Nobody challenged you? Do you have memory issues?
I told you in the very first post to check official reported wages from financial report, not some tinpot shit site.
You said which player wages is wrong and I told you why reported wages for players is shit way to come up with total wages as there is a big difference in how wages are reported by media for different clubs.
2 days later you are repeating the same thing.
I'm not repeating it, i'm saying why I posted it in the first place because someone mocked
I already told you my opinion for financial reports after I looked into it when you mentioned it. The financial report for United is for almost 1000 employees, whereas the first team mens squad is 30 people. I am fully aware that the first team contribute to a large amount of the total, but considering my point was about first team wages and transfer fees, i'd rather not look at a number which is given for 950 other people of which we have 0 clue how it's broken down or where it goes.
And again, you are just completely ignoring the fact where I said multiple times I understand the actual numbers might vary, but I imagine the ratio is similar. It isn't that strange to assume United, who have 10 more first team players than City including the likes of Ronaldo, Sancho, de Gea, Varane, Bruno, Martial, Rashford who are on big wages, have a higher first team wage than City.
You are also ignoring the fact i'm looking more at next seasons potential values which isn't attainable as the reports aren't out yet so for now i'm using the information I have.