Lionel Messi is OFFICIALLY the Greatest Player of all Time (CONFIRMED OFFICIAL)

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,421
Location
left wing
Anyone trying to edge Ronaldo into the Messi-Pele-Maradona debate is an absolute cringe merchant.
He wouldn't even be in the conversation for me, but seems spurious not to acknowledge that he is (or was) for many others... After this win, I think that Messi's status as the greatest of all time will become the majority opinion among football fans.
 

genardk

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 19, 2021
Messages
500
Supports
Juventus
Yup. I thought that Sporting poster made a fair point about Martinez having a vital save at the end, just like Eder provided a vital goal for Portugal in 2016. Small margins.
What small margin?

The difference is Messi actually played in the final scoring 2 goals, initiating the other goal, creating many clear cut chances in the final unlike Ronaldo who has not played for more than 15 minutes in the EC final and the supposedly weak Portuguese team "without Ronaldo" won the EC in Paris against France so that he could get all the credit in the end..
 
Last edited:

SirReginald

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
2,295
Supports
Chelsea
He wouldn't even be in the conversation for me, but seems spurious not to acknowledge that he is (or was) for many others... After this win, I think that Messi's status as the greatest of all time will become the majority opinion among football fans.
Undoubtedly Ronaldo is one of the best natural goal scorers of all time, he was the complete package but his narcissism is outrageous and a complete turn off for a lot of people, though it’s probably what attracts Piers Morgan to him.

Both were great to watch at the peaks especially as they had opposite approaches to the game, one would beat players in a slalom and the other for just sheer pace. Though I’ve personally always believed Messi was better purely because he too could post huge numbers and could also contribute to the team more than Ronaldo would.

Either way it’s like comparing a scalpel to a chainsaw.
 

genardk

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 19, 2021
Messages
500
Supports
Juventus
I don't know what to say about that, it's not like Ronaldo won underserved Ballon D'ors. The competition was so high between them in their prime that it was very difficult to choose in some cases. Ronaldo had seasons when he scored 60+ goals.
The fact that Modric(imo a little underserved) and Benzema won them after Ronaldo's departure does not detract from his merits. Messi had a great team around him also that helped him shine.

Overall, I think the difference between them is not that big but overall Messi is the better player, no doubt. Also, maybe Messi has another year or two left to achieve even more, whereas Ronaldo seems finished.
The difference is too big as Ronaldo never had the technical. creativity, playmaking abilities at the GOAT level or never considered a GOAT level dribbler.
He cannot be compared to creative playmaking geniuses like Maradona, Cruyff, Messi, Xavi, Modric etc. as he simply lacks those skills..

The only reason he was involved in the conversation is his goals output, and Messi easily matches him in that while at the same time being one of the greatest playmakers, creators, dribbles ever..

If Gerd Muller played in this social media age, he would definitely be seen as a GOAT too with what he did.. Ronaldo owes a lot to the presence and power of social media..
 

FrankFoot

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2022
Messages
1,377
Location
Chile / Czech Republic
Supports
Neutral
Pele > Messi > Ronaldo > Maradona

The real takeaway is that the Argies have produced two of the top four footballers of all time. Incredible, especially for a country which has as many challenges as Argentina does.
Argentina might have challenges as a country now.
But the massive european influence in the early days of football clearly helped them to set the difference comparing to their neighbors Peru,Ecuador,Chile, Paraguay, etc
 

fergiewherearethou

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2022
Messages
1,602
Location
Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubuna
Supports
Erik ten Hag
The difference is too big as Ronaldo never had the technical. creativity, playmaking abilities at the GOAT level or never considered a GOAT level dribbler.
He cannot be compared to creative playmaking geniuses like Maradona, Cruyff, Messi, Xavi, Modric etc. as he simply lacks those skills..

The only reason he was involved in the conversation is his goals output, and Messi easily matches him in that while at the same time being one of the greatest playmakers, creators, dribbles ever..
Well Ronaldo actually was far better than Xavi, Modric and a lot of other players in terms of dribbling and technical qualities when he was younger, did you even saw him play for Manchester United?
He's style surely changed with the years but let's be honest, Ronaldo imo is a far better player than Maradona or Cruyff, nevermind the others you mentioned.

Messi is the best ever, that I have no doubt about.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,743
Location
india
The difference is too big as Ronaldo never had the technical. creativity, playmaking abilities at the GOAT level or never considered a GOAT level dribbler.
He cannot be compared to creative playmaking geniuses like Maradona, Cruyff, Messi, Xavi, Modric etc. as he simply lacks those skills..

