TheReligion
Abusive
Klopp would be much more likeable if he wasn't such a terrible and sore loser. Urghh it's such an ugly quality.
It will take a joint, or rather, united effort of all Manchester clubs.
It's ok doing that when everyone else is shite
So everybody else in England (bar city) and Europe sucks that’s the reasoning? That just sounds real bitter and small time tbh.
Bitter and small time? That's Klopps post game interview today!
Let's be honest are Barca, Real, Bayern etc at their best currently? This is a prime opportunity for a team to dominate and I'm gutted United are stuck where they are at the moment.
Quick example. When United were last dominating under SAF we made several CL finals but were up against one of the best Barcelona teams EVER. Xavi, Iniesta, Busquets, Messi, Puyol...
At the moment many of Europes giants are in transition and Liverpool are taking their chance. Fair play to them. They aren't a GREAT team though in my opinion, right place, right time. Nothing more.
I think the same. Take Van Dijk out that back 5 and are they really that great?
Klopp gets so much out of players. Even shit like Origi and Lallana turn up for him.
He kind of did an even more impressive job with DortmundHas any other manager taken a team as bad as Liverpool were and made them the best team in the world by himself. He did this whilst losing his best players every year. Other than SAF I can't think of a manager who has changed the fortune of a club singlehandedly this much.
Well they did nearly win the PL a few years before with Rodgers. How do we define 'singlehandedly' and 'by himself' though? He's done a terrific job but he has also spent big in achieving, it seems, a league and a CL. How would you view this differently to, say, Jose winning 3 league titles at Chelsea for example? Or, Simeone winning La Liga and 2 Europas (?) at Atletico (have they won anything else?). Or Conte in Juve who made that club a huge force once again?Has any other manager taken a team as bad as Liverpool were and made them the best team in the world by himself. He did this whilst losing his best players every year. Other than SAF I can't think of a manager who has changed the fortune of a club singlehandedly this much.
1 europa league final
2 x CL finals
1 x CL trophy
1 x PL trophy
What an impressive time he's had/having at Liverpool.
Yes. He's lost more than he's won. Maybe there's a trophy for that.
Care to explain that one?Yeh, its called the man utd trophy
He didn't make Dortmund best in the world.He kind of did an even more impressive job with Dortmund
Simeone at Atletico Madrid
Conte at juventus?
He created the best team to have ever played the game. I don't think they were as bad as Liverpool when Pep took over and he did have Messi. Pep along with Klopp are in a league of their own at the moment that is for sure.While we're at it, what about Pep at Barcelona?
Losing his best players every year ?Has any other manager taken a team as bad as Liverpool were and made them the best team in the world by himself. He did this whilst losing his best players every year. Other than SAF I can't think of a manager who has changed the fortune of a club singlehandedly this much.
Their place under Rodgers was helped by Suarez and Sterling which had left by the time Klopp joined. Other than Milner I don't think any of that team remains so this is totally Klopp's team that is what makes it so impressive.Well they did nearly win the PL a few years before with Rodgers. How do we define 'singlehandedly' and 'by himself' though? He's done a terrific job but he has also spent big in achieving, it seems, a league and a CL. How would you view this differently to, say, Jose winning 3 league titles at Chelsea for example? Or, Simeone winning La Liga and 2 Europas (?) at Atletico (have they won anything else?). Or Conte in Juve who made that club a huge force once again?
Fair enough that is more Liverpool than Klopp. They lost Suarez, Sterling and Coutinho since Rodgers 2nd position.Losing his best players every year ?
Their place under Rodgers was helped by Suarez and Sterling which had left by the time Klopp joined. Other than Milner I don't think any of that team remains so this is totally Klopp's team that is what makes it so impressive.
You are making me look bad. Other than Firminho is anyone a starter.Milner
Henderson
Lallana
Firmino
Gomez
Lovren
Origi
Milner, Gomez, Origi and Firmino only worked for a couple of months under Rodgers though.
Yeh, its called the man utd trophy
Henderson.You are making me look bad. Other than Firminho is anyone a starter.
Is this meant to mean something?Yeh, its called the man utd trophy
That makes about as much sense as the majority of your posts on this forum.
The question is can they sustain this insanely brilliant start? I don't think I've ever seen a team so much fitter and faster than opposition teams for long periods. Whatever they are being given is incredible and by that I mean coaching and tactical advice, they look light years ahead of anyone and it breaks my heart to say that.
Normally don't have much time for Tompkins (and his "I anecdotally predicted someone would ship 5 past Brazil at the wc", just blergh). He's longwinded and has had us winning the league by numbers any day now for 15 years.Not intended to WUM, but this is a fascinating read for Liverpool fans, but it also gives some interesting insight into how Klopp has evolved his style to control games. There is a good comparison with Man United in the piece and makes sense based on the United games I've watched
https://tomkinstimes.com/2020/02/how-liverpool-can-dominate-in-all-game-states/
The poor quality of an opponent isn't luck. That's just poor quality.But also liverpool have had a number of close calls and in many of those were saved by poor finishing on the opppnents part - that is luck