Vidic_In_Moscow
rectum-faced pygmy
Convert to Moggism to try and reverse the trend?Do it
Convert to Moggism to try and reverse the trend?Do it
If there was a person that had to get stuffed and put in the natural history museum, nobody would look as at home as JRM would.The last of his kind, waiting to stuffed and put in the National History museum.
Truss vs Meloni (our own far-right dumwit going to win our 25/9 general election and become the next Italian PM) is going to be a classic, the well-disguised sisterhood for a common, minionic, nuklear Dystopianistan against Mad Vlad’s baddies.I was incidentally asked to have a look at the latest TV debate for a small Italian news outlet. Knowing one thing or two about idiots pretending to be statemen and spouting c*ap, I have to say that imho the only person remotely aware of the magnitude of the issues and the task ahead is Sunak.
I was quite open to the idea of Truss PM, cos it'll be a hilarious year or so... But Mogg will be Chancellor won't he... Oh lordi.Chancellor Mogg would whip the country’s finances into shape real good
This isn't the traditional Tory party though, most of those with competence were purged when Boris took power, this is the Brexit party.I think Tories always end up going with the most competent option when it comes down to it so I think Sunak will get it
Go on Stoke, make the most of your brexit freedomsTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
You’d choose Johnson over someone whose party has never even had the chance to be in power?If had to choose a leader between Boris, Lizzie, Rishi, and Keir I'd reluctantly with a heavy heart choose Boris. I am positive this forum has better candidates than those three being imposed on us.
Labour without Keir would be an ideal scenario. He's ideally suited for Madame Tussauds (characterless) and also too right-wing for my liking.You’d choose Johnson over someone whose party has never even had the chance to be in power?
Compared to Johnson?!Labour without Keir would be an ideal scenario. He's ideally suited for Madame Tussauds (characterless) and also too right-wing for my liking.
Is that even a question?Compared to Johnson?!
But you said you'd pick Johnson over Starmer? I'm very confused.Is that even a question?
The Tory members don't trust Sunak. They're not sure why. Can't quite put their old,male,white fingers on the exact reason...Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That's surprising!If had to choose a leader between Boris, Lizzie, Rishi, and Keir I'd reluctantly with a heavy heart choose Boris. I am positive this forum has better candidates than those three being imposed on us.
Is that even a question?
Exactly, what he said!But you said you'd pick Johnson over Starmer? I'm very confused.
Reading back to the post that came out wrong.But you said you'd pick Johnson over Starmer? I'm very confused.
But.. But... He got the big calls right.... He nearly died from Covid.... He was a laugh on Have I Got News For You 20 years ago.... He says it how it is.... It was only a slice of birthday cake...Boris is literally a criminal, why would ANYONE wish to have a criminal in power??
Would you vote Tory? Or does that mean you'd vote Lib Dem?With a choice purely between Truss, Sunak, and BoJo in the Conservative party. I would take the best of the worst. If Startmer remains the leader I will not vote for Labour for only the 3rd occasion in my life.
It is this kind of attitude that will give Tories a win at the next election. Remember you are not voting for Starmer, you are voting for Labour and their approach to supporting and governing the country.Reading back to the post that came out wrong.
With a choice purely between Truss, Sunak, and BoJo in the Conservative party. I would take the best of the worst. If Startmer remains the leader I will not vote for Labour for only the 3rd occasion in my life.
Never voted Conservatives. I never will.Would you vote Tory? Or does that mean you'd vote Lib Dem?
I've never understood this "Labour would be worse" angle. They've not been in power for 12 years. It's like sitting in a house that's on fire and there's a house across the street. It's not visibly on fire, and you don't know what it's like inside, but you'd rather choose to sit and burn than find out what the other one is like.
Leaders have a massive sway on the policies of their party. I still feel guilty when I voted for Blair during his first election. The only regret I will have is not voting for a fantastic Labour MP we have in our local constituency.It is this kind of attitude that will give Tories a win at the next election. Remember you are not voting for Starmer, you are voting for Labour and their approach to supporting and governing the country.
