Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
NonceUponATimeInEpsteinAndAndyLand
- Thread starter langster
- Start date
Legend 
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
10/10 for song selection
I know its Project Veritas and James O'Keefe but.......
I like that him being murdered isn't edgy enough to be a conspiracy in this one. I mean it's the most likely scenario.
The real conspiracy is that he's not even dead.
The real conspiracy is that he's not even dead.
Last edited:
it's amazing, and this is rightfully now going to become ammunition for trump in the general.
anyway, interesting about the royal family.
There's been a surprisingly large amount of celebs who have voiced their opinion about the Epstein stuff. I honestly didn't expect the Epstein story to be so widely acknowledged.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Interesting that ABC nixed the Epstein story three years ago, with that being an election year and all
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
obviously that is the most important thing to get at here, well done abc
James O’Keefe and Project Veritas are lying pieces of shit. I’d rather buy a car off Boris than trust a damn word they say.
Without derailing this thread, mine are way to heavy to wear round the house as a slipper.
Holy crap
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Pretty good watch but you just know these feckers will get away with it.
Nice to see Virginia Roberts in a happy relationship, such a brave lady.
Nice to see Virginia Roberts in a happy relationship, such a brave lady.
The extremely rich today live and operate like the nobility did way back in the day(and some continue to do today)...
They always have. It never stopped.
I think that from ca. french revolution and until around 30-40 years ago it was not as ingrained in our governing/law/political/societal systems as it is today. Over time, the number of people with extreme levels of wealth has increased dramatically. If it was just a few people "lording" about and getting away with it, it would be more obvious and easier to handle. But they are now so many that there are elements of safety in numbers in this...
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Did he know him as well?
Andrew is doing a ‘no holds barred’ interview on NewsNight where he supposedly has no advance vetting of the questions. Unless it’s a con job with the palace, then he’s a really stupid man for agreeing to this.
As Ken just mentioned:
Prince Andrew to be quizzed on Epstein in Newsnight special
BBC to broadcast ‘no holds barred’ interview with royal on Saturday night, 9pm
Prince Andrew to be quizzed on Epstein in Newsnight special
BBC to broadcast ‘no holds barred’ interview with royal on Saturday night, 9pm
Guardian said:
No chance it’s no holds barred. I call bullshit.
This, it will be a whitewash publicity fluff piece.
"Your Royal Highness, did you know Jeffrey Epstein?"
"No."
"Goodnight, viewers."
"No."
"Goodnight, viewers."
I could easily believe he has enough contempt for the public to think he could make it all go away by doing this. What I can't believe is that the palace would allow him to be so delusional.
Matlis isn’t exactly Paxman is she?
No holds barred
She'd be given a list of questions she can ask, and Andrew the same so he can practice the answers. Hell somehow come away looking "innocent."
Propaganda.
She'd be given a list of questions she can ask, and Andrew the same so he can practice the answers. Hell somehow come away looking "innocent."
Propaganda.
Complete bullshit. Like the Palace would allow no advanced knowledge.
Yet it took six months of negotiations to organise.
"We're almost there, but Andrew is still not happy with your last draft. Please re-send."Yet it took six months of negotiations to organise.
"Remember Epstein did kill himself"