Harry Maguire image 5

Harry Maguire England flag

2019-20 Performances


View full 2019-20 profile

6.1 Season Average Rating
Appearances
46
Clean sheets
20
Goals
3
Assists
1
Yellow cards
5

AFC NimbleThumb

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
1,790
United face kick & rush attacks outside of the Top6 & he lacks ability/pace.

My issue with signing him is that given the composition of the league & the way we are attacked his major weakness will always be targeted.

Wesley turned him inside out around the 7 min mark yesterday [he gave away a free kock] & it happens game in, game out - sometimes it’ll cost a goal, others it won’t but if you’re a team looking to snatch a win you get your athletic striker to stick to his side.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
19,625
I don't think he's average for England or when he was at Leicester. He's not an £80m player but until we get a manager that can actually set a team up right I'm not going to judge him too harshly.
Have you watched England since they moved to a back 4. He has not been very good at all
 

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
10,611
@el3mel said it(I think) and he was 1000% right on him.

You don't pay a WORLD RECORD FEE for a CB for purely an 'upgrade' on your center back options.

You pay that because you think that CB is transcendent and will change your team's fortunes going forward.

He needs to step it up and ASAP.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
74,612
Location
india
He's usually pretty solid, just not an £80 million CB. Better than average
Yeah I didn't see an 80 million defender when we were linked with him under Mourinho and I still don't see it. He's good but there are many good CBs out there. Maybe we'll see more under a better manager
 

iKnowNothing

Full Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
1,931
Location
hangin in there
Leicester have conceded 9 goals to our 17 so far. Goes to show that a proper system is more important than the individual/personnel.

Edit:
His price tag means that the media will soon start talking about him as the biggest flop this season with Pepe from Arsenal a close second.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
37,291
Location
W.Yorks
Have you watched England since they moved to a back 4. He has not been very good at all
Agreed - I have never been impressed with him in an England shirt - why i was very weary of signing him in the first place.

He has been better then that for us though at least - apart from recently when he's been annoyingly crap.
 

Kerry Donaghy

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 12, 2015
Messages
511
Location
Bessbrook
Supports
Celtic
we paid a top fee for an average/good defender, theres a reason why no top club outside the premier league was interested in him. I still dont get why is it a good thing to clearly overpay for a player for the simple fact that he is british?

I mean spanish teams dont overpay for spanish players, nor german teams gor german players, it may be due to marketing or something I guess.
Ive been saying this since the moment we made a statement about buying British last summer, I feared this would happen.

It made sense when I first started watching football about 30 years ago to pay a bit extra for British players because you could only play 4 (may have been 3 or even 5) foreign players in European games.
I vaguely remember we had to drop Peter Schmeichel for Gary Walsh against Barcelona because we had to choose between him, Roy Keane, Dennis Irwin and Andre Kanchelskis as our foreign players.

As I said though, since that rule was scrapped about 25 years ago, a players nationality realistically should have no influence at all on their transfer value, so this insistence on paying a premium for English or British players is farcical.

To be fair, most other clubs hade have realised this, it's just that nobody on our clueless recruitment team got the memo.
 

Fosu-Mens

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
3,739
Location
Fred | 2019/20 Performances
If we're doing hindsight, then it was Soyuncu but I dont think anyone saw him performing like he has this season... Except maybe Leicester
Not so much hindsight regarding Maguire as a transfer and I stated that we would be better served buying Evans during the summer.
Maguires lack of mobility made him imo a big problem regardless of his other abilities. There is slow and then there is Maguire.
 

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
25,009
Think we always knew he would struggle with pace. If we want to play with a high line he's going to get caught out eventually, that's just the way it is.

Having a rapid centre back next to him like Tuanzebe, Bailly or (muppet mode) Koulibaly would be brilliant.

Anyway, he's not been as bad as people are making out, but expecting him to do everything by himself was unrealistic.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
15,121
Anyway, he's not been as bad as people are making out...
Clearly not.

It's a predictable reaction from a number of posters on here who have been waiting for a chance to get the knives out. Nothing more, nothing less. He's a good player with certain weaknesses - who, crucially, cost a fortune.
 

ash_86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
5,722
Least of our problems. He's been quite dominant in the air and hasn't made much mistakes (i count 1 against Chelsea league cup). Midfield is the one we should be worrying about. Fix that and defense with can uphold their end of the bargain.
 

Chesterlestreet

Man of the crowd
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
15,121
Decent player with one weakness making him less productive in all other areas of his game.
Heh, then you're being surprisingly kind.

But, yeah - he's slow. I said so myself before he was announced. He clearly is slow where it matters - on the turn, over the first yards, etc.

