ArmchairCritic
You got pets me too mines are dead
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2011
- Messages
- 16,154
Wouldn't say way out of line, I can kind of see where he's coming from but I still disagree.SAF is way out of line on this.
Wouldn't say way out of line, I can kind of see where he's coming from but I still disagree.SAF is way out of line on this.
Hopefully David Gill is awake to this potential situation; he might have a role to play to settle Fergie down before this goes too far.Ferguson's way out of line here. An elderly white man can't be telling a young black man how he should be handling racism, it's ludicrous. Hopefully he'll take a step back and see a bit of sense on this.
...its about a united front. disagree with the gaffer. but do what he says.Not sure that gives him the right to publicly criticise Rio for something his player feels strongly about.
I suspect the new Vice-Chairman of the FA which funds the Kick It Out Campaign will be backing Fergie on this one.Hopefully David Gill is awake to this potential situation; he might have a role to play to settle Fergie down before this goes too far.
...its about a united front. disagree with the gaffer. but do what he says.
It won't go too far, christ SAF will talk to Rio and if he feels Rio has a valid reason that will be it. I don't that SAF is going to reprimand Rio as severely as some people think.Hopefully David Gill is awake to this potential situation; he might have a role to play to settle Fergie down before this goes too far.
Good point, I'd not considered that.I suspect the new Vice-Chairman of the FA which funds the Kick It Out Campaign will be backing Fergie on this one.
So why hasn't Rio retired from Int'l Football officially if he doesn't like how the FA deal with racism, surely that's a stronger statement?
feck off, his brother has been racially abused and the FA have handled the entire situation with kid gloves despite their anti-racism campaign. Fergie can do one, Rio has all the right in the world to protest.
Boohoo Fergie's feelings are hurt, how the feck do you think the Ferdinand family feel?
Terry's ban was too light, but other than that I don't really know what else they were supposed to do since there were criminal proceedings they needed to wait to be concluded.
feck off, his brother has been racially abused and the FA have handled the entire situation with kid gloves despite their anti-racism campaign. Fergie can do one, Rio has all the right in the world to protest.
Boohoo Fergie's feelings are hurt, how the feck do you think the Ferdinand family feel?
Not if he genuinely believes in the campaign.Shitstorm will be in full flow know. Needless comments from Fergie really.
The CEO of Manchester United which gains its funds via the operations that Sr Alex Ferguson oversees won't be happy with his main asset putting himself in the firing line over an issue of pride.I suspect the new Vice-Chairman of the FA which funds the Kick It Out Campaign will be backing Fergie on this one.
Since when was Sir Alex allowed to punish someone for doing what they believe in? The mother of all hypocrisies here is that Sir Alex gave this little soundbite to the BBC, of all organisations.It won't go too far, christ SAF will talk to Rio and if he feels Rio has a valid reason that will be it. I don't that SAF is going to reprimand Rio as severely as some people think.
Probably cause the racist dick retired first.So why hasn't Rio retired from Int'l Football officially if he doesn't like how the FA deal with racism, surely that's a stronger statement?
Right but Rio might not have discussed this with SAF beforehand and before SAF had made his comments in the media. SAF looked silly then and probably looked sillier after Rio did the same thing which is probably why he's ticked off, it doesn't mean that he and Rio can't talk about it like adults and SAF can empathise with Rio does it?Reading boss Brian McDermott stood firmly behind Roberts.
"Jason has had a very strong view of it and I respect Jason's view," he told Sky Sports News. "It was important to him what he did today. I 100 per cent back him."
That's how it done.
Yep. No one idea why Fergie's so vehemently opposed to Rio and Roberts' stance. Sure, disagree, but not to point where you're out of your depth.Reading boss Brian McDermott stood firmly behind Roberts.
"Jason has had a very strong view of it and I respect Jason's view," he told Sky Sports News. "It was important to him what he did today. I 100 per cent back him."
That's how it done.
How fecking egomaniacal do you have to be to not support a player who is standing up against racism and for his family all over the fact that you said your players would wear a t-shirt.I doubt Sir Alex's feelings are hurt, it's a matter of asserting his authority over his players.
So why hasn't Rio retired from Int'l Football officially if he doesn't like how the FA deal with racism, surely that's a stronger statement?
Stop overanalysing a quote, SAF is a hypocrite yes but he's not a dictator I am sure him and Rio will discuss it and reach a common ground.Since when was Sir Alex allowed to punish someone for doing what they believe in? The mother of all hypocrisies here is that Sir Alex gave this little soundbite to the BBC, of all organisations.
The FA are probably most impacted by this than the club. I think Gill also has to prioritise his role with the FA over United if there is a direct conflict.The CEO of Manchester United which gains its funds via the operations that Sr Alex Ferguson oversees won't be happy with his main asset putting himself in the firing line over an issue of pride.
