Opposition to Saudi Arabian Take Over

Status
Not open for further replies.

momo83

Massive Snowflake
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
1,463
Depends who you ask, I suppose. I see no difference in how israeli and saudi leaders act, tbh. As for the Glazers, they are pro-trump, pro-israeli, zionists, which is as low as you can possibly get, in my book. I didn't turn my back on the club because of them and I won't do it if Saudis take over. Best case scenario for me would be neither had anything to do with the club I love but I don't get to choose that.
The Saudi regime are actually great friends with Trump and Israel.. so it’s like going from having owners who are just fans of what you disagree with to one that is actually friends that sits, eats, and rules the world with them.
 

momo83

Massive Snowflake
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
1,463
What if its a family member and not actually the Head of State himself, that elects to buy Man Utd? would this change people's views?
Honestly. Don’t think Bin Salmon would allow anyone else that glory.
 

R'hllor

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,419
Regardless of what side you on, what i find it weird, is that there are some out there that believe in club being owned by a state or what ever is the only way to compete. or go back to top.
 

AneRu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
3,193
the problem with drawing a moral line on the Saudi regime (which would be fair, because they are terrible) is the fact that line is essentially arbitrary. so yes you can easily argue that being owned by the Saudi State itself is worse than being owned by a Glazer family who supports other repressive regimes (Israel), but you can also argue that they don't need to be of equal terribleness to both be... bad, given the end result ultimately is innocent people dying for religious bullshit. and then there is a further moral slippery slope to a whole host of other activities we either participate in or consume in the West (be it child labour, our carbon foot print, whatever). i can see why the Saudi's would be that final straw for a lot of people, but i can equally see why, just in order to try and attempt to enjoy our life, we have to sometimes separate entertainment and human rights/politics (whilst not ignoring the latter).
Yeah, it's a can of worms and where do we stop. The advantages enjoyed by others, the West in particular, are borne out of two of the worst atrocities ever - slavery and colonialism but we don't see people displaying revulsion over that and demanding that their nations pay reparations. Some of the worst abuses are being done so that old could be extracted, that the latest phones can be made cheaper or that pipeline passes through what used to be a village.

The world over bad things are being done to innocent people so that others get access to resources that we freely consume and ignore the circumstances under which they are made. But we reserve our revulsion for someone being rumored to be interested in a football team forgetting that it is our money that enables him to be in a position to buy Manchester United or order the killing of a journalist.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,426
Location
Birmingham
Regardless of what side you on, what i find it weird, is that there are some out there that believe in club being owned by a state or what ever is the only way to compete. or go back to top.
Especially after we've pissed up nearly a billion pounds.
 

passing-wind

Full Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
3,041
Things get awfully sticky when you start mixing political agenda with the mitigating circumstances that would surround our club's sale. Personally I wouldn't like our owners to have any kind of reputation the Saudis do, it's a disgrace but when it comes to many of the rich there's likely corruption, deceit and other anomalies historically which has been the stem towards their mass financial successes. Much of our public knowledge originates from the media so away from the Saudis, we will never truly know how "clean" any owners hands are.

I wouldn't support the owners but will follow the club. It would be stupid for the Saudis to keep their negative regimes consistent while owning one of the biggest sporting teams in the world, that would just emphasise public disparity and put even more spotlight on their presence in their own country.
 

Gee Male

Full Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2009
Messages
4,318
we as us fans living in liberal western democracies. as opposed to them, the knuckle dragging medieval arabs.
Oh, right.

Well please don't include me in that "us fans" thing there. I have never sent a drone to drop a bunker buster bomb before. You must have based on your post, and I suppose that's a bit mad really.

Nobody representing me has ever done anything like that, including my "western democracy".

Whereas if the Saudi royals buy United, then we would have owners who do, as you put it, behead and hang people they don't like.

Give your head a wobble. The fact that thos is not good news shouldn't be difficult to comprehend.
 

