In a manner of speaking. He was in the right place at the right time to rise to prominence - the balance to the galacticos at Real. He also sustained his level for longer than the aforementioned too, and for better clubs, so his profile is naturally higher.
The overall point is, his job was to win the ball, stay back while he others went forward and plugged the gaps. When on the ball, he's done well so long as he can move it on to a teammate. I'm not saying this is an insignificant job. I'm saying that over my time watching football, many teams have had this kind of player, and will continue to have them, and most will develop the same way as the aforementioned.
That a player who could be 22 and still playing for an obscure team, or be an unheralded member or a top squad, or potentially still be loaned out to other sides can still go on to be a key member of trophy winning elevens is not the usual route. It is not the least common route for a team's defensive midfielder though.
Makalele was obviously a top player, but that is largely in context. He was no Sergio Busquets of a defensive midfielder, pegged to be a great player from early on. He was no Redondo. He was no Vieira, nor is Kante. With the right luck, timing etc, such players can be of great value. Makalele performed a similar role at Chelsea. He was also somewhat of a pioneer in my opinion, in that - we did not use this kind of player much in the PL before he came, at least not top clubs. Teams played 442, but the introduction of foreign coaches and new formations saw him excel in 'the Makalele role'.
That Phil Neville can get to a stage where he picks himself for big games is not down to his undeniable talent. He could quite feasibly have started, and won a CL final in that role had we got there during this period. He'd still be 'only Phil Neville', and his job won't have been far different to whatever Makalele was heralded for.
Kanté left France at 25, under the radar, not touted as a £30m player. It is the context to his performance that propelled him to the status he is, as one of the 'best midfielders in the PL'. However, his contribution will be replicated time and again over the years by players wh o, like him, had little to no profile, before being dropped into the defensive midfield of the right team at the right time. 'Nicky Butt was England's best player at the tournament'. 'Owen Hargreaves was England's best player at the tournament'. It will continue to happen.