- Joined
- Apr 22, 2019
- Messages
- 274
People love vague whataboutisms. I had another poster tell me that the owner of my favourite restaurant has probably done "bad things" as well when I spoke against the house of Saud.Do tell.
People love vague whataboutisms. I had another poster tell me that the owner of my favourite restaurant has probably done "bad things" as well when I spoke against the house of Saud.Do tell.
The Saudi regime are actually great friends with Trump and Israel.. so it’s like going from having owners who are just fans of what you disagree with to one that is actually friends that sits, eats, and rules the world with them.Depends who you ask, I suppose. I see no difference in how israeli and saudi leaders act, tbh. As for the Glazers, they are pro-trump, pro-israeli, zionists, which is as low as you can possibly get, in my book. I didn't turn my back on the club because of them and I won't do it if Saudis take over. Best case scenario for me would be neither had anything to do with the club I love but I don't get to choose that.
The entire family is bad news.What if its a family member and not actually the Head of State himself, that elects to buy Man Utd? would this change people's views?
Honestly. Don’t think Bin Salmon would allow anyone else that glory.What if its a family member and not actually the Head of State himself, that elects to buy Man Utd? would this change people's views?
Yeah, it's a can of worms and where do we stop. The advantages enjoyed by others, the West in particular, are borne out of two of the worst atrocities ever - slavery and colonialism but we don't see people displaying revulsion over that and demanding that their nations pay reparations. Some of the worst abuses are being done so that old could be extracted, that the latest phones can be made cheaper or that pipeline passes through what used to be a village.the problem with drawing a moral line on the Saudi regime (which would be fair, because they are terrible) is the fact that line is essentially arbitrary. so yes you can easily argue that being owned by the Saudi State itself is worse than being owned by a Glazer family who supports other repressive regimes (Israel), but you can also argue that they don't need to be of equal terribleness to both be... bad, given the end result ultimately is innocent people dying for religious bullshit. and then there is a further moral slippery slope to a whole host of other activities we either participate in or consume in the West (be it child labour, our carbon foot print, whatever). i can see why the Saudi's would be that final straw for a lot of people, but i can equally see why, just in order to try and attempt to enjoy our life, we have to sometimes separate entertainment and human rights/politics (whilst not ignoring the latter).
Especially after we've pissed up nearly a billion pounds.Regardless of what side you on, what i find it weird, is that there are some out there that believe in club being owned by a state or what ever is the only way to compete. or go back to top.
Oh, right.we as us fans living in liberal western democracies. as opposed to them, the knuckle dragging medieval arabs.
While you're correct that it'll increase the scrutiny on them, owning United is unlikely to actually have much of effect on whether they chop up another journalist. Besides I'm not interested in holding their hand through this growing up process like they're some sort of psychopathic, murdering two year old.That’s my point, sports washing or any type of PR machine they are looking to gain will be totally flawed by further atrocities.
Or are we to believe that once they own United everybody will say ‘oh ok, they own United now, they must be legit.’
Nobody is that naive.
Im not saying it will change their lack of human rights I’m just pointing out that it’s more likely to actually improve it rather than worsen it. I mean in what way would owning United legitimise killing journalists?
Like I said the two points don’t go hand in hand. If they want soft power it will be undermined by further public atrocities.
The entire family is bad news.
I don't think we should blame or cover an entire family for the actions of its leaders. In regimes like this, family members have been ousted and arrested for falling foul of the top dogs. Unless I know for certain (with proof) that the person who buys Man Utd is not a fit and proper person then I try not to pass too much moral judgement. obviously if Khashoggi buys us its an issue but then I also feel hypocritical as my country welcomes him with open arms irrespective of his crimes. Should I hold my football club to a higher standard than my own country and why?Honestly. Don’t think Bin Salmon would allow anyone else that glory.
Yea, we should be fine if we aint drained by corporate cnuts or run as such.Especially after we've pissed up nearly a billion pounds.
Glazers are Israel supporters, full on Palestinian blood on their hands, where’s people’s moral compass with that ? They’re shooting kids daily for no reason ? And our owners support that! Just feck offTrue. People seems to forget that Glazers supports Trump. Did they forget what happen to Palestine? Talking about human rights eh?
The assumption is that such owners would be in it for self promotion and would want to win at all costs, and will therefore appoint the best footballing people going, like City have.Regardless of what side you on, what i find it weird, is that there are some out there that believe in club being owned by a state or what ever is the only way to compete. or go back to top.
Depends on why folks are opposed to any potential deals, really...What if its a family member and not actually the Head of State himself, that elects to buy Man Utd? would this change people's views?
They'll be citing the atrocities committed by Colonial Britain next as if that somehow absolves the Saudi's of any wrongdoing.People love vague whataboutisms. I had another poster tell me that the owner of my favourite restaurant has probably done "bad things" as well when I spoke against the house of Saud.
Ordinarily I wouldn't want Manchester United to be someone's toy let alone a brutal state but as far as Manchester United are concerned I view the Glazers and Woodward as a clear and present danger to the prosperity and eventual survival of a club that means so much to me. These guys are the only ones who can afford to and have reportedly shown an interest in spending what's needed to get rid of the deleterious Glazer ownership and their blundering puppet. To me that's important enough to consider.Regardless of what side you on, what i find it weird, is that there are some out there that believe in club being owned by a state or what ever is the only way to compete. or go back to top.