Scotty McT

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
274
That’s my point, sports washing or any type of PR machine they are looking to gain will be totally flawed by further atrocities.

Or are we to believe that once they own United everybody will say ‘oh ok, they own United now, they must be legit.’

Nobody is that naive.

Im not saying it will change their lack of human rights I’m just pointing out that it’s more likely to actually improve it rather than worsen it. I mean in what way would owning United legitimise killing journalists?

Like I said the two points don’t go hand in hand. If they want soft power it will be undermined by further public atrocities.
While you're correct that it'll increase the scrutiny on them, owning United is unlikely to actually have much of effect on whether they chop up another journalist. Besides I'm not interested in holding their hand through this growing up process like they're some sort of psychopathic, murdering two year old.
 

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,907
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
The entire family is bad news.
Honestly. Don’t think Bin Salmon would allow anyone else that glory.
I don't think we should blame or cover an entire family for the actions of its leaders. In regimes like this, family members have been ousted and arrested for falling foul of the top dogs. Unless I know for certain (with proof) that the person who buys Man Utd is not a fit and proper person then I try not to pass too much moral judgement. obviously if Khashoggi buys us its an issue but then I also feel hypocritical as my country welcomes him with open arms irrespective of his crimes. Should I hold my football club to a higher standard than my own country and why?
 

TRUERED89

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Messages
2,366
Location
England
True. People seems to forget that Glazers supports Trump. Did they forget what happen to Palestine? Talking about human rights eh?
Glazers are Israel supporters, full on Palestinian blood on their hands, where’s people’s moral compass with that ? They’re shooting kids daily for no reason ? And our owners support that! Just feck off
 

Big Andy

Bloke
Joined
Oct 23, 2003
Messages
34,696
I'm buying a teatowel for my head in anticipation of the sweet, sweet nectar of Saudi money...

Bye Bye Glazers, hello Mbappe, Messi, Sancho, et al.
 

Eric7C

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
993
Regardless of what side you on, what i find it weird, is that there are some out there that believe in club being owned by a state or what ever is the only way to compete. or go back to top.
The assumption is that such owners would be in it for self promotion and would want to win at all costs, and will therefore appoint the best footballing people going, like City have.

It isn't much to do with money, though that will undoubtedly help.
 

Schmeichel's Cartwheel

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
11,420
Location
Manchester
I wonder how many of the "Well I'd just stop supporting the club" brigade are actually from Manchester? I'm gonna guess none :lol:

United are my local team, I can't remember ever not supporting them, and I couldn't imagine ever not supporting them.

The Saudi government are awful, make no mistake, and I don't want our club associated with a murderous horrific regime, but nothing and nobody will ever stop me supporting my club. Maybe some of you guys should go support Real Madrid or Barcelona?
 

Invictus

Poster of the Year 2015 & 2018
Staff
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
15,282
Supports
Piracy on the High Seas.
What if its a family member and not actually the Head of State himself, that elects to buy Man Utd? would this change people's views?
Depends on why folks are opposed to any potential deals, really...
  • Those with legitimate concerns — who are turned off by the idea of the regime using United as a sort of political tool for soft power and whitewashing-via-sports will probably be ok with an affluent Saudi who's entirely separated from the House of Saud. Though considering the sheer number of inner circle members, things could still be pretty touch and go!

  • Those who are turned off by the idea of “desert people” owning their club will obviously not relent, no point in pretending that these sort don't exist in sufficient numbers (or don't perk up every time these type of threads are created, often under the guise of self-righteousness and uninformed condescension).
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester
People love vague whataboutisms. I had another poster tell me that the owner of my favourite restaurant has probably done "bad things" as well when I spoke against the house of Saud.
They'll be citing the atrocities committed by Colonial Britain next as if that somehow absolves the Saudi's of any wrongdoing.
 

