Okay, so why care about what he thinks, then? Either he's a heavyweight intellectual or he's not.
And obviously he's not.
And obviously he's not.
Jim Jefferies seems quick on his feet. But I guess plenty of comedians are quick on their feet.i genuinely think Jim Jefferies is smarter than Peterson
He is very good at getting to the core of arguments. His gun routine nailed so many of the bullshit arguments around guns for example.i genuinely think Jim Jefferies is smarter than Peterson
I think many really talented comedians are very bright. Bill Burr is another one. Being able to see things in a way that you can cut through them so quickly and decisively, and then to be able to effectively articulate that, is a rare and impressive skilli genuinely think Jim Jefferies is smarter than Peterson
I wouldn’t be too praiseworthy. When he went on Rogan after that clip (few years ago now) he was complaining that they just took that clip to make him look worse. I don’t even think he thought they edited it, just didn’t show 10 minutes before that question or somethingTo be fair, it is actually quite commendable that Peterson concedes when he's wrong in this clip. The vast majority of people do not do so, ever, regardless of the proof put in front of them.
That’s a few years ago nowIs that recent? Peterson looks terrible.
I also think he has spouted the same nonsense after the Jeffries interview in podcasts/interviews with people who refuse to challenge him. He changed his opinion in the Jeffries interview but he quickly reverted to the norm thereafter in more friendly confines.I wouldn’t be too praiseworthy. When he went on Rogan after that clip (few years ago now) he was complaining that they just took that clip to make him look worse. I don’t even think he thought they edited it, just didn’t show 10 minutes before that question or something
I just watched both clips. Jeffries uses logic and reason to dismantle a stance where as Phd Professor Michael Eric Dyson uses racist insults, which would get him banned on the CAF for insulting the person and not the postJim Jeffries, a comedian, was infinitely more effective against Peterson than Phd Professor Michael Eric Dyson
Yeah, Dyson is really terrible at making good arguments without resorting to nonsense.I just watched both clips. Jeffries uses logic and reason to dismantle a stance where as Phd Professor Michael Eric Dyson uses racist insults, which would get him banned on the CAF for insulting the person and not the post
Should of stuck to making vacuum cleanersYeah, Dyson is really terrible at making good arguments without resorting to nonsense.
Criminally Underrated comment. Take a bow son.Cocaine is a stimulant, while benzos are depressants. Might have given Jefferies the edge.
That guy seriously needs to clean his room.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Cool dude
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Furthermore, he could've just not said anything at all. So what if she's not to your liking, just move on.Its kind of weird. The model is absolutely beautiful and you'd need to have a pretty warped view of what humans look like to not recognise that. Its not even fatphobia, its not photo shopped enough phobia
That "warped view" happens to be the dominant view among most humans, which is precisely why overweight people generally don't get anywhere near magazine covers or lead roles as actors in films.Its kind of weird. The model is absolutely beautiful and you'd need to have a pretty warped view of what humans look like to not recognise that. Its not even fatphobia, its not photo shopped enough phobia
she's alright at best lets be honestIts kind of weird. The model is absolutely beautiful and you'd need to have a pretty warped view of what humans look like to not recognise that. Its not even fatphobia, its not photo shopped enough phobia
This.she's alright at best lets be honest
That would've gone against his personality of an attention seeking thundercnut.Furthermore, he could've just not said anything at all.