I think he is doing a campaign that has worked generally well for the past 20 years (your whole life) a good service. I suspect he genuinely believes in the campaign as he can remember what happened in the game before.For what it's worth, I think Sir Alex has been bang out of order here. Credit to him because, in my 20 years of life, I've never felt this against a statement the great man's said. That highlights how fantastic he is usually. On this one though, he's out of order, doing himself no favours, doing the club no favours and completely going against the things he stands for and the things he preaches. This is disappointing, to say the least.
It's not though, it doesn't highlight the issue at all. Only those with conscience will see it. Has anyone in the media railed against the FA on this, whilst they were all busy ripping Serbia's behaviour they totally ignored it took them a fecking year to deal with Terry. For me Rio retiring and releasing a statement outlining his reasons why would have helped him and the cause he's fighting for.
Not retiring is the stronger statement.
Compare:
"I'm black, have been crapped on many times but will still be available should my country come calling because that's what I believe."
To:
"I'm white, got away with murder many times but called it quits as soon as something stuck because I'm bigger than my country."
Who do you think is the bigger man there?
I don't doubt that he believes in the campaign, he's just not seeing the picture. Bottom line is that a seventy something white man telling his black subordinate how he should or shouldn't deal with racism is just a horrendous, horrendous misjudgment, no matter how well intentioned.I think he is doing a campaign that has worked generally well for the past 20 years (your whole life) a good service. I suspect he genuinely believes in the campaign as he can remember what happened in the game before.
I'm sure they will but it'll be Sir Alex who compromises with Rio as there's no reason for Rio to back down on this. Let's say this gets stupidly out of hand, all it takes is for Rio to go public and Sir Alex gets it in the neck. It's a stupid decision from him as a manager.Stop overanalysing a quote, SAF is a hypocrite yes but he's not a dictator I am sure him and Rio will discuss it and reach a common ground.
Publically, yes. Privately, different matter.The FA are probably most impacted by this than the club. I think Gill also has to prioritise his role with the FA over United if there is a direct conflict.
Completely agree, they do a great job. That doesn't mean they're beyond criticism. They've done a fantastic job (assuming we attribute the credit wholly to them as opposed to societal changes) but protecting against complacency is also fair. Honestly speaking, they've been far too silent on this issue (compare the stance of the organisation against black players) and it's good they're being called out on it. They're playing politics and that's not how an organisation like that should be run.I think he is doing a campaign that has worked generally well for the past 20 years (your whole life) a good service. I suspect he genuinely believes in the campaign as he can remember what happened in the game before.
I am not forgetting anything conveniently, SAF could come out next week and say he was in the wrong. With Gill being Vice-Chairman of the FA there's an interesting dynamic to all this. I am surprised SAF aired Rio out like that but as I have said in a roundabout way he's helped Rio.I'm sure they will but it'll be Sir Alex who compromises with Rio as there's no reason for Rio to back down on this. Let's say this gets stupidly out of hand, all it takes is for Rio to go public and Sir Alex gets it in the neck. It's a stupid decision from him as a manager.
You're forgetting, somewhat conveniently, that Sir Alex is famed for backing his players publically. Sir Alex is going all out here to put his public backing behind the organisation -- or at least I'm sure that's how he sees it -- but at a stupid expense and something he should've seen coming.
He's written the story for the ABUs and he's gone against a lot of his own principles to do so. Have you ever seen so many people be almost unanimous against Sir Alex's actions before?
Ok I will change my opinion if you doRandall, do I have to call you names again??
I agree. If they have an issue with the campaign why not try and help them get a more influential voice. There is good people working there so why not help them rather than undermining their work.I think Fergie is correct. I don't see the point in players abandoning the campaign. Not wearing a t-shirt won't achieve anything really.
Is always a work in progress. Rio needs to tell his story in a proper manner. Immature tweets and refusal to wear a shirt is not the right way to go about things.
He would do far more good if he did a revealing interview with a paper or TV station and expressed his concerns.
So should they abandon the campaign completely?We live in a sorry and ignorant world if we need a kick out racism campaign to not be racist.
Exactly. It has already got people talking about it far more than it would do on a normal matchday weekend. Many people will Google the campaign as it has been in the news, and if they also don't feel that it has done enough for the expulsion of racism from the game then they will also spur the campaign on.Rio protesting against the campaign might actually create more awareness of the campaign.
I know you dont like Rio much but its stupid to say SAF is right here. What gives him the right to tell Roberts what to do? He's not even his manager. Even Rio. They clearly feel more strongly about whats being done than the rest and are doing what they think is right.I think Fergie is correct. I don't see the point in players abandoning the campaign. Not wearing a t-shirt won't achieve anything really.
Is always a work in progress. Rio needs to tell his story in a proper manner. Immature tweets and refusal to wear a shirt is not the right way to go about things.
He would do far more good if he did a revealing interview with a paper or TV station and expressed his concerns.