africanspur
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 9,233
- Supports
- Tottenham Hotspur
Are there any trophies which Barcelona should not have won in the past 20 years?
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Niemans claims that nobody wants to address him but this was already addressed (and roundly, deservedly mocked) in the previous thread. For example, here.Barcelona from 2001 to 2018 was harmed by arbitration errors, depriving them of winning four leagues (3 against Real Madrid and another with Atlético) and a Copa del Rey that they lost against Mourinho.
Hey, they paid for those titles and didn’t get them!Niemans claims that nobody wants to address him but this was already addressed (and roundly, deservedly mocked) in the previous thread. For example, here.
For people who are not aware, Barcelona won the league in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2018, and 2019. Real Madrid won the league in 2012, 2017, and 2020. Atletico Madrid won the league in 2014. But I really do want to restate it just so people understand what we're dealing with here.
Niemans claims that Barcelona should have won those 3 leagues Real Madrid won, and the one Atletico won. In other words, Barcelona should have won the league every single season from 2008 to 2020. 12 consecutive league titles. Against a club that won the Champions League 4 times in the same period, and another club that reached 2 finals. A feat that hasn't been achieved even in one-club leagues.
When you construct an argument that leads you to such a demented conclusion, it means the argument is wrong. People don't have to go line by line and demolish it. It's just clearly nonsense. The level of entitlement it takes to make an argument like this and expect people to take seriously is awe inspiring.
Wonder of real are involved. That Nani red card still haunts me.
Nope. Only Barca is involved. As previously discussed the Barca-Negreira affair was discovered by the reporter Sique Rodríguez (a Barca fan as you can see by his Twitter profile) from the program Que t'hi jugues from SER Barcelona. In this video Sique admits that they investigated as much as they could to find any leads that would mean other team (specially Real Madrid) was also involved in this affair but they found none.It makes me sad to think of all the corruption that goes on in football
My best guess to any I’ve witnessed is that Nani red card vs Madrid
I know it is a joke but an important part in this affair is that Negreira would withdraw 20k€ monthly in cash during all the years that Barca paid him. Nobody knows, and the police investigation couldn't find, what he did with the money. His exwife said the money didn't reach their household. Proof in this articleThe money was just resting in his account
Funny you say that. According to several articles, although the proof of payments to Negreira can only be traced to 2001, everything points to the fact that this affair started before, during Núñez's presidency.I hope someone similar to the best president in the history of Barcelona returns, in my opinion, may he rest in peace, which was José Luis Núñez.
I guess the Joan Gamper trophies are alright. The rest...Are there any trophies which Barcelona should not have won in the past 20 years?
Awesome argument. Si cuela, cuela.Niemans claims that Barcelona should have won every single season from 2008 to 2020. 12 consecutive league titles. Against a club that won the Champions League 4 times in the same period, and another club that reached 2 finals. A feat that hasn't been achieved even in one-club leagues.
It's a good thing the Glazers are cheap cnuts who don't give a feck about results eh...We’re only just scratching the surface with these corrupt clubs.
If they ever did we can get our own Niemans to explain it all away.It's a good thing the Glazers are cheap cnuts who don't give a feck about results eh...
According to the most recent articles in Spain all this affair was revealed, and the whole investigation started, because Barca tried to deduct the payments they made to Negreira.God bless the Spanish tax man. The final boss of football.
Will be difficult to find the equivalent -- I bet you can barely find on one hand the number of Glazer/Woodward apologists.If they ever did we can get our own Niemans to explain it all away.
Well, that's hypotheses. The facts are as follows:
- Barcelona from 2001 to 2018 was harmed by arbitration errors, depriving them of winning four leagues (3 against Real Madrid and another with Atlético) and a Copa del Rey that they lost against Mourinho.
- With the money paid to Negreira, you can't even buy a half-referee's shoe. They earn a lot and well so that these things do not happen.
- As Iturralde González (former referee) said, 90% of the referees are from Real Madrid and if Negreira had tried to influence them, there would already have been a complaint.