johanovic

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
758
I am no supporter of Saudi Arabia but I love Man Utd. The Glazers have been milking the club and we need a stadium upgrade/new stadium, owners that do put money into the club but do not try to milk it dry and perhaps owners that see the possibilites in buildin up for example a United Hotel next to the ground and so on... Are there many that could be willing to do that? It there perhaps a litte Hypocrisy in how many are claiming they will stop supporting United if the Saudis were the owners? Uk exported goods to Saudi Arabia for 4,2 billion pounds in 2017 in machinery,aircraft,arms and vehicels. Uk imported goods from Saudi for around 2,4 billion pounds and half of that oil plus medical equipment,electrical,photgraphic and so on. Uk exports of service to Saudi Arabia were also 2 billion in 2017 mostly travel services.
I wonder if those claiming a moral highground pump their cars full with Saudi oil each time they fill up? The fact is that UK and Saudis have been in a close relationship for a long time that affects a huge number of Uk compaines and jobs. So that is ok but being owners of United is not ok?
 

AneRu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
3,193
Regardless of what side you on, what i find it weird, is that there are some out there that believe in club being owned by a state or what ever is the only way to compete. or go back to top.
Ordinarily I wouldn't want Manchester United to be someone's toy let alone a brutal state but as far as Manchester United are concerned I view the Glazers and Woodward as a clear and present danger to the prosperity and eventual survival of a club that means so much to me. These guys are the only ones who can afford to and have reportedly shown an interest in spending what's needed to get rid of the deleterious Glazer ownership and their blundering puppet. To me that's important enough to consider.
 

Bestietom

Full Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
8,021
Location
Ireland
At the end of the day we can say and feel what we like or don't like. But the Glazers are not worried who they sell to and we cannot do anything about it. Unless of course we have billions stacked away.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,821
All this is total bollocks I'm afraid. I get that SA is a pretty shady place. But.....

USA illegally invented a reason to go into Iraq and slaughtered thousands of people. Did Iraq once attack or threaten the US? Nope. Did weapons of Mass Destruction ever exist? Nope. I bet you'd have no issues still going to US on holiday though.

1 journalist gets killed and oh the outrage. I'm not condoning their actions one bit but we need to look a bit closer to home too ourselves. We aren't all perfect. We entered into that illegal war with the US too and let's be honest it was for oil.
We're not owned by the US Government though.
 

Scotty McT

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
274
I wonder how many of the "Well I'd just stop supporting the club" brigade are actually from Manchester? I'm gonna guess none :lol:

United are my local team, I can't remember ever not supporting them, and I couldn't imagine ever not supporting them.

The Saudi government are awful, make no mistake, and I don't want our club associated with a murderous horrific regime, but nothing and nobody will ever stop me supporting my club. Maybe some of you guys should go support Real Madrid or Barcelona?
I'd imagine the majority of FC United fans are from Manchester. They stopped supporting the club once the Glazers took over and saddled us with debt. Do you take such a condescending tone with them or is it reserved for people who oppose supporting a vile, murderous regime taking control of the club?

I wouldn't support Real Madrid or Barcelona. I'd likely just stop following professional football altogether.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,821
What the feck wrong with you people! all politicians are corrupted their own way, who the feck cares as long as they will put us back on the right track on and off the pitch? or you would rather wait another 10 fecking years till these cnuts in charge get it right?
Personally, yes, I'd rather wait.
 

TRUERED89

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 23, 2019
Messages
2,366
Location
England
All this is total bollocks I'm afraid. I get that SA is a pretty shady place. But.....

USA illegally invented a reason to go into Iraq and slaughtered thousands of people. Did Iraq once attack or threaten the US? Nope. Did weapons of Mass Destruction ever exist? Nope. I bet you'd have no issues still going to US on holiday though.

1 journalist gets killed and oh the outrage. I'm not condoning their actions one bit but we need to look a bit closer to home too ourselves. We aren't all perfect. We entered into that illegal war with the US too and let's be honest it was for oil.
Great post!!
 

