2 man midfield
Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
If Brentford go down he’ll be available for a cut price in the summer anyway. Anyone bidding 100m in January is silly.
No way Brentford are going down. He is a boyhood Arsenal fan.He will go Arsenal If he goes anywhereIf Brentford go down he’ll be available for a cut price in the summer anyway. Anyone bidding 100m in January is silly.
They’re on a huge slide, losing their last 5 and sitting 4 points above the drop zone - just above a resurgent Everton. Not saying it’ll happen, but stranger things have.No way Brentford are going down. He is a boyhood Arsenal fan.He will go Arsenal If he goes anywhere
Exactly. You can't just say hey, ignore Hojlund, this is how much Ivan is worth. You'll just get laughed out of the room.You can’t inflate the market and then complain about the prices stuck on players. Højlund at what we paid sets a precedent.
He’s scored a hat trick in the last week for Brentford B. I think he’ll be fine.He hasn't played football for a long time now. He will likely need months before he is properly match fit.
Who is worth the money then?No way near worth the money
Bit of a gamble, this one.
Mason and Toney will be a massive upgrade on what we're currently dealing with up front. At least we'd have 2 genuine attacking threats.I would prefer Mason to come back.
Again I disagree. Not sure why a Hojlund is suddenly the benchmark for all CFs. As I’ve said that’s not how the market works.You can’t inflate the market and then complain about the prices stuck on players. Højlund at what we paid sets a precedent.
There's no striker available worth that price tag. Better off scouting and finding the next hit striker than throwing a ton of money at Toney.Who is worth the money then?
Honestly, just because we overspent on players in the past doesn't mean we should keep doing it.Antony £86m
Hojlund £72m
£100m for Toney would be an absolute bargain in comparison.
We're seen as a mark because of the exorbitant fees we've spent on players. Paying what we did for Hojlund sets the market because clubs with superior, more proven players are going to look at their player and say if X costs <insert overpayment> then our player has to cost more, and as the market has already been set, it's a logical home run for clubs with such assets.Again I disagree. Not sure why a Hojlund is suddenly the benchmark for all CFs. As I’ve said that’s not how the market works.
Well yeah, he's basically Rickie Lambert.I don’t think we will go for him. He would have been a solid signing a few years ago. I always wanted him since I saw what he could do in the championship and the kind of player he could be. He’s better than what we have and he’s a at a good age. At very big money It does kind of feel slightly like a Liverpool when they were losing type of signing.
I think some more context is needed here.Spending big money on Toney would prove we've learned nowt. Any kind of analysis beyond "look at his goal numbers" shows that he wouldn't be worth close to the figures quoted.
- His stats are massively padded by penalties. Without them he's got 21 goals in 66 PL games, which is perfectly decent for a midtable club, but not close to "let's chuck £80m at them" good.
- He can't pass the ball. His overall pass completion in the PL is something like 58%. People already going nuts about Bruno and Rashford giving the ball away would lose their minds watching him every week. They're Xavi and Iniesta in comparison.
- Worst of all, he seems unprofessional. Aside from the gambling issue, he's been in the press several times slagging Brentford off for no reason. The absolute last thing we need is to spunk big money on another potentially unprofessional player after the Ronaldo and Sancho situations.
Posts like this only highlights how saying stats without context is rather meaningless.Spending big money on Toney would prove we've learned nowt. Any kind of analysis beyond "look at his goal numbers" shows that he wouldn't be worth close to the figures quoted.
- His stats are massively padded by penalties. Without them he's got 21 goals in 66 PL games, which is perfectly decent for a midtable club, but not close to "let's chuck £80m at them" good.
- He can't pass the ball. His overall pass completion in the PL is something like 58%. People already going nuts about Bruno and Rashford giving the ball away would lose their minds watching him every week. They're Xavi and Iniesta in comparison.
- Worst of all, he seems unprofessional. Aside from the gambling issue, he's been in the press several times slagging Brentford off for no reason. The absolute last thing we need is to spunk big money on another potentially unprofessional player after the Ronaldo and Sancho situations.
this. He's 27 (28 in March), hasn't been playing for months, his reputation had taken a hit with the gambling thing and he has just 1 good season in the EPL. Anything above the 40m mark would be sillyThe idea of paying big bucks for him is insane.
And if Brentford want to get rid of him for a much lower price then we should run a mile, as they wouldn't do that unless there was a good reason.
He's a Liverpool fanNo way Brentford are going down. He is a boyhood Arsenal fan.He will go Arsenal If he goes anywhere
Don’t agree with that reallyWe're seen as a mark because of the exorbitant fees we've spent on players. Paying what we did for Hojlund sets the market because clubs with superior, more proven players are going to look at their player and say if X costs <insert overpayment> then our player has to cost more, and as the market has already been set, it's a logical home run for clubs with such assets.
I didn't say anything about all CF's, just us and how what we've done impacts on us and the market at large. We can't re-enter a marketplace we've played a hand in distorting and complain about it.
City won treble with Villa-Leicester attack and Everton-Spurs-Bournemouth defence.I don’t think we will go for him.
He would have been a really solid signing a few years ago. I really wanted him since I saw what he could do in the championship and the kind of player he could be. He’s better than what we have and he’s at a very good age. At big money It does kind of feel slightly like a Liverpool when they were losing type of signing though. Is there nobody potentially much better for less out there? Anyone who can get us 15 plus goals in the league is more than welcome.
But say we got Olise and this lad? That’s a Crystal Palace - Brentford looking attack. Is that going to win us prizes? We need to buy goals and assists from somewhere.
So was Solskjær... and Gakpo was a United fan, right? Doesn't mean all that much.He's a Liverpool fan
Modric is Barca fan, Gvardiol is Liverpool fan, Sterling is Man Utd fan, Keane is Spurs fan......that all means absolutely nothing.He's a Liverpool fan
Yeah form not good. But there are some worse teams in the league . Frank is a good coach he will have enough to keep them up. Personally Cant see it. But agree that west Ham team in 01 I think it was went down and on paper a much better side than Brentford. So yes stranger things have happened. I like him as a player. But against signing him.They’re on a huge slide, losing their last 5 and sitting 4 points above the drop zone - just above a resurgent Everton. Not saying it’ll happen, but stranger things have.
Thats a shame poor guyHe's a Liverpool fan
The "Players you forgot existed" thread screams for this guyWell yeah, he's basically Rickie Lambert.
Yep, I wasn't disputing that part. Arsenal looks the likeliest destination if he does leave this window.So was Solskjær... and Gakpo was a United fan, right? Doesn't mean all that much.
Well yeah, he'd be a massive bellend if he just served his ban and then fecked off in Jan, especially with all their players at the AFCON.From his comments today it sounds like he will definitely stay at Brentford until the summer.
He will only have 12 months left on his contract at that point so Brentford will presumably want to cash in.
Who is that player that can compete with him and help to take the pressure off?Honestly, just because we overspent on players in the past doesn't mean we should keep doing it.
I think we need to make decision whether we should buying into Hojlund project by playing him and spending cheap on a striker who is capable to compete with Hojlund (may be someone like DCL who even though he is underperforming right now but has the potential to score 15 league goals proven in the past) or we should spending 100m on Toney and start him every game (well, that's the logic if you are willing to spend 100m on 27 years old) and make Hojlund as our backup and sit on the bench most of the time.
Suppose we better carry on not scoring goals then and keep Hojlund in a good head spaceHe would add pressure on Hojlund. The narrative would be we're binning him after 6 months.