Is it right only first names are dropping?
NonceUponATimeInEpsteinAndAndyLand
- Thread starter langster
- Start date
I still find it baffling that the police that raided Epstein's house found a safe full of tapes, but didn't want to touch them because of warrant related bs. Quelle surprise, they disappeared shortly. Any truth that was going to come out from this saga disappeared with those tapes
Interested to read more on this. Got a source?
Ten Hag's first real test.
You're just an unimportant pedo.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It'll be released today then? Wednesday right?
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/03/jeffrey-epstein-court-document-names-unsealed-wednesday-.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/03/jeffrey-epstein-court-document-names-unsealed-wednesday-.html
Apparently the hold up is a "Jane Doe 107" and "John Doe 110" filed a motion to have their names taken off for their own personal safety reasons according to twatter anyway.
A former President and his first lady are the rumored pair who won't be named today.
A former President and his first lady are the rumored pair who won't be named today.
That's only the case, because old Jeffrey took the easy way out. Or did he?
The two main culprits were both jailed and the other, a male, was killed in prison.
Other than that it is a fair point.
One side smugly declaring that as the Trumps, the other rabidly declaring it as the Clintons.
can’t be obama as it say “first lady” and not “first mike.”
And how much he has in his bank account because if I was Kimmel, I'd bankrupt the cnut.
Aren't they both already on there?
Clinton is apparently John Doe 36 so no idea who is 107 and110
It's...Rebekah Vardy.
Or they are victims of Epstein who don't want their names publicised?
The court filing for Jane Doe 107 claims she lives in a culturally conservative country outside the US where her name being publicised might lead to her life being in danger.
107 and 110 per LATimes... might give a hint as to who it could be, perhaps.
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-01-03/jeffrey-epsteins-list-of-associates-released
Names of people cited in Jeffrey Epstein court papers to be made public soon
--According to an order released Wednesday by Preska, two Does sought to remain under seal: Doe 107, who cited physical danger in her home country. The Herald agreed to maintain that redaction. The court granted the Doe an extension until Jan. 22 to support their request for remaining under seal.
The second is Doe 110 and is under review by the court, Preska’s order said.
Yet many Does did not object to the release, according to the judge’s order. That group appears to include Clinton, who is identified by news reports as J. Doe 036 and whose name appears in dozens of documents. According to ABC News, many of those documents relate to a battle between the parties over whether Clinton should be called to testify. --
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-01-03/jeffrey-epsteins-list-of-associates-released
Names of people cited in Jeffrey Epstein court papers to be made public soon
--According to an order released Wednesday by Preska, two Does sought to remain under seal: Doe 107, who cited physical danger in her home country. The Herald agreed to maintain that redaction. The court granted the Doe an extension until Jan. 22 to support their request for remaining under seal.
The second is Doe 110 and is under review by the court, Preska’s order said.
Yet many Does did not object to the release, according to the judge’s order. That group appears to include Clinton, who is identified by news reports as J. Doe 036 and whose name appears in dozens of documents. According to ABC News, many of those documents relate to a battle between the parties over whether Clinton should be called to testify. --
Files have apparently come out, website crashed.
So it's out apparently...
so who is on the fecking thing then?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
So far this is as anticlimactic as December 21st, 2012.
Prince Andrew underage sex orgy is the headline the Sun wanted. It says sex with an underage woman on three occasions, so Virginia Guiffre, but then adds a line about an orgy, which seems to be the new bit.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/25231...pstein-released-today-bombshell-court-papers/
Prince Andrew had ‘orgy’ on Epstein’s ‘Paedo Island’ & victim was told ‘give him whatever he wants’, docs claim
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/25231...pstein-released-today-bombshell-court-papers/
Last edited:
Seems a lot of people have been reading this as Hawking being a perv when he wasn't.
https://news.sky.com/story/epstein-court-documents-latest-prince-andrew-among-those-named-13041708
Sorry, late to the party here, so what exactly is this list?
Names who visited his island? Names who used his plane? What does it prove?
I’ve no doubt people will pick the names of people they don’t like and use it to say they’re a pedo but what exactly is the list?
Names who visited his island? Names who used his plane? What does it prove?
I’ve no doubt people will pick the names of people they don’t like and use it to say they’re a pedo but what exactly is the list?
From what I've gathered they are associates, so their interactions with Epstein may vary from met him once, attended a party to exploitation of children. The list of names doesn't prove much other than there was some sort of connection to him. It's the stories that will or should do the damage and so far, the worst I've seen is related to Prince Andrew whose reputation is already in tatters and this only adds to it. I'm not sure you would find any if many arguing his innocence before the list came out and this only adds to most people thoughts on him already.
Right so where is the list, it's just spam of people talking about the list and lying about who is on it.
Which is kinda neat if you're a billionaire associate who owns a website where he can drown out the accusations
Which is kinda neat if you're a billionaire associate who owns a website where he can drown out the accusations
https://news.sky.com/story/epstein-...puppet-and-underage-orgy-allegations-13040654
Some on the list are also accusers, people mentioned in passing or alleged witnesses who have not been accused of anything, so people have to tread carefully a bit.
Ah OK thanks. Actually just listened to a segment on the radio saying what you both have just said.
Seems like it’ll be a bit of a shit show where people see a name they don’t like, and use it to tarnish their reputation.
It is a shit show and I am amazed that the judge realesed it. All it tells us of some names that were known to Epistein and that is pretty much it.
All this does is allow people like Hawking to now be looked at with suspicion. However, this is where Twit(er) rule gets us so I am sure they're all lapping it up and having a semantics debate over who was more of a perv - Clinton or Trump.
So they've named three obvious ones we all knew about in Clinton, Jackson, and Andrew? What a cop out.
So your saying that Stephen Hawking was only theoretically there?
How could Hawkings do it?
Stephen Hawking participating in a orgy is about as believable as Andy claiming he didn't sweat.
He was hacked.
He cheated on his wife with his nurse I believe. His joystick must have been working to some extent.
He probably didn't, but you're all talking about him rather than Trump and the like aren't you?
Oh look, a dead cat!