Member 39557

Guest
I am no supporter of Saudi Arabia but I love Man Utd. The Glazers have been milking the club and we need a stadium upgrade/new stadium, owners that do put money into the club but do not try to milk it dry and perhaps owners that see the possibilites in buildin up for example a United Hotel next to the ground and so on... Are there many that could be willing to do that? It there perhaps a litte Hypocrisy in how many are claiming they will stop supporting United if the Saudis were the owners? Uk exported goods to Saudi Arabia for 4,2 billion pounds in 2017 in machinery,aircraft,arms and vehicels. Uk imported goods from Saudi for around 2,4 billion pounds and half of that oil plus medical equipment,electrical,photgraphic and so on. Uk exports of service to Saudi Arabia were also 2 billion in 2017 mostly travel services.
I wonder if those claiming a moral highground pump their cars full with Saudi oil each time they fill up? The fact is that UK and Saudis have been in a close relationship for a long time that affects a huge number of Uk compaines and jobs. So that is ok but being owners of United is not ok?

We don't have a choice in who our government sells arms to. We can however choose not to work for or support companies that fund immoral activities and/or regimes. We can also choose not to support our football club if it get purchased by Saudi Arabia.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,821
No one is advocating for the British government to buy Manchester United.
And thank the lord for that, just imagine Boris and co. in charge of the club. It would make Woodward look like the greatest executive in history.
 

Eckers99

Michael Corleone says hello
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
6,117
So how many innocent people have the British gov murdered ? This may take some time... I'll wait :lol:, and lets not even get started on America.
The British government doesn't own any football clubs, so the comparison is moot.
 

Scotty McT

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
274
Comparing a democracy such as the United States or the United Kingdom to a totalitarian dictatorship like Saudi Arabia is such a false equivalency, and talking about the Iraq War like there weren't worldwide protests against it is such revisionist history.

But believe it or not, I'd also stop supporting United if the US government or Trump bought the club in a clear attempt to increase their soft power. I'd simply start by boycotting one game and keep it up until they're gone. It isn't difficult.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,426
Location
Birmingham
Comparing a democracy such as the United States or the United Kingdom to a totalitarian dictatorship like Saudi Arabia is such a false equivalency, and talking about the Iraq War like there weren't worldwide protests against it is such revisionist history.

But believe it or not, I'd also stop supporting United if the US government or Trump bought the club in a clear attempt to increase their soft power.
The "everybody is bad" argument is a complete nonsense.
 

oggy boy

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
69
Location
Serbia
We don't have a choice in who our government sells arms to. We can however choose not to work for or support companies that fund immoral activities and/or regimes. We can also choose not to support our football club if it get purchased by Saudi Arabia.
Not true. What are elections used for. If there is so called democracy in UK or anywhere else, you have right for your opinion and protests.

Trying to stay "clean" in todays world is almost impossible. I agree that one can and should minimize its harmful actions, but your argument does not stand.

World is hardly black and white, and we can find numerous pro and against arguments for each state/government/company/club/person etc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Scotty McT

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
274
The "everybody is bad" argument is a complete nonsense.
@Mainoldo talking about how the owner of my favourite restaurant is "also bad" was really something else.

If you're born in Saudi Arabia and your father is a Muslim, you're also deemed a Muslim by the state. Pretty flagrant but not the biggest issue in the world in the grand scheme of things. However, leaving the faith is considered a criminal offence with the punishment being death. That's apparently somewhat equivalent to the owner of my favourite restaurant.....underpaying his workers?....not paying all his taxes?... I'm not sure, these people are pretty vague with their false equivalencies.
But you are happy being owned by Amercians who have started more wars than any other nation on earth ?
I already answered this:

Comparing a democracy such as the United States or the United Kingdom to a totalitarian dictatorship like Saudi Arabia is such a false equivalency, and talking about the Iraq War like there weren't worldwide protests against it is such revisionist history.

But believe it or not, I'd also stop supporting United if the US government or Trump bought the club in a clear attempt to increase their soft power. I'd simply start by boycotting one game and keep it up until they're gone. It isn't difficult.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.