I would not, however, say that this makes him less productive in all other areas of his game. A player's lack of sheer rapidity can be balanced out - both by himself and, not least, by the system in which he's employed. This has always been the case, and football has not evolved to the point where a good-to-great CB absolutely has to be rapid.

Our defence, on the whole, actually has improved in terms of clear-cut chances produced against us - compared to last season, and the season before that. To put this down to coincidence - nothing to do with Maguire providing something to make it more stable on the whole, or AWB (a fullback who can actually snuff out danger) - seems unreasonable.

Disregarding more intangible factors (the cohesiveness on the whole), Maguire has added aerial qualities (undoubtedly), physical qualities and - yes - passing qualities (he pushes up with the ball in order to release it adequately to a degree not matched by anyone we had before he arrived).

Oh, and - yeah - you can't judge what I labeled "overall cohesiveness" without factoring in what goes on in front of the defenders. For the last run of matches, we've essentially fielded a positively shite central midfield. Before that, the numbers were alright.
 

Fosu-Mens

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
3,739
Location
Fred | 2019/20 Performances
Heh, then you're being surprisingly kind.

But, yeah - he's slow. I said so myself before he was announced. He clearly is slow where it matters - on the turn, over the first yards, etc.

I would not, however, say that this makes him less productive in all other areas of his game. A player's lack of sheer rapidity can be balanced out - both by himself and, not least, by the system in which he's employed. This has always been the case, and football has not evolved to the point where a good-to-great CB absolutely has to be rapid.

Our defence, on the whole, actually has improved in terms of clear-cut chances produced against us - compared to last season, and the season before that. To put this down to coincidence - nothing to do with Maguire providing something to make it more stable on the whole, or AWB (a fullback who can actually snuff out danger) - seems unreasonable.

Disregarding more intangible factors (the cohesiveness on the whole), Maguire has added aerial qualities (undoubtedly), physical qualities and - yes - passing qualities (he pushes up with the ball in order to release it adequately to a degree not matched by anyone we had before he arrived).

Oh, and - yeah - you can't judge what I labeled "overall cohesiveness" without factoring in what goes on in front of the defenders. For the last run of matches, we've essentially fielded a positively shite central midfield. Before that, the numbers were alright.
One can have a weakness in one's game without it impacting other areas of the game. But when the magnitude of that weakness aka how extremely immobile Maguire is, it will impact other areas of the game. Look at our offensive set pieces, we have played floaterscorners a number of times this year just to give Maguire time to position himself. We as a team are extremely afraid of counters partly due to Maguire's lack of mobility. His inability to turn on the spot with the ball, or decide passing direction fast when trying to play out of defence is not good enough due to his lack of mobility.

Having players with weaknesses in their game is not something that can be avoided, but when this can impact how the rest of the team is set up or approach football, then something is obviously wrong. Cohesiveness/holistic view of a football squad is important when evaluating a players ability, but when a player is unable to hold his own individually first, then it is difficult to argue any cohesive positive outcome.

tl;dr If a players weakness in one area of the game is so big that it needs special accommodation from tactical setup to how the team play it is not a good start.

Personally i think Maguire's reading of the game, decisionmaking etc are all very good (despite these being intangiable abilities) and are a reason he has been able to perform.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
46,019
Location
Hope, We Lose
Not so much hindsight regarding Maguire as a transfer and I stated that we would be better served buying Evans during the summer.
Maguires lack of mobility made him imo a big problem regardless of his other abilities. There is slow and then there is Maguire.
Evans is pretty slow himself
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
10,511
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
I don't dislike him but is he enough better than Smalling to justify an 80 million outlay when we so sorely needed better midfielders and attackers? Absolutely no chance. He's a minor upgrade at best, and you don't spend 80 million on a minor upgrade.
He shouldn't have been a Smalling replacement. He should've been a Smalling partner, and that then should have been a fairly good upgrade. Unless Tuanzebe is able to step up (so far this season he hasn't actually been very good when he's played), Maguire-Smalling is the best combo we have to cover everything we need and also cover each others weaknesses. It was obvious to anyone who had watched him a fair bit that Maguire-Lindelof likely wasn't going to work out as they are too similar and have most of the same weaknesses, and none of our other options are good enough or fit enough.

Rio and Vidic weren't some speed monsters but they both had some, enough to recover from mistakes or bad positioning.
Rio was one of the faster centrebacks around until his injuries slowed him down.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
24,606
Not sure if this has been mentioned but Google 'Manchester United,' select players and take a look at Maguire.
 

red woppit

Full Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2017
Messages
973
Location
Buchebi
Supports
Northampton Town
It helps Leicester that that have Ndidi, and a settled midfield. Maguire has been ok for me this season, made a few errors, but every player does that. Think his biggest mistake was missing the header against Newcastle. Needs a more powerful CB alongside him I believe, with a bit of pace. Would like to see Tuanzebe given a good run there.
 

