But can they exceed that apparent six person limit? If so, why is that in place in the first place?If you check the box, anyone you have included in the conversation can invite additional participants.
But can they exceed that apparent six person limit? If so, why is that in place in the first place?If you check the box, anyone you have included in the conversation can invite additional participants.
Good question - it's an annoying feature.But can they exceed that apparent six person limit? If so, why is that in place in the first place?
Common sense would dictate managers add at least the max number of people possible rather than just 1.Maybe the committe should make sure there is a communication channel set up for all participants to all members of the committe or clarify responsibilities so we know who to send to.
But can they exceed that apparent six person limit? If so, why is that in place in the first place?
@Invictus, can you please increase the limit and make sure your website doesn't cause us any more annoyanceGood question - it's an annoying feature.
Ye I guess you are right that people should take care themselves of sending their picks to as many committe members as possible. I did of course not mean to question the phantastic work that the committe is doing. Please kick him from the committee P-Nut!Common sense would dictate managers add at least the max number of people possible rather than just 1.
Next guy to question the committee's methods would start with -1 points on the table
Please don't kick me out of the committee Pnut
Yeah, true.Common sense would dictate managers add at least the max number of people possible rather than just 1.
Just picked him at random. If he's one of the five names....??Of all the person you could send to...
Add me and P-nut as we're different timezones with smiley.Just picked him at random. If he's one of the five names....??
Will PM you.
By the looks of it not soon. Block list is getting bigger.What's the deadline for this round? Would have been quicker just doing snake
Oh ffs. I already hate Isotope and Sjor for simply getting their picks the first time around. And how the feck did @MJJ get Schmeichel as his third option?By the looks of it not soon. Block list is getting bigger.
Done.Add me and P-nut as we're different timezones with smiley.
Spam prevention. If a newly registered member sends you and 5 other members some random spam info, you won't include other members in, will you?But can they exceed that apparent six person limit? If so, why is that in place in the first place?
Think so, yeah.Do we keep picking until we get 3?
You are lucky I am not playing. Or we would have blocked each otherThe keeper for whom Yashin said it is the best he ever seen? Goes in my favorite 11 of all time.
Anyway, you won't believe it. I sent my picks.
Happy to hear about that, but am not progressing brilliantly either way.You are lucky I am not playing. Or we would have blocked each other
Sent you PM about Grosics pick only if you can clear that out. Cheers.Think that is correct, any issues let me know.
Didn't think of that - makes sense, of course.Spam prevention. If a newly registered member sends you and 5 other members some random spam info, you won't include other members in, will you?
Mistake on my part here, Grosics was Jim Beam star pick so he should have got him this round. I'll edit the teamsheetSent you PM about Grosics pick only if you can clear that out. Cheers.