The only reason he was involved in the conversation is his goals output, and Messi easily matches him in that while at the same time being one of the greatest playmakers, creators, dribbles ever..

If Gerd Muller played in this social media age, he would definitely be seen as a GOAT too with what he did.. Ronaldo owes a lot to the presence and power of social media..
To be honest I hate this term goat. Everything now is goat this goat that. Someone praised Modric calling him a goat which apparently meant goat midfielder. fecksake.

But yeah what separates Messi from the footballers I've seen (as I can't compare him to one's I havent) is that he's elite at playmaking, goalscoring and dribbling (and trophy count if it matters). It's just absurd to be that good at so many things. Which is why it may a decade or so till we see another.
 

genardk

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 19, 2021
Messages
500
Supports
Juventus
Well Ronaldo actually was far better than Xavi, Modric and a lot of other players in terms of dribbling and technical qualities when he was younger, did you even saw him play for Manchester United?
Are you seriously telling me he is in the same technical universe as Modric and Xavi, I mean really??
At United, he was an explosive player exciting to watch, this is not the same thing as technique..

He's style surely changed with the years but let's be honest, Ronaldo imo is a far better player than Maradona or Cruyff, nevermind the others you mentioned.
Let's be honest.. Ronaldo is not comparable to Maradona for the big majority of football fans, it is a different level.. I have never seen Ronaldo being compared to Pele or Maradona.. As for Cruyff, again, Ronaldo is no match in terms of talent..

Ronaldo is more comparable to Gerd Muller than any of these geniuses..
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
Well Ronaldo actually was far better than Xavi, Modric and a lot of other players in terms of dribbling and technical qualities when he was younger, did you even saw him play for Manchester United?
He's style surely changed with the years but let's be honest, Ronaldo imo is a far better player than Maradona or Cruyff, nevermind the others you mentioned.

Messi is the best ever, that I have no doubt about.
Was he?
 

Andrade

Rebuilding Expert
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Messages
2,460
Just to remind everyone that this thread is to celebrate Messi, not about bringing other legends from the past and giving them "GOAT" arguments. There are no more arguments for others as GOATs, only subjective opinions.

When Pele and Maradona played (especially Pele) game was still amateur. When Maradona played, game elevated to a more serious competition but you could still smoke cigs and play. Today you can barely skip a training session and be ready for the game.
Please stop talking nonsense
 

wr8_utd

:'(
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
38,227
Going by that logic, winning Champions League for RM was easier since they already had 9 before Cristiano came while Barcelona had only 1 before Messi came, therefore Messi CL achivements are more difficult than Cristianos.
Love it :lol:
 

4bars

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Messages
4,911
Supports
Barcelona
Haaland is a monster, but the big question mark with him is whether or not he will customarily deliver in massive games, because he hasn't played in any thus far. With Mbappe, we already know that he's a Billy Big-Time with bells on.
I agree. But i truly think it will be the debate of the next decade
 

CruyffMaradonaMessi

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 26, 2022
Messages
126
Location
Italo-Spaniard in exile
Supports
FC Barcelona
Imagine seriously "arguing" that C. Ronaldo of all players ( :lol: ) is a better talent and footballer than Lionel Messi let alone that he has had a better career resume.

I can only think of Portugal supporters (I would imagine that even most of them deep down already know and recognize that Messi is the better player and talent), fanatical RM fans the likes of Tomás Roncero and his insufferable likes that had to suffer from Barça's and Messi dominance and in the process numerous spankings in head to head games like never before and the most uncritical and deluded pro-CR7 fanboys among the Man Utd fanbase (given the recent events I imagine that this percentage is tiny nowadays). I can't think of anyone else.

Even on a Man Utd and English/UK/Irish dominated forum like this one, 80-90% (from what I can see) rate Messi far higher and have done so long before the 2022 World Cup.

No point even mentioning what the majority of the football greats (players and managers alike) and football experts think in this debate and that was also the case for a very long time.

The greatest legacy of C. Ronaldo will be that he was even in the conversation for this long, although this was mostly a media created conversation as any sane football fan should be able to see (easily) who the better and more talented player is and has always been.

Anyway the GOAT debate is pretty much over. The worst that can happen for Messi is that his biggest critics will rate him alongside the other 2 widely established greats in Pelé and Maradona.

