Highfather_24
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2014
- Messages
- 2,727
Without adds, Hojlund's fee is 22M less than Kane's(86-64).The difference between both fees excluding bonuses is £24m.
So yes, Kane cost around 20M more than Hojlund. Not counting wages, because I dont think United would have any problems giving a big final contract to a world class player(Casemiro, Varane).
Kane is a proven 25-30 goals a season player. We dont know if Hojlund will ever be that, but what I like about him is his fits Ten Hag's profile better(great at pressing), and I'm sick of us buying older players while other clubs sort out their future. I'm just not sure if we are picking the right players.