We're not owned by the US Government though.All this is total bollocks I'm afraid. I get that SA is a pretty shady place. But.....
USA illegally invented a reason to go into Iraq and slaughtered thousands of people. Did Iraq once attack or threaten the US? Nope. Did weapons of Mass Destruction ever exist? Nope. I bet you'd have no issues still going to US on holiday though.
1 journalist gets killed and oh the outrage. I'm not condoning their actions one bit but we need to look a bit closer to home too ourselves. We aren't all perfect. We entered into that illegal war with the US too and let's be honest it was for oil.
I'd imagine the majority of FC United fans are from Manchester. They stopped supporting the club once the Glazers took over and saddled us with debt. Do you take such a condescending tone with them or is it reserved for people who oppose supporting a vile, murderous regime taking control of the club?I wonder how many of the "Well I'd just stop supporting the club" brigade are actually from Manchester? I'm gonna guess none
United are my local team, I can't remember ever not supporting them, and I couldn't imagine ever not supporting them.
The Saudi government are awful, make no mistake, and I don't want our club associated with a murderous horrific regime, but nothing and nobody will ever stop me supporting my club. Maybe some of you guys should go support Real Madrid or Barcelona?
Personally, yes, I'd rather wait.What the feck wrong with you people! all politicians are corrupted their own way, who the feck cares as long as they will put us back on the right track on and off the pitch? or you would rather wait another 10 fecking years till these cnuts in charge get it right?
Great post!!All this is total bollocks I'm afraid. I get that SA is a pretty shady place. But.....
USA illegally invented a reason to go into Iraq and slaughtered thousands of people. Did Iraq once attack or threaten the US? Nope. Did weapons of Mass Destruction ever exist? Nope. I bet you'd have no issues still going to US on holiday though.
1 journalist gets killed and oh the outrage. I'm not condoning their actions one bit but we need to look a bit closer to home too ourselves. We aren't all perfect. We entered into that illegal war with the US too and let's be honest it was for oil.
I am no supporter of Saudi Arabia but I love Man Utd. The Glazers have been milking the club and we need a stadium upgrade/new stadium, owners that do put money into the club but do not try to milk it dry and perhaps owners that see the possibilites in buildin up for example a United Hotel next to the ground and so on... Are there many that could be willing to do that? It there perhaps a litte Hypocrisy in how many are claiming they will stop supporting United if the Saudis were the owners? Uk exported goods to Saudi Arabia for 4,2 billion pounds in 2017 in machinery,aircraft,arms and vehicels. Uk imported goods from Saudi for around 2,4 billion pounds and half of that oil plus medical equipment,electrical,photgraphic and so on. Uk exports of service to Saudi Arabia were also 2 billion in 2017 mostly travel services.
I wonder if those claiming a moral highground pump their cars full with Saudi oil each time they fill up? The fact is that UK and Saudis have been in a close relationship for a long time that affects a huge number of Uk compaines and jobs. So that is ok but being owners of United is not ok?
And thank the lord for that, just imagine Boris and co. in charge of the club. It would make Woodward look like the greatest executive in history.No one is advocating for the British government to buy Manchester United.
The British government doesn't own any football clubs, so the comparison is moot.So how many innocent people have the British gov murdered ? This may take some time... I'll wait , and lets not even get started on America.
The "everybody is bad" argument is a complete nonsense.Comparing a democracy such as the United States or the United Kingdom to a totalitarian dictatorship like Saudi Arabia is such a false equivalency, and talking about the Iraq War like there weren't worldwide protests against it is such revisionist history.
But believe it or not, I'd also stop supporting United if the US government or Trump bought the club in a clear attempt to increase their soft power.
Not true. What are elections used for. If there is so called democracy in UK or anywhere else, you have right for your opinion and protests.We don't have a choice in who our government sells arms to. We can however choose not to work for or support companies that fund immoral activities and/or regimes. We can also choose not to support our football club if it get purchased by Saudi Arabia.
Honestly. Don’t think Bin Salmon would allow anyone else that glory.
Whataboutism. What clubs do the UK or US government own?So how many innocent people have the British gov murdered ? This may take some time... I'll wait , and lets not even get started on America.
But you are happy being owned by Amercians who have started more wars than any other nation on earth ?I'd instantly stop supporting United if we got taken over by the Saudi state.
For a list of reasons why, see: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2019/country-chapters/saudi-arabia
@Mainoldo talking about how the owner of my favourite restaurant is "also bad" was really something else.The "everybody is bad" argument is a complete nonsense.
I already answered this:But you are happy being owned by Amercians who have started more wars than any other nation on earth ?
Comparing a democracy such as the United States or the United Kingdom to a totalitarian dictatorship like Saudi Arabia is such a false equivalency, and talking about the Iraq War like there weren't worldwide protests against it is such revisionist history.
But believe it or not, I'd also stop supporting United if the US government or Trump bought the club in a clear attempt to increase their soft power. I'd simply start by boycotting one game and keep it up until they're gone. It isn't difficult.