edgar i literally copy and pasted your own post back to you and now you say it is a broad description missing context.
Hunting endangered species
- Thread starter Pogue Mahone
- Start date
I forgive you.
Jesus Feckin Christ.
We agree that almost all hunting is entertainment.
What I'm saying and what you're missing is that there are contextual grading within the broad description. Some maybe acceptable and others not.
Just saying entertainment isn't sufficient.
for fecks sake dude
Yes, that was us agreeing almost all hunting is entertainment.
Do you read the post after or just pretend to be dumb?
Two feckin points I make and yet can't follow.
no it wasnt me agreeing. it was me copy and pasting your post. and then you still found a way to disagree with yourself.
Dude, 2 posts 2 points. We agreed on one you refuse to respond to other.
Can't reason with people who choose to be willfully blind.
Congrats on winning this argument. You also Silva give each other a pat on backs.
as far as I can discern nobody is actually disagreeing about anything here
The hunt, food, trophy hunt argument is pretty stupid.
I don’t need to hunt in order to eat. That said, I can fill my freezer with meat for a fraction of the cost of store bought meat.
Bring a deer or a wild hog to the processor and you can order just about any cut of meat - bacon, ground, sausage, breakfast sausage, flavored sausages, back strap, etc. The processing fee, plus any additional fees for specialty cuts is so much cheaper than buying at the store.
I don’t need to hunt in order to eat. That said, I can fill my freezer with meat for a fraction of the cost of store bought meat.
Bring a deer or a wild hog to the processor and you can order just about any cut of meat - bacon, ground, sausage, breakfast sausage, flavored sausages, back strap, etc. The processing fee, plus any additional fees for specialty cuts is so much cheaper than buying at the store.
You’re not wrong. They’re all right.
It's what I do
This thread is like a really antagonistic episode of the Rubin Report.
Would it be appropriate to shoot that blonde lady in the face if I eat her afterwards?
Oh and someone disagreeing with his own post is already one of the highlights of my existence.
Would it be appropriate to shoot that blonde lady in the face if I eat her afterwards?
Oh and someone disagreeing with his own post is already one of the highlights of my existence.
Last edited:
People hunting for food is different. I understand that. We’ve done it for thousands of years.
People blowing a Giraffe or Lions head off from 50 yards away is what I deem cnutish.
Like I said earlier, these people should try hunting a lion or a tiger without a gun. That I would have respect for.
I was being sarcastic mate. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
I fully understand people hunting for food or hunting dangerous bears etc near towns/villages. It’s cnuts that take pleasure in blowing animals heads off from 50 yards away For the sole purpose of gloating that they “hunted” a giraffe that I have issues with.
This is different. Hunting/killing a dangerous animal that is in close proximity to a town/village is not the same as trophy hunting.
Last edited:
Good man. That’s all I was wondering before the shit hit the fan.
Only if there is a Dept. of Natural Resources regulated blonde lady hunting season.
Do we really need a department to ascertain that there's an over abundance of humans on our planet?
Hunting for food as a means to survive and your only source of food or hunting and then eating your hobby kill meat?
Bit of a difference there too
The department already exists.
I’ve already given my thoughts on that.
I wasn't for a moment suggesting it was, your post just reminded me of that cool story. He wasn't hunting at all, he was defending himself from attack.
Thank goodness for the courage of that eegit on a pushbike who mauled a kitten and posted it on Instagram.
It's just bs that some use to justify their ego boost
2nd attempt at something actually good and pertinent to stopping poachers killing endangered species...
Prince William apparently is the mastermind behind this, as he came up with the Taskforces that caught the traffickers and convinced governments to form them.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wildli...southern-district-new-york-fish-and-wildlife/
U.S. law enforcement agencies have taken down a smuggling network accused of trafficking at least $7 million dollars worth of rhino horn and elephant tusk — as well as heroin — around the world. The bust is the first major success for a small group of people trying to shift the narrative on the illegal wildlife trade. These indictments are proof, they say, that the criminals who threaten the world's endangered species are also a direct threat to our safety as humans.
Prince William apparently is the mastermind behind this, as he came up with the Taskforces that caught the traffickers and convinced governments to form them.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wildli...southern-district-new-york-fish-and-wildlife/
U.S. law enforcement agencies have taken down a smuggling network accused of trafficking at least $7 million dollars worth of rhino horn and elephant tusk — as well as heroin — around the world. The bust is the first major success for a small group of people trying to shift the narrative on the illegal wildlife trade. These indictments are proof, they say, that the criminals who threaten the world's endangered species are also a direct threat to our safety as humans.
I suggest we start by culling the human population with the 25% highest carbon footprint.
Unless that includes me, in that case we better make it 24%. Wouldn't want my feigned morals to get in the way of my personal situation.
You’d need to present it to DNR.
Meh, too much red tape, I just wanna shoot some stuff. Much like hunters do under the guise of look at me I'm doing something altruistic by culling the animal population
I’d have to advise against poaching.Meh, too much red tape, I just wanna shoot some stuff. Much like hunters do under the guise of look at me I'm doing something altruistic by culling the animal population
That's actually not true. Overpopulation is a myth that was first false propagated by Thomas Malthus (who was subsequently proven wrong both in theory and in reality).
What the planet has is a resource distribution problem not a lack of resource problem. Technologically and biologically there are more than enough resources to support double the population we have (although clearly not organized in the inefficient manner they are now)
Really? Sounds logical actually. I suppose if we did away with all our luxuries we'dbe fine. We never will though.