- - The amount that Negreira's son was paid to make arbitration reports is disproportionate, especially during the Laporta era where his money tripled.
Here Laporta has to come out to explain why this amount tripled and for what. It's strange.
From here to see what evidence is provided to clarify the matter.
More than a ****More than a club.
Give all their titles to EspanyolMore than a ****
Niemans claims that nobody wants to address him but this was already addressed (and roundly, deservedly mocked) in the previous thread. For example, here.
For people who are not aware, Barcelona won the league in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2018, and 2019. Real Madrid won the league in 2012, 2017, and 2020. Atletico Madrid won the league in 2014. But I really do want to restate it just so people understand what we're dealing with here.
Niemans claims that Barcelona should have won those 3 leagues Real Madrid won, and the one Atletico won. In other words, Barcelona should have won the league every single season from 2008 to 2020. 12 consecutive league titles. Against a club that won the Champions League 4 times in the same period, and another club that reached 2 finals. A feat that hasn't been achieved even in one-club leagues.
When you construct an argument that leads you to such a demented conclusion, it means the argument is wrong. People don't have to go line by line and demolish it. It's just clearly nonsense. The level of entitlement it takes to make an argument like this and expect people to take seriously is awe inspiring.
Probably refs in their two games against us this year also, especially in that OT game.Was to lazy to read the thread but I presume they paid that ref when they screwed Chelsea I think it was 09
Barca paid around 6 million to person in charge of refs, why do you think they did?The matter is strange and that successive presidents continued with the payments as well. I am interested in knowing the truth and paying the consequences if there are crimes.
I am very tired of the internal political wars between former presidents, the media, in everything that involves Barcelona. The incompetence of others and many more things.
Very tired. I hope someone similar to the best president in the history of Barcelona returns, in my opinion, may he rest in peace, which was José Luis Núñez.
Would have fared better against ChelseaWas to lazy to read the thread but I presume they paid that ref when they screwed Chelsea I think it was 09
ahhh so it is in fact BARCA who are the victim here. of course.Well, that's hypotheses. The facts are as follows:
- Barcelona from 2001 to 2018 was harmed by arbitration errors, depriving them of winning four leagues (3 against Real Madrid and another with Atlético) and a Copa del Rey that they lost against Mourinho.
- With the money paid to Negreira, you can't even buy a half-referee's shoe. They earn a lot and well so that these things do not happen.
- As Iturralde González (former referee) said, 90% of the referees are from Real Madrid and if Negreira had tried to influence them, there would already have been a complaint.
- - The amount that Negreira's son was paid to make arbitration reports is disproportionate, especially during the Laporta era where his money tripled.
Here Laporta has to come out to explain why this amount tripled and for what. It's strange.
From here to see what evidence is provided to clarify the matter.
Yeah have to admit you were totally robbedYou are probably right. Re-living that night in my head just makes me so numb. The ref was just so, so bad. For both sides but undoubtedly we should have had at least 2 clear penalties.
No they weren't.Yeah have to admit you were totally robbed
No one is complaining about it. Iniesta scored a brilliant goal that night and yes like I previously stated, he made bad calls for both teams but it weighed significantly worse for Chelsea across the tie. That was a brilliant Barcelona side whose players will deservedly be looked back on as some of the greatest ever however the politics will now forever tarnish them and their achievements.No they weren't.
Ovrebo was awful. But referee errors were made on both sides.
Robbed was us in 04 against Mourinho's Porto but I don't hear as much whining on that.
And why is a UEFA competition being brought up in a thread about potential La Liga corruption? Are Series A's CL trophies during Calciopoli under doubt too?
Never let a crisis go to waste. Time for the Super League.I see it the opposite way.
La Liga as a competition cannot survive without severely punishing a club that has paid the VP of the Referee Committee for almost 20 years. A minor fine will mean it is ok to cheat in the competition as the consequences of your actions will be negligible and a shadow of doubt will always plague a competition that no one will be able to ever take seriously again.
