Unlikely lad
Full Member
Anything Stephen King related.
Read really good reviews for "Arrival" and found it incredibly boring.
I saw City of God last year and thought it was brilliant.
I agree about mad max but The wolf is a brilliant film, how can you not see that.Anchorman - about as funny as any other Will Ferrall film.
The Wolf of Wall Street - Boring, overlong, one-note attempt at recreating the greatness of Goodfellas. But intead of a terrific script, flawless direction and Liotta, De Niro, Pesci, Sorvino & Lorraine Bracco on top of their collective game we get bashed over the head repeatedly with hookers & coke and Jonah Hill for 3 hours.
Mad Max: Fury Road: Overblown, cartoonish, characterless bore.
Wtf, one of the best films ever!Fight Club
Face/Off
There Will Be Blood
The Revenant
Dreamgirls
Life Is Beautiful
LaLaLand
Crash
The Departed
Million Dollar Baby
Skyfall
The Shawshank Redemption (decent but not TBFOAT)
The Social Network
Drive
The Thin Red Line
The Shining
Not even as good as the film it copied and more an overacting competition than a film. Hated it.Wtf, one of the best films ever!
Boring? Elba's performance was better than the film itself but it was far from boring.Beasts of no Nation.
One of them films your supposed to like cos its such a powerful story, filmed through the eyes of a child, has that guy from the wire in it and your a heartless git if you don't like it, etc.
Boring rubbish.
Mixed bag there 2001 is pretentious rubbish, I haven't seen the Tree of Life but the three 3 are utterly brilliant.2001 A space Odyssey, Blade Runner, Brazil, Tree of life, Beasts of the Southern Wild.
Agreed. Layers? Enjoyable with decent acting but I have no idea why it tops film lists.I like the film but...what layers?
Be careful, it's a popular film to like.Interstellar. People go on about it as if it's scientific brilliance but the ending was an insult to intelligence.
I hated it. The second half in particular.Be careful, it's a popular film to like.
I think itvwas shit, and am tired of people asking if i 'understand the ending' , like it was difficult to understand.
Hear hear. Thought Departed was shite.Not even as good as the film it copied and more an overacting competition than a film. Hated it.
Arrival on the other hand was a very good film. One of the best sci-fi films in a long time.
Mad Max is garbage. Don't get the hype at all.Agreed, the praise was as over-the-top as the sillier bits of the film.
I didn't think it was rubbish but it was a fun, well done, OTT reboot. Could have lived without it of course.Mad Max is garbage. Don't get the hype at all.
It's the greatest film of all time.2001 is pretentious rubbish
It is utter bollocks. Standard computes goes mad stuff with the ending (and monlith in general) being pure gibberish. Combine that with Kubrick's incapacity to film emotion of any sort makes it truly terrible. It makes Interstellar seem sensible and believable.It's the greatest film of all time.
Pretty much one of the main reasons that puts him ahead of most others.Combine that with Kubrick's incapacity to film emotion of any sort makes
It does? You might as well read a dictionary or a phone book. And at least the end would make sense.Pretty much one of the main reasons that puts him ahead of most others.
Human emotion by definition is pretentious. The few who manage to steer clear deserve recognition.It does? You might as well read a dictionary or a phone book. And at least the end would make sense.
The actual name of the movie is Se7en.When did people start spelling Seven as Se7en??
Nah, that must be a later rebrand, possibly a bluray release or something?The actual name of the movie is Se7en.
Shawshank has layers man. The obvious religious allegory, broad existential themes (Sartrean, Sisyphean most obviously), aesthetics, art and knowledge, symbolism scattered throughout, freedom (physical/metaphysicalyuk!). That's not to comment on the depth, or quality of the layers, but I'd say the film stacks a fair amount together. Personally Paul Newman is my go to prison-yard Christ figure.I like the film but...what layers?
I think when watching a film like this it's important to remember when it was made. Had you seen it back when it came out it would've been ground breaking in its story, copied and made standard since.It is utter bollocks. Standard computes goes mad stuff with the ending (and monlith in general) being pure gibberish. Combine that with Kubrick's incapacity to film emotion of any sort makes it truly terrible. It makes Interstellar seem sensible and believable.
IMO of course.
I think you are reverse engineering stuff into the film that was never there. It is a simple tale. Even simpler than the (great) novella it came from.Shawshank has layers man. The obvious religious allegory, broad existential themes (Sartrean, Sisyphean most obviously), aesthetics, art and knowledge, symbolism scattered throughout, freedom (physical/metaphysicalyuk!). That's not to comment on the depth, or quality of the layers, but I'd say the film stacks a fair amount together. Personally Paul Newman is my go to prison-yard Christ figure.
I did see it when it came out (well not long after it came out).I think when watching a film like this it's important to remember when it was made. Had you seen it back when it came out it would've been ground breaking in its story, copied and made standard since.
That said, it's very boring.
Blasphemy.Drive.
It's a glorified music video.
Only less fun.Drive.
It's a glorified music video.
Stylish? Yes but for me completely lacked any substance. Just a brainless film.. maybe I just don't get the concept. Personally found it a chore.I didn't think it was rubbish but it was a fun, well done, OTT reboot. Could have lived without it of course.
When did that happen? The loved up bit?The most annoying thing about Interstellar for me wasn't the ending, which I liked. It was the braindead stupidity of pretty much every character in the movie.
I don't have much faith in humanity, but I'd like to think if we end up in such a situation we won't risk the future of the human race because we're a bit loved up, or lonely.
Oh and the "love is the answer" bit, obviously.
When Anne Hathaway made the case to go to her boyfriends planet despite everything thinking it was less favourable.When did that happen? The loved up bit?
Ah, well... that's human nature. It would have been odd for her character not to even mention it and we know that her family are a bit... selfish anyway. She should never have been up there in the first place given her emotional ties.When Anne Hathaway made the case to go to her boyfriends planet despite everything thinking it was less favourable.
Yeah. I wouldn't have been so wound up by it if she hadn't made the whole love speech, the was horrific viewing for me!Ah, well... that's human nature. It would have been odd for her character not to even mention it and we know that her family are a bit... selfish anyway. She should never have been up there in the first place given her emotional ties.
Yeah, I was happy with her characters ending.Yeah. I wouldn't have been so wound up by it if she hadn't made the whole love speech, the was horrific viewing for me!
This is like my Freudian interpretation of Peppa Pig.Shawshank has layers man. The obvious religious allegory, broad existential themes (Sartrean, Sisyphean most obviously), aesthetics, art and knowledge, symbolism scattered throughout, freedom (physical/metaphysicalyuk!). That's not to comment on the depth, or quality of the layers, but I'd say the film stacks a fair amount together.
This is like my Freudian interpretation of Peppa Pig.