And Farage has a 'bit' on his show called Talking Pints where he has a pint with a guest and talks about crap. He had Ann Widdecombe on the other day.Looks so unbearable.
'Woke watch', 'uncancelled'. It's like the exact type of cringey right-wing nonsense you would come to expect from old and out of touch media heads with zero creativity.
And Farage just endlessly banging on about the people getting into the UK on boats. I feel like its all he's talked about for months and instead of trying to freshen things up now he's on a new platform he's just harping on about the same old shite.
Dan Wootton seems braindead as well. Type of person who can regurgitate information but can't formulate any thoughts of his own.
I am surprised at how badly its doing ratings wise though. I thought / feared that a huge proportion of the UK would lap it up.
I prefer the originalAnd Farage has a 'bit' on his show called Talking Pints where he has a pint with a guest and talks about crap. He had Ann Widdecombe on the other day.
So they're holding seances on there now.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Her dad is alive.How have I only just noticed Kirsty Gallacher is on there?
Seems she’s had it rough over the last few years - losing her dad, drink driving, Lawrence Fox but even still, GB News?
Wow.
Makes it even strangerHer dad is alive.
He is very hard to find sometimes, though.Her dad is alive.
How disappointing. I didn’t realise he had gone to Gammon Broadcasting Network. I used to dislike him cause he often came across as smug in the thumbnails for his docs, then I watched one for lack of anything else to watch and thought he was alright. Back to square one I guess
What a nonce
Wow they thought Fox comes across well there?!
You should listen to the full segment. Just offers no argument and when he does try to make a point Harwood shows him up for the clueless twat he is.Wow they thought Fox comes across well there?!
Erm…. No. What you’re seeing is the Right start constant culture wars to pretend all the things you listed are important to ‘The Left’. You have fallen for it.Goes without saying really. That's pretty much what I consider to be left wing. Pronouns, offensive jokes, people's life choices on what to do with their genitals, whatever else, not important. Who cares. Don't give a shit. It's the middle and upper class attempting to take ownership of the left wing, and repurposing it for their own trivial pet projects.
All right. But on my way, I'm going to be doing this...Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
You’re such a Harwood fanboiYou should listen to the full segment. Just offers no argument and when he does try to make a point Harwood shows him up for the clueless twat he is.
The guys a tit but he did at least challenge Fox on his bullshit views.You’re such a Harwood fanboi
How have I only just noticed Kirsty Gallacher is on there?
Seems she’s had it rough over the last few years - losing her dad, drink driving, Lawrence Fox but even still, GB News?
Wow.
Her dad is alive.
Makes it even stranger
He is very hard to find sometimes, though.
You say the left is misrepresented as a monolithic entity, whilst also you misrepresent the right as a monolithic entity...It takes two to tango, portraying it as one side being the baddies behind it all and the other side as the goodies reluctantly but nobly dragged in to save humanity is naive at best, and only further polemicizes the ever increasingly polemic culture war.Erm…. No. What you’re seeing is the Right start constant culture wars to pretend all the things you listed are important to ‘The Left’. You have fallen for it.
The right talks RELENTLESSLY about shared bathrooms, straws, religion, jokes, genitals. It’s exhausting. The left is then forced to defend human beings across the board. This misrepresentation of the left being a monolithic entity, often shining a bright light on university students as being a great ‘example’…. If you find yourself believing that you’re just plain stupid.
What’s wrong with the world is that an invented war is bought into by so many.
You say the left is misrepresented as a monolithic entity, whilst also you misrepresent the right as a monolithic entity...It takes two to tango, portraying it as one side being the baddies behind it all and the other side as the goodies reluctantly but nobly dragged in to save humanity is naive at best, and only further polemicizes the ever increasingly polemic culture war.
Both the left and the right are guilty, or the knobheads within the left and right to be more precise. Both feed off each other, which is why I advocate for ignoring the more outlandish elements of the right, rather than feeding it. I suppose I should follow my own advice and ignore the more outlandish elements of the left, too, but that is something I find more difficult to do. Not quite sure why. Perhaps it's because I am in regular contact with people who to various extents are caught up in the culture war from on the side of the left that it irks me, perhaps its a few real life events that has made a lasting impression, perhaps its because I'd rather focus my energies on correcting those who are ultimately closer to my own view point but have gone off track, than try to correct people whose values and beliefs are so opposite to mine that I'd never hope to be able to find middle ground with them, perhaps it's because I'm naturally contrarian and the loony left are prominent and mainstream than the loony right, at least in the circles that I keep, perhaps it's because I fear the loony left taking the focus away from real issues. Or maybe I should just stop reading the Guardian so often and I'll be instantly calmer.
I've realised you can take the most neutral, middle of the road, placatory stance on here and numerous sensitive upstarts will roar with outrage regardless.Do you expect anyone to take you seriously when you use the term “loony left”. It’s pure boomer Facebook lexicon. Embarrassing.
So much angerI've realised you can take the most neutral, middle of the road, placatory stance on here and numerous sensitive upstarts will roar with outrage regardless.
Your response is a fine example. I used the phrase loony left and loony right in equal measure* and you've had a little strop about the use of the phrase loony left. It's a fine example of the passive aggressive, partisan, snide, sniping, whinging, finger pointing twattery that is a significant contribution to the problem. Embarrassed? You fecking should be.
* Was it equal measure? I'm not sure. I bet some sad sausage will go back and count though. You said loony left 5 times, but you only said loony right 4 times, you fascist!!
Uses snide passive aggressive term and then accuses people of being snide and passive aggressive. The hypocrisy is unreal.I've realised you can take the most neutral, middle of the road, placatory stance on here and numerous sensitive upstarts will roar with outrage regardless.
Your response is a fine example. I used the phrase loony left and loony right in equal measure* and you've had a little strop about the use of the phrase loony left. It's a fine example of the passive aggressive, partisan, snide, sniping, whinging, finger pointing twattery that is a significant contribution to the problem. Embarrassed? You fecking should be.
* Was it equal measure? I'm not sure. I bet some sad sausage will go back and count though. You said loony left 5 times, but you only said loony right 4 times, you fascist!!
Should there be porn for children?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I have no idea what the backstory to that is, but I'm willing to bet it's about mild calls for better and/or earlier sex-education, or like someone made a book for kids that explains the body or sexual urges/boundaries or whatever, and his way of framing it is "should there be porn for children"?Should there be porn for children?
saw this in the replies, mental
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Backstory is this:I have no idea what the backstory to that is, but I'm willing to bet it's about mild calls for better and/or earlier sex-education, or like someone made a book for kids that explains the body or sexual urges/boundaries or whatever, and his way of framing it is "should there be porn for children"?