The story of Messi is not over though. Although it might be unrealistic, I would love to see him try to compete for the Copa América in 2024 and the World Cup in 2026. It would be such a shame and an incredible waste of talent if he went to the MLS next summer. Although it is unlikely to happen, I would love for him to return to Barça next summer. The way he was forced to leave was criminal (thanks to arguably the worst club president and junta in football history) for the greatest performer at a single club in football history and after 21 years of unmatched service.
 
Last edited:

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,017
Do we have an annual top ten award on the caf for insane comments? How about this one?

“When Pele and Maradona played (especially Pele) game was still amateur.”
 

Cassanata99

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 29, 2021
Messages
27
Just to remind everyone that this thread is to celebrate Messi, not about bringing other legends from the past and giving them "GOAT" arguments. There are no more arguments for others as GOATs, only subjective opinions.

When Pele and Maradona played (especially Pele) game was still amateur. When Maradona played, game elevated to a more serious competition but you could still smoke cigs and play. Today you can barely skip a training session and be ready for the game.
The game has changed but it's also become a lot easier for attacking players to flourish now and get more goals and assists. Players are protected more these days. It's no coincidence that in the last 15 years we've started to see players regularly get close to 40+ goals a season for large periods of their career (Messi, Ronaldo, Lewandowski, Suarez, Mbappe, Haaland, Salah). This used to be a rarity in the 70's, 80's and 90's. Maradona and Pele played on terrible pitches (compared to today's) and were also subject to physical assault on a regular basis.

That's why I don't really believe in a single GOAT. You can't fairly compare different era's.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,270
Location
Croatia
Going by that logic, winning Champions League for RM was easier since they already had 9 before Cristiano came while Barcelona had only 1 before Messi came, therefore Messi CL achivements are more difficult than Cristianos.
Game, set and match.
 

Lay

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
20,033
Location
England
Different type of players. Mbappe v Ronaldo would be more apt. Personally I can't put Ronaldo in the same bracket as players like Messi, Maradona or Pele. Way different skill sets in what I enjoy more in a player. Mbappe the same which isn't to say he's not a great player.
Mbappe v C.Ronaldo will actually become a good debate at some point. I reckon Mbappe will surpass Cristiano eventually
 

Il Prete Rosso

Prete, the Italian Pete
Joined
Feb 11, 2012
Messages
4,498
Location
Ospedale della Pietà
Well Ronaldo actually was far better than Xavi, Modric and a lot of other players in terms of dribbling and technical qualities when he was younger, did you even saw him play for Manchester United?
He's style surely changed with the years but let's be honest, Ronaldo imo is a far better player than Maradona or Cruyff, nevermind the others you mentioned.

Messi is the best ever, that I have no doubt about.
How old are you?
 

fergiewherearethou

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2022
Messages
1,602
Location
Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubuna
Supports
Erik ten Hag
Are you seriously telling me he is in the same technical universe as Modric and Xavi, I mean really??
At United, he was an explosive player exciting to watch, this is not the same thing as technique..



Let's be honest.. Ronaldo is not comparable to Maradona for the big majority of football fans, it is a different level.. I have never seen Ronaldo being compared to Pele or Maradona.. As for Cruyff, again, Ronaldo is no match in terms of talent..

Ronaldo is more comparable to Gerd Muller than any of these geniuses..

If by technical you mean, dribbling or beating a man with the ball at the feet, then yes, I think Ronaldo until 25 was better than Xavi or Modric. Afterwards, his style went into another direction.

I'm not comparing Ronaldo with Maradona or Pele in terms of position vs position on the pitch. My opinion is that Ronaldo, in the history of this sport, will be regarded a better player overall than Pele or Maradona, because of goals scored, team trophies, individual accolades, personal records and so on.

I never seen Pele kick a ball and I've only seen Maradona a couple of times when his career was already declining, maybe I'm wrong.
 

RacingClub

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2021
Messages
2,048
Supports
Racing Club
I wrote this in response to a post (Pre semi final I think) asking would Messi be recognized as Maradonas equal (or higher) if he were to win the world cup but I think it applies here.

I think he will be a lot closer (especially with the younger generations who are more critical of Maradonas flaws) but ultimately most will favor Diego due to reasons that are hard for non Argentines to understand.

I wasn't born in Argentina, I just reside here (for my sins) so it took me awhile to appreciate what Maradona means to the Argentine people.

I'd frequently get into "debates" with friends and family who would ignore pretty much any stat I could give that would show Messi's superiority over Maradona etc but year on year I grew to appreciate the fact that while you can attempt to quantify their rationale (The world cup) the love/ appreciation they have for Diego Maradona is unquantifiable.

