Swings and roundabouts innit. You can't complain about bad decisions then dismiss out of hand others as they don't suit you're agenda. It was a nailed on free kick in Wales favour. Denmark then went on and scored, making it 2-0 and thus benefitting from bad refereeing plus leaving Wales with an impossible task.
Who's to say that Wales wouldn't have scored had the foul not occured making it 1-1?
There's also no guarantee that the game would've gone to penalties, I dare say England would've scored again anyway, even at 2-1 they continued to push for more.
Thank god for clearing it all up on my biased mind. I thought an important decision while going 1-1 in a tired extra-time was way more decisive than a 1-0 lead against fecking Wales, but you've proven me all wrong.
Oh no, we might even would've had to play from 1-1 against Wales if we take your scenario? That at least makes for more outcomes than doomed at 2-1 with 10 men, and taking in that we won 4-0, maybe it'd still be okay and not feck us over against a Wales team we outclassed (check the stats)?
I can understand your frustration but you had several ref calls go in your favour in the 90 minutes. Including the free kick which you scored from & a clear penalty for England not given.
The penalty was very harsh I agree.
Several is probably correct on text, but with context
Swings and roundabouts innit. You can't complain about bad decisions then dismiss out of hand others as they don't suit you're agenda. It was a nailed on free kick in Wales favour. Denmark then went on and scored, making it 2-0 and thus benefitting from bad refereeing plus leaving Wales with an impossible task.
Who's to say that Wales wouldn't have scored had the foul not occured making it 1-1?
There's also no guarantee that the game would've gone to penalties, I dare say England would've scored again anyway, even at 2-1 they continued to push for more.
But if this "what about that other stuff that happened" reasoning is what we're going for, then we can drag it all back to qualifiers, heck we could even just call off Sterling's goal for being two balls at the pitch at the same time, because another similar two balls incident happened in extratime where play was stopped. These argument just suit ones own agenda and is like quoting the fittings passage of the bible suiting ones needs.
If you take an honest neutral view on the impact of tonight's decision it's so much bigger than a lead against Wales at 1-0. To step back and try to be neutral, even if you went by the bookies live odds/wisdom of the crowd, the Sterling incident is more unfair.
I get your point that some is given, some is not, but we're dealing with complete carelessness in the var room here and the transparency is really questionable. How can such big events not even be commented by officials? Players have to explain all sorts of shit after a match for medias - radiosilence from VAR and officals in a system that is supposed to correct wrongs - can't even spend 30 secs on what most non english users here sees as a great dive.