I know this is going to sound pedantic and petty (as I guess it is), but if our players are not rated & mediocre - why were you so happy with a point, surely with the players you have you should be winning?
We are a "mid table" side, Firmino is "slow", Coutinho is a "one trick pony", our midfield is "rubbish" and our defence "shite".
People have already acknowledged that you have the better team which is different from having better individual player.
The reason you currently have the better team is because your manager has had time to work with his players and get them playing the way he wants. We on the other hand are still going through a transition because we've just had a new boss in charge and he's yet been afforded the time to get the team going the way he wants.
We're 8 games into the season, how did Kloop's team look like after 8 games in charge in the league? Would it have been fair to judge him then?
It doesn't matter how good your players are, if they haven't been gelled together as a team they won't be producing results. Football is a team game and time is needed to get a team working together which you've had plenty but us on the other hand are still very early in our work.