How's his crossing? Also does he like to stay out wide or cut inside?It would be a smart acquisition: excellent price-quality ratio in the current crazy market. A deal around 25 millions of euros should be possible and we are talking about an offensive player.
At least, he's a proven winger with a god pace and decent stats: he scored 20 goals last season all competitions.
Potential for improvement if he plays under the right coach.
Even if his football IQ isn't his best asset, he will clearly strengthen your squad: more choices for the coach, more competition. within the squad...
He's a fresh quality player.
He's not a proven winger, all he has proved is that he's a headless chicken. We have wasted enough money on players not up to the required standard.How's his crossing? Also does he like to stay out wide or cut inside?
Mostly on the outside as he's right footed and plays on the right, he does come inside but not as square on as inverted wingers do.How's his crossing? Also does he like to stay out wide or cut inside?
United needs an additional offensive player, which will boost the team by introducing fresh blood and more competition.After watching some vids of him (full games) not too impressed. He's a solid squad option for any side but nothing more than that. Tactically he'd be a good option, someone who can stretch play down that right.. but unless he's coming for peanuts, Mahrez is far superior.
Lingard still sucks on the wing. He is a number 10 without a doubt. If you play him on the wing he still spends 99% of the game roaming the middle, if we bought lucas it would make sense as we currently have no player who can operate down the right-hand side even in the slightest. Not saying Lucas is the right man or is good enough but in theory, it makes perfect sense.Call me crazy but on current form, would much rather see Lingard play than Lucas.
Plus he rejected us in 2011 when SAF came calling. Let him "suffer."
True but my opinion on Lucas is formed on me being a proponent of utilizing a fluid 4-3-3 setup which wouldn't require the use of a no 10, so lingard would play on the right anyway and drift in centrally as he currently does.Lingard still sucks on the wing. He is a number 10 without a doubt. If you play him on the wing he still spends 99% of the game roaming the middle, if we bought lucas it would make sense as we currently have no player who can operate down the right-hand side even in the slightest. Not saying Lucas is the right man or is good enough but in theory, it makes perfect sense.
Also Custis has been reliable for us.
True but my opinion on Lucas is formed on me being a proponent of utilizing a fluid 4-3-3 setup which wouldn't require the use of a no 10, so lingard would play on the right anyway and drift in centrally as he currently does.
But ultimately what matters is what Jose wants and 4-2-3-1 is our destiny.
Is that LvG's tubby custard mate?
Not really, I'm not a fan of Willian but he's an intelligent and tactically astute player.Would do a similar job to that of Willian I think from what I have seen of him.
That price is quite close to Mahrez type fee.
If only.Would do a similar job to that of Willian I think from what I have seen of him.
Agree, Hazard - when he is at his best - would play for anyone, even for José. But it is also the case that when Hazard's formed derailed a bit he was not playing. Even on his best day Mahrez does not work "José-hard" for his team and when his form is not 100% it tends to be like 25% - so not a José player for me at all.Hazard had his best ever season under Mourinho.
This is probably the most accurate description anyone here has said about him. I really don't understand when people on here still call him a 'headless chicken', it makes me think they haven't really seen him play since his Sao Paulo days. Sometimes I watch him play and want him to be more direct because he gets into a good position and looks to pass when he should try and beat his man because thats what he is best at doing. PSG have probably trained some of his best qualities out of him, his game has changed a lot since hes come to PSG. Having said that, he hasn't necessarily been playing bad, last season was one of his best with 19 goals and 11 assists, and hes always played an important role in the squad every season up until this one. If he came to Europe and was still playing exactly the same as he did in Brazil (which it seems most people on here think is the case) then this would be a red flag and I definitely wouldn't consider buying him. But having followed his career since joining PSG I can see that hes not as brainless as everyone makes him out to be and could be very applicable under the hands of Mourinho, so I think this could actually be a really good deal, especially if its a loan because that means if it doesn't work out then Mahrez is still a great option in the summer. Of course Mahrez is the best option but people shouldn't be looking at the option of Lucas as negatively as they are.He actually regressed rather than improved. I remember when he was fresh off the "boat" from Brazil he had an immense performance against Valencia away, giving Guardado all sorts of trouble.
He's one of those 'nice guys' that try to follow the script too much when getting to Europe, meaning if he's told to take less players 1 on 1 and pass more, he'll actually overdo it. You could see him getting into his head too much, they tried him in the opposite wing which was awful as well.
Mourinho speaks his language and likes him. If he tells him to focus on being a winger in the mold of Bale and just take on people without caring, and if he gets confidence back, he can actually become a useful player. It all depends on the price. He's rapid.
It'd probably a heavily structured fee though. Say 20M up front and then add ons according to various metrics of success. I'm always ok with those types of fee structures.I just read the price, £40M for a guy that can't get a game? Half that would be closer to reality.
With the state of our current wingers, we probably do.We don’t need a PSG reject.
Ehh, but did you watch any of his Roma performances? His speed was his only, and I emphasize this, only ability in their aquadSalah had the actual numbers to back up a certain expectation last year, Moura simply does not.
40m poundsUnited needs an additional offensive player, which will boost the team by introducing fresh blood and more competition.
Last season, Di Maria woke up in January 17 after Draxler joined PSG
Lucas is more explosive/forward while Mahrez is more playmaker. In any scenario, everything depends on the price: if Lucas is worth 20 millions, then it's a smart deal in the current market IMO
By the way, what is the market value of Mahrez?
But not playing very much as a striker since!How is lucas a RW going to push Rashford who broke on to the scene and had his best performances as a striker?
because we have no wingers, he can play wide and is too good to just bench and await Lukaku and Zlatan to be put to play upfront.But not playing very much as a striker since!
Walcott with mad dribbling skillsIs he more similar to Nani or Douglas Costa?
Ribery or Robben?
You mean right, right?I'd take him on loan for the rest of the season to see how it goes. He could easily converted into a conventional winger, he doesn't fit into PSG's team anymore because they want to play with a front three like Barcelona. He could still do a job for us and we could do with some depth on the left.
So many assumptions made in that post! Lazy? Apathetic? How do you know he’s not busting his balls every day in training? How do you know that he hasn’t asked for a move? So what if he likes living in Paris?He is very talented in terms of close control, dribbling, pace. But he's lazy, or lets say, apathetic, comfortable with a situation where he will never play.
He probably could move to another big team last season but i think he just want to be there in Paris..
I dont believe he is a player with ambition to improve.