Fosu-Mens

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Messages
3,739
Location
Fred | 2019/20 Performances
Evans is far quicker on the turn than Maguire is whenever I watch him. Maguire turns like an oil tanker.
And this is why I don't think Maguire is the right person to build the team around (and why buying him will turn out to be a big mistake in the long run).
Having central defenders that are capable of holding their own 1v1 against fast and agile attackers would make it possible for the team to play a high line/press with the whole team and not be so constricted by having to compress to mitigate for immobile central defenders.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
24,606
Having a system and an adequate midfield in place will sort a lot of it out. We still expose our defense far too often for my liking. We give teams too much space and time. You put practically any centre back into our team and they will struggle.
 

A-man

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2017
Messages
2,120
It helps Leicester that that have Ndidi, and a settled midfield. Maguire has been ok for me this season, made a few errors, but every player does that. Think his biggest mistake was missing the header against Newcastle. Needs a more powerful CB alongside him I believe, with a bit of pace. Would like to see Tuanzebe given a good run there.
Is Tuanzebe fast? I’ve seen him play a few times but never seen him use any extraordinary speed.
 

Isotope

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
14,850
Supports
Ole Ole Ole
Having a system and an adequate midfield in place will sort a lot of it out. We still expose our defense far too often for my liking. We give teams too much space and time. You put practically any centre back into our team and they will struggle.
Are you saying that spending 80m on a new CB doesn't make any difference?
 

Isotope

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
14,850
Supports
Ole Ole Ole
No. Are you implying spending £80mil on a new CB will solve all our problems.
Solve all problems? I'm not sure how you come to that deduction from my question there. But I'm sure that having good centerbacks there would make our team much better defensively.
 
Last edited:
Man Utd 2:1 Spurs

UNITED ACADEMY

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
3,635
No. Are you implying spending £80mil on a new CB will solve all our problems.
You are making yourself look like a fool with that post mate. Clearly you didn’t get the message that Ole has mentioned last season, we need more than one window and by means whoever we decide to sign last summer won’t solve all our problem.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
24,606
You are making yourself look like a fool with that post mate. Clearly you didn’t get the message that Ole has mentioned last season, we need more than one window and by means whoever we decide to sign last summer won’t solve all our problem.
:lol: That’s literally the point I’m making. Who’s the fool?
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
24,606
Solve all problems? I'm not sure how you come to that deduction from my question there. But I'm sure that having good centerbacks there would make our team much better defensively.
I’ve used the same logic you’ve used with me. It’s a bit silly really isn’t it?
 

roonster09

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
23,119
There was one moment when De Gea took goal kick and passed the ball to Maguire in the box, he carried the ball good 20-25 yards and then passed the ball to midfielder, that's his strength on the ball, shame he isn't doing it a lot. Very good dribbler.

I thought he had good game today.
 

WR10

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
4,941
Location
Dream
There was one moment when De Gea took GK and passed the ball to Maguire in the box, he carried the ball good 20-25 yards and then passed the ball to midfielder, that's his strength on the ball, shame he isn't doing it a lot. Very good dribbler.

I thought he had good game today.
Absolutely. He did it on 3 occasions in the game. He spread play to one of the wings setting up a solid attacking transition breaking a press.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
12,331
Thought that was his best game in a United shirt tonight, he and Lindelof were imperious.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
3,635
:lol: That’s literally the point I’m making. Who’s the fool?
What point? A point with no sense of it isn’t a point. Why are you making a fool of yourself acting like you made some point.

We need both centre back & midfield equally. We tried to solve our midfield in the past 3 seasons & had Herrera in midfield last season and look at what happened? We were still outside top 5 and still shite. That’s the reality mate, it won’t sort a lot of it out.
 

arthurka

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
12,079
Location
Rectum
Doesn't inspire me with any confidence what so ever. His passing was off tonight. He left McT and Young for dead with his passing from defense on couple of occasions.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
5,175
He's a good player but he's made no difference to our defending or attacking. For 80m you'd expect him to shore up the team like Van Dijk did. We still look suspect at the back and doesn't score enough for us as he should.
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
24,606
What point? A point with no sense of it isn’t a point. Why are you making a fool of yourself acting like you made some point.

We need both centre back & midfield equally. We tried to solve our midfield in the past 3 seasons & had Herrera in midfield last season and look at what happened? We were still outside top 5 and still shite. That’s the reality mate, it won’t sort a lot of it out.
Seriously, have a word with yourself. Take 30 seconds out of your day and actually read what’s been written. I’ve literally told you whatever ridiculous view you think I hold is not in fact true. And instead of actually accepting that, you’ve doubled down and called me a fool again. Talk about irony. :lol: