Jesus, that is very very creepy.
You're probably a lot younger than me but when I was a kid he was always regarded as a creepy schlock merchant.It's hard to look beyond the eccentric, loveable uncle image that a lot of people, including myself, had of him for so long. But if these stories are true, when you look back it all makes perfect sense. All the pieces fit so easily
Pretty much. This isn't a new thing. When he died last year there was a whole thread discussing the various allegations around him, which was curtailed by the usual "why can't we have an RIP thread without anyone saying nasty things" business. This is also by no means the nastiest thing rumoured about him either. Though that's not to say fire begat smoke, etc.I think you'll find that some of 'these people' came forward many years ago. He was interviewd by detectives back in 2007 as that first article states.
That is a very interesting fact. Jesus, how was all this not in the public domain before now? Or was it and I just completely missed it?Some favour from Savile (having Glitter on his show) seeing as GG hadn't had a hit in the top 100 for six years at the time of broadcasting. Hmm.
Then why wouldn't they have come forward then?It was reported on the news last night that someone has come forward claiming that they saw Gary Glitter abusing someone in Jimmy Saviles dressing room, while Jimmy Savile was also abusing someone in there at the same time.
Sick in the extreme if true.
Yeah it is. If (and it's a big if) the allegations are true.All these people saying "I told you so!"
Don't people think it is a terrible shame that someone who did so much to raise money for sick children turns out to probably be a paedo?
Oh c'mon, David Icke, behave will you.Carlsen19 from the newbies sent me this link...
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/55533-death-of-a-showman-jimmy-saville-1926-2011
Sickening, if what's here is true.
Who knows. Thats a question for them to answer.Then why wouldn't they have come forward then?
http://m.guardian.co.uk/music/2012/...net-child-abuse-images?cat=music&type=articleI'm still waiting for Pete Townsend's book. It's bound to be a corker.
It was nice to see him represent the best of Britain at the Olympics.I'm still waiting for Pete Townsend's book. It's bound to be a corker.
Sounds legit.He said he intended to reveal the financial trail of child abuse from Russian orphanages to British banks by paying a £7 fee to access a child pornography site with his credit card, which he cancelled immediately
Hope you never get summoned for jury service.Jimmy always was very odd, definitely seemed like he had a dark side.
Well Bryan I base that on watching the Louis Theroux documentary. In it Jimmy talked about 'sorting people out' in his Glasgow nightclub. Anyone who owns a nightclub in Glasgow needs to have something about them. I also found it odd that he said that he 'hated children' because people accused him of being a pedo. Why? Because it was odd.Hope you never get summoned for jury service.
He will actually be a hebephile, defined as someone sexually interested in 11- 14 year old's. Pedophilia is a sexual interest in prepubescents.The trouble I'm having with all of this is that as far as I can tell he's had his way with 14 year-old girls. Currently the age of consent in several European countries is 14 and I think it may even be 13 in Spain.
While definitely creepy, I'm not sure it's of the level of a paedo attacking actual pre-pubescent kids. Now if I were the parent of one of these girls I'd certainly be looking to beat the shit out of him if I'd found out at the time. I just don't feel comfortable with wanting to string up his corpse just yet.
Begs the question, why didn't they report it at the time.It was reported on the news last night that someone has come forward claiming that they saw Gary Glitter abusing someone in Jimmy Saviles dressing room, while Jimmy Savile was also abusing someone in there at the same time.
Sick in the extreme if true.