Sandikan
aka sex on the beach
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2011
- Messages
- 53,628
Good point.Who's going to take the penalties when he comes?
Take his pens away and he's down to single figures
Good point.Who's going to take the penalties when he comes?
No chance he cruises into Man Utd and gazumps our best player who barely ever misses!I imagine he'll have it in his contract that he's taking them!
SAF would be ruthless, sell Martial and sign Harry Kane.Just think what would SAF do?
The guy who has scored more than 15 league goals once in 6 years and 10 or less 4 times while contributing little else to the team play?Yes he's going to City if he moves
1) Levy doesn't Deal with Chelsea
2) United don't need a Striker when there's Greenwood , Martial and Cavani
unless it contained a clause to allow him to leave?And they can afford him.
Didn't he sign a new contract last summer? Bit stupid
Sir Alex would place his trust in Greenwood imoSAF would be ruthless, sell Martial and sign Harry Kane.
Rub that right inThe guy who has scored more than 15 league goals once in 6 years and 10 or less 4 times while contributing little else to the team play?
Not really, he got rid of Ruud. Trying to get rid of Rooney, sold Berbatov and signed RVP.Sir Alex would place his trust in Greenwood imo
I would rank Chelsea a little closer than that, young up and coming squad vg manager, ambitious owner who’s not afraid to spend. Would be a good fit for Kane as lead player.Yeah in terms of likelihood, I'd rank them:
1. City
2. United
3. Chelsea
But even if you take my bias for Chelsea out of it, and it was just between City and United. To me, I'd view any titles he's won with United differently, slightly more respected (totally the wrong word for it, but I'm struggling to formulate the feeling properly) than him just joining an already established title winning machine and winning more.
Doubt Levy would agree to that thoughunless it contained a clause to allow him to leave?
He got rid of players so youth could flourish. I cant think of instances when he blocked a wonderkids development by making big name signings.Not really, he got rid of Ruud. Trying to get rid of Rooney, sold Berbatov and signed RVP.
The man knows when a striker needs to go.
Fergie didn't like the agent fee related to signing Hazard, but we were still in for him. His obsession with agent fees were only related to certain people, he was happy to fill the pockets of a certain portugese agent..He got rid of players so youth could flourish. I cant think of instances when he blocked a wonderkids development by making big name signings.
He turned down Hazard, Aguero and Silva when we were in for them and it became an auction. Hell he said he would never do business with Spurs again!
Maybe RVP signature is the only time he signed an established striker to beat City to the title...He got rid of players so youth could flourish. I cant think of instances when he blocked a wonderkids development by making big name signings.
He turned down Hazard, Aguero and Silva when we were in for them and it became an auction. Hell he said he would never do business with Spurs again!
why would kane have signed a new deal without it... so remains to be seenDoubt Levy would agree to that though
i completely agree. I get the impression that Haaland would be a similar price, and would much prefer the younger guy if possible - admittedly doesn’t always work out like that.Am I the only who is slightly sceptical about the thought of signing Kane?
Will be 28 by the time next season starts, famously injury prone.. I mean how long longer will his ankles hold out and will undoubtedly cost at least £150m.
I personally would rather spend the funds on positions that quality is desperately needed, i.e RW, CM & CB.
"Go hard or go home"Just think what would SAF do?
grow up. It was one example, and clearly I know a lot more about our transfers than another club. Hence the example.There is now way you just compared United to Spurs? United signed them on the premise that they will take United back to the top... Spurs have never been a big club to go back to the top.
They had a good few years under Poch and are back where they normally are now.
United have the ability to offer huge wages, don't think Spurs have that ability too.
Of course you don’t. Furthermore they can play together, and there’s more than enough games to go around. If Cavani doesn’t like it, he knows what he can do. Thankfully he doesn’t have such a fragile mentality like many of our fans do.I've seen a few people say similar, and I don't get it.
Cavani is 34, and a superb cover, bearing in mind we don't really have a "proper" centre forward.
If a top class one becomes available, you don't say, nahhh, we've got a veteran signed on for a year!
Yeh and none of those players are comparable to Greenwood right now. Ruud had upset the squad, Rooney was getting past it, Berbatov was never really a fit.Not really, he got rid of Ruud. Trying to get rid of Rooney, sold Berbatov and signed RVP.
The man knows when a striker needs to go.
Greenwood had played 100 games for United - he’s developing just fine. If he’s the player we hope he becomes, then competition is no problem.Yeh and none of those players are comparable to Greenwood right now. Ruud had upset the squad, Rooney was getting past it, Berbatov was never really a fit.
Greenwood is one of the best young talents in the world.
Levy wouldn't sell Chelsea a virus. It's a nonstarter imo.I would rank Chelsea a little closer than that, young up and coming squad vg manager, ambitious owner who’s not afraid to spend. Would be a good fit for Kane as lead player.
Of course the fly in the ointment is Levy so yeah probably not going to happen....