Yeah, about the only reason I’m likely to still vote Labour in spite of the policies Keir puts forward is that I have full faith in my local MP.Leaders have a massive sway on the policies of their party. I still feel guilty when I voted for Blair during his first election. The only regret I will have is not voting for a fantastic Labour MP we have in our local constituency.
360 degrees means you are right where you started. Perhaps you mean 180.Never voted Conservatives. I never will.
Although my life has changed 360 degrees I will never forget my roots. The only time I have not voted for Labour was when Blair turned rogue.
Yes360 degrees means you are right where you started. Perhaps you mean 180.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This just about sums them all up!
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
But why?Reading back to the post that came out wrong.
With a choice purely between Truss, Sunak, and BoJo in the Conservative party. I would take the best of the worst. If Startmer remains the leader I will not vote for Labour for only the 3rd occasion in my life.
I'm not voting or never have voted for the Conservatives.But why?
What do the Conservatives offer that makes them more attractive?
But by not voting Labour because of who heads the party, I don’t quite understand what you’re trying to achieve. You’ve still, indirectly, made the conclusion that supporting labour is worse than the increased risk of a conservative government, ergo effectively supporting conservatives even if you don’t vote for them.I'm not voting or never have voted for the Conservatives.
That question should be directed at the Labour party for making him the leader. I would be disappointed if we get another term of Conservatives but that's the unfortunate part.But by not voting Labour because of who heads the party, I don’t quite understand what you’re trying to achieve. You’ve still, indirectly, made the conclusion that supporting labour is worse than the increased risk of a conservative government, ergo effectively supporting conservatives even if you don’t vote for them.
Not really, it’s rightly directed to you. You might not like Kier, but you’re effectively saying you prefer a conservative government rather than a Kier led Labour government. It makes no sense at all, if your underlying beliefs are left Labour, because even a Kier led Labour Party aligns more to that than a Conservative one. So I still don’t know what you’re achieving.That question should be directed at the Labour party for making him the leader. I would be disappointed if we get another term of Conservatives but that's the unfortunate part.
I have reasons for not agreeing with Keir and its to do with our MP who I know personally and how some on the left of the party were treated. I would rather not go into details.Not really, it’s rightly directed to you. You might not like Kier, but you’re effectively saying you prefer a conservative government rather than a Kier led Labour government. It makes no sense at all, if your underlying beliefs are left Labour, because even a Kier led Labour Party aligns more to that than a Conservative one. So I still don’t know what you’re achieving.
It is also up to a political party to come up with policies and ideas to make people vote for them, rather than criticising voters for choosing an alternative or not going to the polls. Labour has historically been far too keen to do the latter and not the former.I have reasons for not agreeing with Keir and its to do with our MP who I know personally and how some on the left of the party were treated. I would rather not go into details.
Absolutely.It is also up to a political party to come up with policies and ideas to make people vote for them, rather than criticising voters for choosing an alternative or not going to the polls. Labour has historically been far too keen to do the latter and not the former.
I do understand that. And I agree. But there is a bigger picture here. Not voting will lead to a government which is even further away than what you’re looking for. That’s not to say you should flat out vote them no matter what, but it’s also not the right approach to think of it in isolation.It is also up to a political party to come up with policies and ideas to make people vote for them, rather than criticising voters for choosing an alternative or not going to the polls. Labour has historically been far too keen to do the latter and not the former.
I won't be voting Labour at the next election because I think Starmer is shit. If the Tories win the next election, which they probably will, then thats on the Labour leadership.But by not voting Labour because of who heads the party, I don’t quite understand what you’re trying to achieve. You’ve still, indirectly, made the conclusion that supporting labour is worse than the increased risk of a conservative government, ergo effectively supporting conservatives even if you don’t vote for them.