Adisa
likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Everybody is staying where they are.
That wasn't what it was at all - you already have to pay for your social care if your assets are above £23,250.The "dementia" tax was privatisation by stealth, that's how it will continue. Absolutley no doubt about it.
Poor tories.That wasn't what it was at all - you already have to pay for your social care if your assets are above £23,250.
May must be kicking herself that there wasn't multiple opportunities for her to speak directly to people and explain the policy better. If only!Poor tories.
Still, nice for the media to go ape-shit in the other direction for a change
If only she had a chance to significantly change the policy and "own" the changes as her listening to the peopleMay must be kicking herself that there wasn't multiple opportunities for her to speak directly to people and explain the policy better. If only!
I'm really hoping that is the policy Corbyn focuses on when PMQs comes around again. Particularly given it seems to be business as usual with Hunt staying onTheresa May and the "Naylor report! What you need to know!
I've been trying to make this joke for the last hour but couldn't quite get the wording right.That was the worst re-shuffle since i got drunk and threw an unopened deck of cards out the window.
Interesting. But did he not know when the tories came to power or is that a joke?Theresa May and the "Naylor report! What you need to know!
i retyped that about 6 times and it was still shit.I've been trying to make this joke for the last hour but couldn't quite get the wording right.
yes, closest I got to was that she shuffles like somehow who didn't take the deck out of the box, it's so bad.i retyped that about 6 times and it was still shit.
I'm a bit torn on the naylor report. The King's fund (who I generally trust) seem quite positive about it. But I've got a few friends in nhs finance who are aghast at it. I work in general management in the NHS and there are buildings that that just wouldn't be worth the investment or time to get back upto scratch. Seems sensible to sell them offmTheresa May and the "Naylor report! What you need to know!
It's the worst shuffle since my paraplegic uncle tried the charlestonyes, closest I got to was that she shuffles like somehow who didn't take the deck out of the box, it's so bad.
That video was posted a while back.Interesting. But did he not know when the tories came to power or is that a joke?
A lot of previously impregnable looking majorities have been whittled down a lot, too. Though they still topped 40% which is a lot in a genuine 3.5 party election.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Scotland was certainly close.
Osborne: Boris in a permanent leadership campaign!
Who is the .5A lot of previously impregnable looking majorities have been whittled down a lot, too. Though they still topped 40% which is a lot in a genuine 3.5 party election.
And in Lanark & Hamilton East, the three parties had over 30% of the vote each (0.7% between them).Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Scotland was certainly close.
There were a ton of close battles across the country. My constituency had a few hundred votes in it and didn't even make the top five. Although interestingly as a result, it does feel like votes really matter up here at the moment.And in Lanark & Hamilton East, the three parties had over 30% of the vote each (0.7% between them).
I agree but who replaces her? Rudd nearly lost her seat so it's hard to see how she can have the authority to lead the party and the country. Alistair Campbell made the point of Boris being an act which people see through now, and that the '£350m a week for the NHS' slogan will stick with him. Other than those two who is there? Gove, Hammond, Fallon aren't liked enough I don't think. Possibly David Davis?I'm certain that May will resign. I find it hard to believe that she would have the nerve to walk back into westminster after a catastrophic friendly fire raid on her own back bench.
She'll also be a laughing stock with the EU crowd and foreign leaders.
The Conservative government have to surely try to emerge from this situation with as much credibility as they can muster, which would be impossible with May still as prime minister.
Libs! Alas 7.8% of the vote when three others top 25% means they have to be a rung down, though they were efficient in seat terms.Who is the .5
He was in great form. Needs to watch stepping over into smug territory though.
very good interview.
A swing of around 4% or so from SNP to Tories and they'd have won up here.Libs! Alas 7% of the vote when three others top 25% means they have to be a rung down, though they were efficient in seat terms.
Also just saw that the SNP didn't top 40% after all, only 36.9%.
Labour as well, only just behind Tories on 27 in the end!A swing of around 4% or so from SNP to Tories and they'd have won up here.
Fantastic appointment - Gove's extensive period of time spent as a lizard means he has a great understanding of environmental issues.Labour as well, only just behind Tories on 27 in the end!
Gove's been made environment secretary.
I'm absolutely convinced they're trying to lose the government so inevitable Brexit failure isn't pinned to the Tories for 20 years.Cnut as Health Sec again the absolute fecking state of the Tories
She still hasn't passed the Queens speech. If your theory is right Corbyn could be pm at the end of the month.I'm absolutely convinced they're trying to lose the government so inevitable Brexit failure isn't pinned to the Tories for 20 years.
They couldn't have tried any harder to lose it during the campaign and somehow still failed (thanks only to the Press who wanted to keep them on).
Now she makes no changes and jumps into bed with the terrorists. Setting up for a loss in the next election she calls in a couple of months.
I'll never get tired of that
Always appropriate in times like this.
It really was the worst policy sell of all time. The thing is they started saying difficult choices had to be made and thats why they'd done it then after that stuck they decided to say oh no actually its better than now.That wasn't what it was at all - you already have to pay for your social care if your assets are above £23,250.
Yes.
Always appropriate in times like this.
The old system, the £23k doesnt include someone's house until you are are in a care home.It really was the worst policy sell of all time. The thing is they started saying difficult choices had to be made and thats why they'd done it then after that stuck they decided to say oh no actually its better than now.
What i never saw discussed is the cost implication