Yes, the point is that after signing his previous bumper new contract, he went on to have definitely his best season up to that point the next season and had 3 out of 4 seasons under that contract where he was one of the most productive LWs in the world.
I don’t think his new contract has anything to do with his current form. I think what is clear though is that he doesn’t react well to adversity. The team is underperforming, he sees the problems and gets frustrated. Rather than leading by example, he then lets his head go down and plays worse (especially when played on the RW where everyone, including him, knows he struggles). Whether there are other off-field issues affecting him is obviously unknown.
Whilst this is obviously a very frustrating flaw, it’s one that the right coach should be able to eradicate (a player being solely motivated by money would be more difficult). Players who can contribute 30+goals at top level do not grow on trees. Son, for example, who is being lauded as a great player Rashford should aspire to has never scored more than 24, and arguably the Spurs team he has played for has generally been a lot stronger than the disjointed mess we’ve had since Rashford emerged.
Personally, I would bench Rashford for the next game as his head hasn’t looked right at all the last few matches. When he is introduced that has to be on the LW (or at a push at CF). We need him to somehow get his mojo back as no other player in our frontline has demonstrated even close to being able to match his top level in their careers.
You're right, and i should have checked first. I was just explaining that it wasn't intentional, i mixed up his first excellent season at the club with the general state of euphoria in the early days of the Solskjaer era.
I also agree with your point that he doesn't respond very well to adversity. Again, it's not just him. It's more of a general issue that seems to permeate the club. I've also argued earlier in this thread that you can't simply throw him away and expect to be just fine, at least in the short-term, without his goals. The same goes for Bruno etc. On the other hand, the way he wants to play the game and the type of player he's become (indulged by the club, too), creates a conundrum for anyone who occupies the hot seat at the edge of the bench. Let's not forget that we let goalscorers greater than Rashford go, and the team became significantly better. But it wasn't an abrupt cutting of the chord, it happened more organically. A passing of the baton, if you like, with the club not being in the sorry state it is now, either. Which, admittedly, is something that raises the risks and creates questions about what is the best way to move forward.
Furthermore, i don't think that everything starts and ends with his starting position on the pitch. For me, it has to do with his role. He wants to start on the left, but he also wants to be the primary finisher. His best seasons came when he had either Martial or... basically nobody to lead the line. He thrives when the movement around him drags defenders out of position so that he can either attack the pocket of space in-behind or go 1v1 against an opposition defender (preferably a centre-half, not FB, which can occur with overlaps/underlaps or one of the midfielders moving there). That's his element, when he can rely mostly on his instincts. His most unspectacular seasons are when there's another focal point in the box (Lukaku, Ronaldo, Hojlund), which forces him into a more traditional role as a wide player. It's required of him to do "midfield" things and assess the game better, which isn't his strong suit, and he doesn't fancy it much. "You wouldn't ask Ronaldo to start flinging crosses in the box" might be his line of thinking when he throws his hands in the air and stops running.