Sounds a bit conspiracy theory ish to me.No one is complaining about it. Iniesta scored a brilliant goal that night and yes like I previously stated, he made bad calls for both teams but it weighed significantly worse for Chelsea across the tie. That was a brilliant Barcelona side whose players will deservedly be looked back on as some of the greatest ever however the politics will now forever tarnish them and their achievements.
As for your second point, like another poster stated in the other thread on this topic, if they’ve been proven to be corrupt in one competition then who is to say they haven’t done anything in any other competition? It would be completely naive to just rule it out. I must clarify I’m not accusing them of doing so but it should be the natural step in the investigation. How wide is this web of corruption and who else is in on it. UEFA and FIFA have proven track records of corrupt politics during this time so it’s certainly not something we should rule out.
No. I'm saying the opposite of that. I am saying that penal courts require proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt - rightly so - and therefore circumstantial evidence - no matter how obviously guilty it makes them look to the common man - is not enough for conviction - again, rightly soWtf? You are just saying that the herd sentiment is however right and precedes any fair trial and their outcomes, which is laughable in principle and one of the reasons global football is just a gigantic circus nowdays.
And two CL titles to usGive all their titles to Espanyol
Mes que un club. Un club corruptoNiemans claims that nobody wants to address him but this was already addressed (and roundly, deservedly mocked) in the previous thread. For example, here.
For people who are not aware, Barcelona won the league in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2018, and 2019. Real Madrid won the league in 2012, 2017, and 2020. Atletico Madrid won the league in 2014. But I really do want to restate it just so people understand what we're dealing with here.
Niemans claims that Barcelona should have won those 3 leagues Real Madrid won, and the one Atletico won. In other words, Barcelona should have won the league every single season from 2008 to 2020. 12 consecutive league titles. Against a club that won the Champions League 4 times in the same period, and another club that reached 2 finals. A feat that hasn't been achieved even in one-club leagues.
When you construct an argument that leads you to such a demented conclusion, it means the argument is wrong. People don't have to go line by line and demolish it. It's just clearly nonsense. The level of entitlement it takes to make an argument like this and expect people to take seriously is awe inspiring.
They made the payment, did you? So ofcourse they deserve to win those titles too. They deserve the return on investment.Niemans claims that nobody wants to address him but this was already addressed (and roundly, deservedly mocked) in the previous thread. For example, here.
For people who are not aware, Barcelona won the league in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2018, and 2019. Real Madrid won the league in 2012, 2017, and 2020. Atletico Madrid won the league in 2014.
Niemans claims that Barcelona should have won those 3 leagues Real Madrid won, and the one Atletico won. In other words, Barcelona should have won the league every single season from 2008 to 2020. 12 consecutive league titles. Against a club that won the Champions League 4 times in the same period, and another club that reached 2 finals. A feat that hasn't been achieved even in one-club leagues.
When you construct an argument that leads you to such a demented conclusion, it means the argument is wrong. People don't have to go line by line and demolish it. It's just clearly nonsense. The level of entitlement it takes to make an argument like this and expect people to take seriously is awe inspiring.
It's a very strange argument since there is no actual mystery here.Awesome argument. Si cuela, cuela.
All those times Barca fans acted like they had the divine right to win every tournament... Turns out it was just Negreira.
You know, Moggi was cleared (the final sentence https://www.goal.com/en/news/ex-juventus-chief-moggi-a-free-man-following-final/bltab9f23c94ca3c73d ), not acquitted because of reasonable doubt and circumstantial evidence (your film).No. I'm saying the opposite of that. I am saying that penal courts require proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt - rightly so - and therefore circumstantial evidence - no matter how obviously guilty it makes them look to the common man - is not enough for conviction - again, rightly so
It is the great „We hired a hitman but he missed. Therefore we didn’t do anything illegal. Oh, and we want our money back.“ defense.The Barca fan’s entire argument is “we didn’t get our money’s worth”. That’s not a defence.
More than a defense.It is the great „We hired a killer but he missed. Therefore we didn’t do anything illegal. Oh, and we want our money back.“ defense.