Heardy
Full Member
Is it right only first names are dropping?
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Interested to read more on this. Got a source?I still find it baffling that the police that raided Epstein's house found a safe full of tapes, but didn't want to touch them because of warrant related bs. Quelle surprise, they disappeared shortly. Any truth that was going to come out from this saga disappeared with those tapes
You're just an unimportant pedo.So what does it mean if your name is on this list?
Absolutely nothing.So what does it mean if your name is on this list?
That's only the case, because old Jeffrey took the easy way out. Or did he?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The two main culprits were both jailed and the other, a male, was killed in prison.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
One side smugly declaring that as the Trumps, the other rabidly declaring it as the Clintons.Apparently the hold up is a "Jane Doe 107" and "John Doe 110" filed a motion to have their names taken off for their own personal safety reasons according to twatter anyway.
A former President and his first lady are the rumored pair who won't be named today.
can’t be obama as it say “first lady” and not “first mike.”One side smugly declaring that as the Trumps, the other rabidly declaring it as the Clintons.
And how much he has in his bank account because if I was Kimmel, I'd bankrupt the cnut.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Here we have Aaron Rodgers publicly accusing Jimmy Kimmel of basically being a sex offender and a pedophile, of course without any evidence. Rodgers is just a massive, massive piece of shit. You have to wonder if he's taken one too many blows to the head.
Aren't they both already on there?One side smugly declaring that as the Trumps, the other rabidly declaring it as the Clintons.
Clinton is apparently John Doe 36 so no idea who is 107 and110Aren't they both already on there?
It's...Rebekah Vardy.Clinton is apparently John Doe 36 so no idea who is 107 and110
Or they are victims of Epstein who don't want their names publicised?Apparently the hold up is a "Jane Doe 107" and "John Doe 110" filed a motion to have their names taken off for their own personal safety reasons according to twatter anyway.
A former President and his first lady are the rumored pair who won't be named today.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Prince Andrew had ‘orgy’ on Epstein’s ‘Paedo Island’ & victim was told ‘give him whatever he wants’, docs claimThe alleged incidents happened "in London (at Ghislaine Maxwell’s apartment), in New York, and on Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands (in an orgy with numerous other under-aged girls)."
https://news.sky.com/story/epstein-court-documents-latest-prince-andrew-among-those-named-13041708Stephen Hawking mentioned by Epstein in email
Jeffery Epstein mentioned astrophysicist Stephen Hawking in a "reward" email to Ghislaine Maxwell (see our 1.27am post).
He said false allegations had been made, including one he described as "the new version in the Virgin Islands that Stephen Hawking participated in an underage orgy".
Mr Hawking was photographed on Epstein's island in March 2006, as part of a trip to a science conference on neighbouring island St Thomas.
The conference was paid for by Epstein and 20 other scientists attended.
From what I've gathered they are associates, so their interactions with Epstein may vary from met him once, attended a party to exploitation of children. The list of names doesn't prove much other than there was some sort of connection to him. It's the stories that will or should do the damage and so far, the worst I've seen is related to Prince Andrew whose reputation is already in tatters and this only adds to it. I'm not sure you would find any if many arguing his innocence before the list came out and this only adds to most people thoughts on him already.Sorry, late to the party here, so what exactly is this list?
Names who visited his island? Names who used his plane? What does it prove?
I’ve no doubt people will pick the names of people they don’t like and use it to say they’re a pedo but what exactly is the list?
Sorry, late to the party here, so what exactly is this list?
Names who visited his island? Names who used his plane? What does it prove?
I’ve no doubt people will pick the names of people they don’t like and use it to say they’re a pedo but what exactly is the list?
https://news.sky.com/story/epstein-...puppet-and-underage-orgy-allegations-13040654US Judge Loretta Preska ruled in December that documents that were part of a 2015 defamation case by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell should be made public.
From what I've gathered they are associates, so their interactions with Epstein may vary from met him once, attended a party to exploitation of children. The list of names doesn't prove much other than there was some sort of connection to him. It's the stories that will or should do the damage and so far, the worst I've seen is related to Prince Andrew whose reputation is already in tatters and this only adds to it. I'm not sure you would find any if many arguing his innocence before the list came out and this only adds to most people thoughts on him already.
https://news.sky.com/story/epstein-...puppet-and-underage-orgy-allegations-13040654
Some on the list are also accusers, people mentioned in passing or alleged witnesses who have not been accused of anything, so people have to tread carefully a bit.
It is a shit show and I am amazed that the judge realesed it. All it tells us of some names that were known to Epistein and that is pretty much it.Ah OK thanks. Actually just listened to a segment on the radio saying what you both have just said.
Seems like it’ll be a bit of a shit show where people see a name they don’t like, and use it to tarnish their reputation.
So your saying that Stephen Hawking was only theoretically there?Seems a lot of people have been reading this as Hawking being a perv when he wasn't.
https://news.sky.com/story/epstein-court-documents-latest-prince-andrew-among-those-named-13041708
He was hacked.Stephen Hawking participating in a orgy is about as believable as Andy claiming he didn't sweat.
He cheated on his wife with his nurse I believe. His joystick must have been working to some extent.How could Hawkings do it?
He probably didn't, but you're all talking about him rather than Trump and the like aren't you?How could Hawkings do it?