noodlehair
"It's like..."
I don't understand this thread
ExactlyThe whole idea of the thread is a bit ridiculous, the difference between Portugal and Argentina is that we won the final. Yet Ronaldo didn't play that final. How is that supposed to settle any debate?
I don't think it would be settled any way even if Ronaldo had been MoTM today, for a multitude of reasons. Yet, even for the ones who think these NT decisive moments should make all the difference (a fair view, even if I disagree), how can this be an argument?
A captain's job is to lead. Lead their team to victory. He damn well look like he was leading the entire competition to me.The whole idea of the thread is a bit ridiculous, the difference between Portugal and Argentina is that we won the final. Yet Ronaldo didn't play that final. How is that supposed to settle any debate?
I don't think it would be settled any way even if Ronaldo had been MoTM today, for a multitude of reasons. Yet, even for the ones who think these NT decisive moments should make all the difference (a fair view, even if I disagree), how can this be an argument?
Well, it's true that his captaincy should be merited in this tournament, but captaincy hasn't really ever factored much into GOAT discussions, has it? Ronaldo hasn't even been a captain for his clubs (even Pepe is ahead of him at Real Madrid in that regard), and it's his club form that brought him into GOAT discussions.A captain's job is to lead. Lead their team to victory. He damn well look like he was leading the entire competition to me.
So, now the conversation about the GOAT has to be about the years that fit a concrete criteria, not all? Should rename the term to Greatest of the Years I See Fit, aka GYISFFact is Ronaldo has outscored Messi consistently for quite a few years now.
http://messivsronaldo.net/
He scored 4 goals, assisted another, and gave the last touch before the goal in 2 more, Messi was the key player behind 7 or Argentina's 8 goals, he dribbled more than any other player (46, Robben did 29 dribbles, Maradona 50 in Mexico 86') and created more chances than any other player in the tournament in a team where Romero, Rojo, Demichelis, Biglia, Enzo Perez and Gago were regular starters. Argentina was a piss poor team that worked because Messi, Di Maria and Mascherano held it together, once Di Maria couldn't play they became an abomination with Messi having to run the show all by himselfBut his pointless tap dancing did not deliver success at the highest level.
Messi FAILED for Argentina with a much better team than Ronaldo has has in Euro's 2016
Perhaps Messi is even better than Ronaldo because Ronaldo merely led Portugal to victory whilst not playing, while Messi led them to victory whilst not even being Portugese. A much more impressive fete.
To be fair, Maradona did provide the crucial assist to the winning goal in the final though, while scoring 5 goals with 5 assists in the tournament. Ronaldo is only part of team to win the Euro, while scoring 3 goals and 3 assists in the tournament. You can say Ronaldo is one of Portugal success factor and did his fair bit of contribution, but Maradona was the absolute star of the tournament.I don't think I brought Maradona's 86 world cup in the argument, someone else did.
But, Maradona did not do anything in the Final and depended on his teammates to win the trophy for him. That's a FACHT
He took them to final by playing brilliantly in the semi-final, just like Ronaldo took Portugal to the final![]()
So you think Messi couldn't win a different league if he stepped outside of the Liga BBVA?Ronaldo for me, and this latest trophy is an icing on cake.
Ronaldo has won in two leagues, 3 CL with two different teams and now has an international trophy.
Messi dominated Spain but he had two all time greats with him (Xavi and Iniesta). More recently he had Suarez and Neymar.
No doubt Barcelona is the better team, and Messi is better technically, but he's not proven he can win trophies without Barcelona.
Ronaldo has, with us, and now with Portugal.
He probably could but he hasn't done it has he?So you think Messi couldn't win a different league if he stepped outside of the Liga BBVA?
Are you Glenn Hoddle?
He hasn't done because he's too good a player for any club to ever hope to be able to afford him. It's not rocket science, mate.He probably could but he hasn't done it has he?
On paper he could win Liga BBVA every season too but has he?
Ronaldo has the EPL medal at home (or whatever he keeps it), it's not theoretical.
He could force a move if he wanted to prove himself in another league, run his contract down.He hasn't done because he's too good a player for any club to ever hope to be able to afford him. It's not rocket science, mate.
This is why is Marc Overmars is better than Ryan Giggs, who never proved himself outside of the Premier League.He could force a move if he wanted to prove himself in another league, run his contract down.
He hasn't, and that's fine (loyalty and all that) but that's why he is a great player in the best team in recent times, not someone that wins with every team he plays for.
Neither is in GOAT discussion.This is why is Marc Overmars is better than Ryan Giggs, who never proved himself outside of the Premier League.
This is an international tournament - no team has it easy. Arguing they've had to face Austria, Iceland and whoever you want to name is simply lazy IMO - it's not as if it's a given that Portugal would beat them, because they are not a really strong side themselves - they simply earned the victory through hard work. And they still had to overcome France who has managed to beat the likes of Germany directly and a few other top teams indirectly.This is the kind of debate I'd expect to hear in 20 years from people who never saw them play, with their opinions based entirely on stats. Ridiculous.
