Enigma_87
You know who
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 27,654
Thanks, jb8521.
Nice run and goal.
Nice run and goal.
Ah. I trusted the commentator. I thought it was #5, but his name is Wayne Brown. Yet it clearly is #6, and Matt James. The commentator is clearly ABU.The third goal
Great stuff from King and James.
From previous page..Can someone post a vid of the goal for those who cannot access sky highlights
Not great quality but you can see kings run here
No it isnt. Ask Mads TimmI do not care about speed. Technical ability and brain is the key issue.
To be a top player in that position you have to combine both speed and technical ability. He looks to have a healthy amount of both for a kid his age, we'll see how he develops.I do not care about speed. Technical ability and brain is the key issue.
Oh oh.I do not care about speed. Technical ability and brain is the key issue.
And you can't develop either past the age of 16.I do not care about speed. Technical ability and brain is the key issue.
Technical ability and brain mean feck all when every time you beat someone you don't have the pace to take advantage. Ditto when someone bigger and stronger than you knocks you on your arse every time you challenge for the ball.I do not care about speed. Technical ability and brain is the key issue.
Credit goes to osmecan from the newbies for the videoThanks, jb8521.
Nice run and goal.
A superb athlete requires a minimum amount of technical ability and brain, which does King have? I am not sure, you cannot tell from these youtube clips of a 60 yard sprint.Technical ability and brain mean feck all when every time you beat someone you don't have the pace to take advantage. Ditto when someone bigger and stronger than you knocks you on your arse every time you challenge for the ball.
Stands to reason that someone who is absolutely superb on the ball can partially compensate for a lack of athleticism but it also stands to reason that a superb athlete can partially compensate for a lack of technique. Obviously, a combination of the two is ideal.
But hey, that's just common sense. Don't let it cloud your uniquely fecked up world-view. It never has before.
You haven't seen his games in the Reserves then?A superb athlete requires a minimum amount of technical ability and brain, which does King have? I am not sure, you cannot tell from these youtube clips of a 60 yard sprint.
No, just clips. I have still to see Eikrem play a match too.You haven't seen his games in the Reserves then?
He's good, very good. I was astounded the first time I saw King play. Fergie jnr is probably pleased as punch to get this lad on loan.No, just clips. I have still to see Eikrem play a match too.
feck me you are such a cretinI do not care about speed. Technical ability and brain is the key issue.
LovelyBut hey, that's just common sense. Don't let it cloud your uniquely fecked up world-view. It never has before.
Why do you keep talking about players you've barely seen? Can't you just wait to see if he has the technical quality, so there'd be no need for the vague, pointless comments like so "I do not care about speed. Technical ability and brain is the key issue." ?A superb athlete requires a minimum amount of technical ability and brain, which does King have? I am not sure, you cannot tell from these youtube clips of a 60 yard sprint.
Yes, he does. His dribling ability, for one, is superior to the vast majority of our first team. King is not just a sprinter....A superb athlete requires a minimum amount of technical ability and brain, which does King have? I am not sure, you cannot tell from these youtube clips of a 60 yard sprint.
The clip of the assist is kind of pointless to me. I am trying to lower the excitement over this clip since all it shows is raw speed. A tidy finish, but noot difficult. We can get excited when he demonstrates the ability to keep control of the ball consistently, show an awareness, plays the correct weight of pass etc. Combined with the speed and power. Maybe he can do this, I have not seen him play a match.Why do you keep talking about players you've barely seen? Can't you just wait to see if he has the technical quality, so there'd be no need for the vague, pointless comments like so "I do not care about speed. Technical ability and brain is the key issue." ?
Both King and Eikrem were playing in that game for the reserves against Everton which you were abusing Macheda inThe clip of the assist is kind of pointless to me. I am trying to lower the excitement over this clip since all it shows is raw speed. A tidy finish, but noot difficult. We can get excited when he demonstrates the ability to keep control of the ball consistently, show an awareness, plays the correct weight of pass etc. Combined with the speed and power. Maybe he can do this, I have not seen him play a match.
Yes King was definitely playing. I still can't remember watching them play a whole match though.Both King and Eikrem were playing in that game for the reserves against Everton which you were abusing Macheda in
Then are you just being a complete spastic for the sake of it, then?The clip of the assist is kind of pointless to me. I am trying to lower the excitement over this clip since all it shows is raw speed. A tidy finish, but noot difficult. We can get excited when he demonstrates the ability to keep control of the ball consistently, show an awareness, plays the correct weight of pass etc. Combined with the speed and power. Maybe he can do this, I have not seen him play a match.
Name change to Not Scholesy!I'll probably get dinged for this but, once in a while I've backed Scholsey (the poster) but, seriously - any chance of a board name change - it's a real disservice to the real Scholsey.
You haven't seen him play and yet want to wade into a conversation regarding him - when you see a goal and a superb assist by him -you dismiss it because that isn't enough evidence to soothe your need for a player to be technically adept enough to play football for United.
When people quote your posts and you see Scholsey in front of it - I cringe.