It's emotional and spiritual and although he was one of the finest footballers In the history of world football it's nearly secondary to the feelings of hope that he gave an entire nation in bleak times.

Had Maradona died when I first arrived I wouldn't have understood the significance of the event, after some years here I could empathise with my friends and family members who wept tears of sadness that he was finally gone while crying tears of joy when talking about the impact he had on their lives.

Messi can't do that.

He can't recreate the feeling around Argentina around the fall of the Military Junta and the Malvinas (Falklands) War.

Diego fought for them at their lowest point and won.

Argentina is a beautiful country with a proud people but in many ways the beauty is only skin deep and superficial while the pride is rooted in events that move further away as time passes.

Spend enough time here and you feel the profound sadness, the country feels like an ageing supermodel/movie star desperately clinging onto their youth when they were the best thing around and are now struggling to come to terms with their wrinkles and weight gain.

They long for years gone by.

You see the collapse of a great nation in its older buildings, built to the highest standards years ago during prosperous times but falling into disrepair nowadays alongside signs on stores (abandoned now) when the dollar and peso had parity (it's around 300/1 now).

This country is in desperate need of a hero and I really hope that Messi can do it for all of us here.

If he does he will be second only to Diego IMO but he won't replace him as God around these parts (but to be honest no body could).
 

Fearless

Mighty Mouse
Joined
Apr 24, 2003
Messages
4,460
Location
The Pink Torpedo Club
It's hard to argue against it even deep down Piers know who is the Goat.
Of course, The only real metric is in winning everything that the entire sport has to offer. And, if you're going to nit-pick, doing it it in such a way that is utterly jaw-dropping, exemplary and crossing that rare threshold where a sport turns into art .
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,743
Location
india
The shift in his / Argentina NTs fortunes have been insane. After their 2018 WC exit you'd and all those finals you couldn't have predicted a Copa and an all time WC final win in the space of 3 years.
 

Pascal Quiff

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 8, 2022
Messages
360
Supports
Liverpool
It's easily between Pele, Messi and Buffon. Pick your poison, basically.
 

Vidyoyo

The bad "V"
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
21,350
Location
Not into locations = will not dwell
So for argument's sake let's say Messi has played 863 games for club and country, while Ronaldo has played a total of 951 games overall.

Arguably it's only been in Ronaldo's last 30-40 games that people have felt confident proclaiming Messi as the undisputed GOAT while saying Ronaldo is now a complete liability.

Let's also say Messi has a decent rest of the season with PSG but then next year - when he gets nearer to Ronaldo's game total - falls off a cliff in terms of performances.

Will we be okay saying Messi isn't all that just like we're saying about Ronaldo?

white text before anybody takes me too seriously
 
Last edited:

the_cliff

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
5,587
So for argument's sake let's say Messi has played 863 games for club and country, while Ronaldo has played a total of 951 games overall.

Arguably it's only been in Ronaldo's last 30-40 games that people have felt confident proclaiming Messi as the undisputed GOAT while saying Ronaldo is a complete liability.

Let's also say Messi has a decent rest of the season but then next year - when he gets nearer to Ronaldo's game total - falls off a cliff in terms of performance.

Will we suddenly be saying Messi isn't all that just like we're happy saying about Ronaldo?

white text before anybody takes me dramatically seriously but still keen to post the quesiton
Depends if Messi decides to do an interview with Piers Morgan.
 

FriedClams

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2021
Messages
3,688
So for argument's sake let's say Messi has played 863 games for club and country, while Ronaldo has played a total of 951 games overall.

Arguably it's only been in Ronaldo's last 30-40 games that people have felt confident proclaiming Messi as the undisputed GOAT while saying Ronaldo is suddenly a complete liability.

Let's also say Messi has a decent rest of the season with PSG but then next year - when he gets nearer to Ronaldo's game total - falls off a cliff in terms of performances.

Will we suddenly be saying Messi isn't all that just like we're saying about Ronaldo?

white text before anybody takes me too seriously
I saw the white text, but your post does have some point to it based on the way the internet football fan thinks.

I have a sneaky suspicion that the last chapter of both their career's is yet to be written.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,743
Location
india
So for argument's sake let's say Messi has played 863 games for club and country, while Ronaldo has played a total of 951 games overall.

Arguably it's only been in Ronaldo's last 30-40 games that people have felt confident proclaiming Messi as the undisputed GOAT while saying Ronaldo is now a complete liability.

