is a slightly odd question as Dinklage has generally been critically acclaimed as an actor. So even if we completely accept for argument's sake that he isn't actually any good, people can still easily point to reviews he got in films like The Station Agent to argue the opposite when you ask them to. Whereas your question makes him sound like a Kit Harrington, where you'd be hard pressed to find a performance to (even wrongly) argue was good.
To be fair, it would’ve been between him and Verne Troyer considering the obvious attribute needed for the role...
That's a horrible thing to say... You forgot Warwick Davies.