Ronaldo has been average at best this tournament. Portugal have also been average. Of course you need luck to win, but it's hard to deny they've had more than their fair share. I mean Iceland, Austria, Hungary, then Croatia, Poland and Wales! Has there ever been an easier run to a final? And still they've only won ONE game in normal time! I think if you really wanted to make the argument that Ronaldo was the better player you could do a lot better than point to this tournament!
Again that's lazy. Besides I thought we're talking about Messi and not Ronaldinho! Messi is as effective as any player could ever possibly be - but no, he can't do things no other player can dream of doing. That's in fact one of the very few ways you could actually overrate Messi.Messi is clearly the better player. He can do things no other player can dream of doing. Ronaldo may be the best professional of all time - I don't think a finer athlete has ever played - but he's nowhere near Messi for talent (and the application of that talent).
Future united manager?
Exactly. It's absurd.The whole idea of the thread is a bit ridiculous, the difference between Portugal and Argentina is that we won the final. Yet Ronaldo didn't play that final. How is that supposed to settle any debate?
I don't think it would be settled any way even if Ronaldo had been MoTM today, for a multitude of reasons. Yet, even for the ones who think these NT decisive moments should make all the difference (a fair view, even if I disagree), how can this be an argument?
It is the first time I can remember a player getting massive credit for an outcome of a match when that player was subbed off before making any impact. And he did sort of pull a John Terry. In 2012 in the second leg against Napoli. Terry was subbed off late and then after getting subbed off he stood on the touchline and barked orders and I remember people taking it as a joke.I don't understand why some are saying that Ronaldo didn't play in the final.
He started the match as Portugal captain.
Was seriously injured and returned to the pitch twice.
Came back at 90 minutes after receiving treatment to offer support and encourage his teamates.
Was in the technical area directing his team
Celebrated with all his team and country.
Circumstances outside of Ronaldo's control robbed him of playing a proper game but he kept coming back, showing leadership and the desire to win. That's what leadership is. It's not always about scoring the winning goal. It's about inspiring others around you. I understand Ronaldo's got a bizarre personality that rubs many people the wrong way but some of you are acting like he's pulled a John Terry.
Perhaps I am giving him too much credit for his participation in the final but others arguing the opposite are discounting him unfairly. There's a middle ground and he deserves some credit in helping get Portugal to the final.It is the first time I can remember a player getting massive credit for an outcome of a match when that player was subbed off before making any impact. And he did sort of pull a John Terry. In 2012 in the second leg against Napoli. Terry was subbed off late and then after getting subbed off he stood on the touchline and barked orders and I remember people taking it as a joke.
But, there is also middle ground to saying he played in the final and saying he is the best ever and lauding his leadership in a match he barely played in. And I am really not going to give this Portugal side much credit considering how mediocre they have been during this whole tournament. But, I am sort of a prick like that. I crap on Chelsea's CL win and Liverpool's last win every chance I get.Perhaps I am giving him too much credit for his participation in the final but others arguing the opposite are discounting him unfairly. There's a middle ground and he deserves some credit in helping get Portugal to the final.
I think you're doing a massive disservice to his teammates if you think Portugal would have lost the final without him cheering them on from the side. It's an utterly ludicrous claim. They wouldn't have won the tournament without his 2 goals v Hungary in the groups. They'd have been going home instead.This game showed that leadership matters.
Regardless of his form, Portugal does not win this tournament without Ronaldo leading from inside and outside of the field.
If Messi showed that type of leadership I believe Argentina would have won at least one of their recent finals. Rather than moping in frustration as he did in 2014 and 2015 and even after his penalty miss this year.
BrilliantBut, I am sort of a prick like that.
No it wouldn't have because there's other all time greats like Pele and Maradona who played in and won World Cup finals and were instrumental.If Ronaldo would have played this final and Portugal had won, it would have sealed the argument that as of July 2016, Ronaldo is the greatest ever.
Messi took an average Argentina to the WC final whilst Ronaldo wasn't even the best player on his team to lead his team past the mighty Croatia, Poland and Wales to play 20mins in the final.
Playing deeper = better?Ronaldo gravitates as an inverted forward always as he's got older, he's mostly the one linking at at the edge of the box whilst Messi is the one to come to the centre circle to start moves happening.
Here's a comparison of a heat-map in El Classico 12 months ago![]()
These are triggered when they touch the ball by the way, Ronaldo is less involved.
Here's another example, El Classico this year where Madrid actually won.
![]()
You can see where Messi touches the ball, he's a lot more central but Ronaldo inverted forward touches the ball in the box more and in much less dangerous areas creating less for his team. Messi is hugely influential.
You can't blame Ronaldo he's old now in footballing terms, Messi is a better passer and dribbler so he can come a little deeper, Ronaldos numbers are great but he's doing less for the team over the 90 minutes he's there to get the headlines and that's a reason why he hasn't won as much for Real because he doesn't influence as much.
Feel free to check out the Squawka heat maps though which don't lie, it's all provided through OPTA.
I think Ronaldo is great he's just not on the same level.