Let's also say Messi has a decent rest of the season with PSG but then next year - when he gets nearer to Ronaldo's game total - falls off a cliff in terms of performances.

Will we be okay saying Messi isn't all that just like we're saying about Ronaldo?

white text before anybody takes me too seriously
Messi has always been the better footballer. One just has to pay attention to their actual performances.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,635
Location
London
I suppose if you believe football is generally played to a higher level now than in the past then someone could be the greatest (as in the best footballer relative to their era) without being better than a current day footballer in terms of a direct comparison of skills or level of play.

Like in Chess for example, where you could argue that Gary Kasparov is the greatest Chess player of all time despite Magnus Carlsen having played a higher level of Chess than Kasparov ever did.
Exactly. Until yesterday, people might have argued that Pele/Maradona were greater players than Messi, despite Messi being way better than them (for example, I think that he is better than Maradona ever was at practically everything and better than Pele at everything except heading).

A bit like how Sir Isaac Newton being the greatest physicist of all time, despite that any modern physicist is way better at physics than him. Or how pretty much any modern general knows more about the warfare than Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan and Napoleon put together. It is the natural way of thinks, but somehow there are people (who usually have never seen Pele and co play) who claim that they were better than the modern robots.

Or take the ‘greatest dribbler of all time’ Garrincha, and check his videos. There is nothing great on those videos if you compare with modern footballers. Most of them are running straight with defenders being 5m away, followed by some crosses in keeper’s hand or Row Z. The likes of Nani or Robben, let alone Messi, dribbled better than him. Or go and check the decision making of the past greats. Massive disappointment.
 

Gazza

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2000
Messages
32,644
Location
'tis a silly place
Yeah the fact that so many people across the internet / social media, get so worked up and heated when debating who the mythical 'GOAT' is in whatever sport, day after day, month after month etc., in many cases I'm sure getting themselves banned from whatever forums / platforms they're on as well, just seems farcical to me. You see comical exchanges where people get so angry that they cannot convince either other their favourite player is the undisputed GOAT (of course there's no such thing), and just cannot enjoy the fact that those players had an amazing career.

It tennis, I've seen people getting banned and creating multiple accounts on YouTube, reddit etc. to make the exact same arguments that their favourite player is the GOAT. As toxic as debates between fanboys / fangirls of modern day big 3 players have been, the Graf vs. Seles debates on the women's side have been on a whole different level.

I spend a lot of time in the US, and I had to avoid shows such as First Take / the Undisputed (as entertaining as Shannon Sharpe is) after a while, with their obsession with GOAT debates in basketball in-particular (there seemed to be almost daily Jordan vs. Lebron debates and regular all-time top 10 segments) and also the NFL (although the NFL segments are generally better than the NBA ones because more active NFL teams move the needle). When they branched out and discussed other topics, those not involving Lebron, Brady etc., the segments were usually more enjoyable.
First Take is a good example — every time I catch some of it, they’re just comparing and critiquing each others’ lists!
 

Scandi Red

Hates Music.
Joined
Sep 25, 2022
Messages
4,745
If you don't think that Messi is the GOAT, then I will only accept the explanation if you subscribe to the idea that you can't compare players across eras and that Maradona and Pele very well could have been as good if they were born later. But in this case you kind of agree that Messi is the GOAT. It's just that he has to share the spotlight with some other players, which is fair enough.

Any other explanation will just be wrong. Whether you focus on hard data or skill Messi comes out on top.
 

FriedClams

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2021
Messages
3,688
Going by that logic, winning Champions League for RM was easier since they already had 9 before Cristiano came while Barcelona had only 1 before Messi came, therefore Messi CL achivements are more difficult than Cristianos.
I am keen to see the response to this. Don't ever underestimate the power of that poster though, he WILL have a spin on it.
 

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,162
So for argument's sake let's say Messi has played 863 games for club and country, while Ronaldo has played a total of 951 games overall.

Arguably it's only been in Ronaldo's last 30-40 games that people have felt confident proclaiming Messi as the undisputed GOAT while saying Ronaldo is now a complete liability.

Let's also say Messi has a decent rest of the season with PSG but then next year - when he gets nearer to Ronaldo's game total - falls off a cliff in terms of performances.

Will we be okay saying Messi isn't all that just like we're saying about Ronaldo?

white text before anybody takes me too seriously
A lot of players, managers and pundits have called him the best ever since 2010/2011 including Ronaldo´s ex team mates.

Edit: Damn white text