Utd heap
Models for Coin.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2006
- Messages
- 24,498
Utd won 6-0 lads.
You know, the team we all support.
Enjoy your evenings.
You know, the team we all support.
Enjoy your evenings.
Am I the only one who is sick of the way we manage our social media platforms before, during and after matches? The Man United Facebook has posted 24 times since the teamsheet was published and till now. It's like they have gone in complete red alert in order to try to save the narrative of the club.
We playes a team well below our level and anything other than a big victory would be an embarresment. Yet the PR team must be tumbling over each other to push how fantastic a performance it was.
I know that I'm probably just seeing this too much through the perspective of what a terribel state we are in apart from todays match. And maybe this is how most clubs do today to be visible and trying to stay relevant. But almost every bit of communication that is coming from the club makes me feel more and more distanced to the club and how we are profiling ourselves.
“Solshyrer!”Mitre delta ball, everyone absolutely caked in mud, it was a real throwback game of football. It was just missing a bit of Barry Davies on commentary.
I had the same thoughtsStupid cnut
How you managed to spell irrelevant correctly is impressive.We shouldnot ready anything on FA Cups and Leage cups. They are irrelevant.
They arent in the division below us, they are two levels below. We are level 1 they are level 3 on the verge of 4. About 65 teams below us.They are a team on the verge of relegation in the division below us so we can't really take anything from this game other than it was good to see some nice goals, but the way Maguire and Shaw were just running through them time and again tells you what we were playing against.
He used it in the league before, most notably against Liverpool at home, where we almost won. The last time was against Sheffield United in which we got dominated in the first half, and then he abandoned it.Most attacking football we have played this season. Maybe 5 defenders does not mean being defensive. Worth trying the same formation in the Premier League. Might as well try against City first.
That’s because it’s a formation that requires understanding. The wing back have some roles to play for the run etc... it’s not that straight forward. But if it works why not.He used it in the league before, most notably against Liverpool at home, where we almost won. The last time was against Sheffield United in which we got dominated in the first half, and then he abandoned it.
How you managed to spell irrelevant correctly is impressive.
They arent in the division below us, they are two levels below. We are level 1 they are level 3 on the verge of 4. About 65 teams below us.
How you managed to spell irrelevant correctly is impressive.
"You take the penalty"Perreira and Lingard debating.
I have "Dumb and dumber" movie in my head now.
He used it in the league before, most notably against Liverpool at home, where we almost won. The last time was against Sheffield United in which we got dominated in the first half, and then he abandoned it.
Most attacking football we have played this season. Maybe 5 defenders does not mean being defensive. Worth trying the same formation in the Premier League. Might as well try against City first.
I'd scratch everything from this match, it's tranmere
What works well against tranmere will not translate 1:1 if you use it against City.
You can play any sort of formation against tranmere and it'll look good.
Credit where it is due. Wasn't sure that we needed the 5 defenders albeit two playing as wing backs, still feel it wasn't totally necessary. Was also unsure of playing certain players on that pitch with our current injury issues. Gladly they came through unscathed.
It was a good result regardless of who we played against. It was a professional performance, we scored some cracking goals with some interesting scorers and I'm happy we won.
![]()
In the first leg of the CashCow Cup at OT, City played a 5-5-0 formation with no out and out strikers. They attacked us relentlessly and we couldn’t get at them at all.Most attacking football we have played this season. Maybe 5 defenders does not mean being defensive. Worth trying the same formation in the Premier League. Might as well try against City first.
How about a 4th round 0-0 draw at League 2 Cambridge Utd, the year they dodged relegation to non-league by only 10 points? That was the same season we got pumped 4-0 at MK Dons. People forget how back things were at times under LVG.Games like this with opponents as poor as Tranmere ? I highly doubt it
So, we have turned a corner and will now be competitive in the league?
Yeah Watford thought that too.I'd scratch everything from this match, it's tranmere
What works well against tranmere will not translate 1:1 if you use it against City.
You can play any sort of formation against tranmere and it'll look good.
Isnt it similar to the Rochdale game then? Why didnt any formation look good then?
So you're saying 352 with jones in the middle is the new dawn, because we beat tranmere 6 - 0 with it?
Come next game we shall see..we shall see
Games like this with opponents as poor as Tranmere ? I highly doubt it
No, you are putting words into what I said. We have tried it on numerous times this season and it hasn't worked V Wolves and SU.
The fact that Jones was destroyed by a League 1 striker shows what level he is at.
However; if you look at this team, where have we got numbers? CB and Full back.
We do not have any real fit wingers either to play any formation that includes wingers.
5-3-2 works because it allows Martial to drop and Greenwood to occupy spaces.
This works because of who we have available, obviously with a fully fit squad it wouldn't be my preference.
Lee Mason