Utd heap
Models for Coin.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2006
- Messages
- 21,584
Awful, awful song.Good turnout.
Wish we'd stop with the Sun was right stuff when we play Liverpool though
Awful, awful song.Good turnout.
Wish we'd stop with the Sun was right stuff when we play Liverpool though
You can't see the back of the coach until its gone past...fecking idiots.. its got the Manc “worker bee” signage, is called Beeline and even had ‘Manchester’ written on the back. Couldn’t be anymore obvious it wasn’t a Liverpool coach FFS
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It is but have you ever been to Anfield and heard the songs about Munich?Awful, awful song.
Err nearly 3 years on mate, but what the hell are you blaming them for ? As they don't own SKY, Comcast backers of Biden and the far left do, Sky was sold off a few years back mate.I tried listening and they clearly dampened it down most of the time. They only want to show the fans protesting when their production calls for it. Murdoch scum.
Sorry but the far leftErr nearly 3 years on mate, but what the hell are you blaming them for ? As they don't own SKY, Comcast backers of Biden and the far left do, Sky was sold off a few years back mate.
Comcast are not that much better and the culture at Sky doesn't seem to have changed.Err nearly 3 years on mate, but what the hell are you blaming them for ? As they don't own SKY, Comcast backers of Biden and the far left do, Sky was sold off a few years back mate.
https://news.sky.com/story/victory-...s-anger-at-manchester-uniteds-owners-12679578
You can see all the Bee shit though… and why would a Liverpool coach be going past the Tollgate?You can't see the back of the coach until its gone past...
I didn't really pay much attention at the time. Seemed like a few stray cans, pretty shit for the kids on the bus so it shouldn't have happened but it was no real drama.You can see all the Bee shit though… and why would a Liverpool coach be going past the Tollgate?
I know it’s just crowd mentality. One hepped up guy probably started it and everyone joined in without thinking, but it’s still pretty fecking shit we threw a bunch of bottles at a United coach full of kids. Ignoring it doesnt win us anything.
Biden!??! I knew it was him! Even when it was the bears I knew it was him.As they don't own SKY, Comcast backers of Biden and the far left do, Sky was sold off a few years back mate.
https://news.sky.com/story/victory-...s-anger-at-manchester-uniteds-owners-12679578
I couldn't tell ya mate as got rid of them a few years backs when I got myself a high quality source of different rivers, as way too much money to be handed out only to be spoken to like a child by their news anchors and pundits.Comcast are not that much better and the culture at Sky doesn't seem to have changed.
Err nearly 3 years on mate, but what the hell are you blaming them for ? As they don't own SKY, Comcast backers of Biden and the far left do, Sky was sold off a few years back mate.
https://news.sky.com/story/victory-...s-anger-at-manchester-uniteds-owners-12679578
Err nearly 3 years on mate, but what the hell are you blaming them for ? As they don't own SKY, Comcast backers of Biden and the far left do, Sky was sold off a few years back mate.
https://news.sky.com/story/victory-...s-anger-at-manchester-uniteds-owners-12679578
Err nearly 3 years on mate, but what the hell are you blaming them for ? As they don't own SKY, Comcast backers of Biden and the far left do, Sky was sold off a few years back mate.
https://news.sky.com/story/victory-...s-anger-at-manchester-uniteds-owners-12679578
I suppose its because that happened inside the stadium whereas this protest is outsideThe coverage has been pretty shocking tbf. We got more traction when Beckham picked up a green & gold scarf 10 years ago.
If Ronaldo is off, he could’ve won back the fanbase in a single swoop by copying it. It would at least have completed their vague career path symmetry…
Someone should get on that. And bring back the scarves. Throw one at his car or something.
Wow, you really are a great example of someone got full member status way too soon, as a lot of your posts are just emojs, or txt words, which I thought were banned on this site, but then saw your copy/paste twitter post in the russia thread where you were backing russians and when challenged on it, you refused to answer it or hmm, didnt have a clue how to.
I'll bite, little one.Wow, you really are a great example of someone got full member status way too soon, as a lot of your posts are just emojs, or txt words, which I thought were banned on this site, but then saw your copy/paste twitter post in the russia thread where you were backing russians and when challenged on it, you refused to answer it or hmm, didnt have a clue how to.
Indeed. Which is why all the boycott stuff - as unrealistic as it is (and always was) - has at least the germ of the right idea. We need something to happen in stadium, in front of the TV cameras, that’s visibly and unavoidably embarrassing for the management as well as a mainstream show of fan solidarity… Unfortunately I can’t think what that wouldn’t be opposed by some large section of the fanbase, or isn’t just bringing back the scarves!I suppose its because that happened inside the stadium whereas this protest is outside
Something like this has been mentioned before and could be acheivable, although Im guessing there are less security searches at The Valley than Old TraffordIndeed. Which is why all the boycott stuff - as unrealistic as it is (and always was) - has at least the germ of the right idea. We need something to happen in stadium, in front of the TV cameras, that’s visibly and unavoidably embarrassing for the management as well as a mainstream show of fan solidarity… Unfortunately I can’t think what that wouldn’t be opposed by some large section of the fanbase, or isn’t just bringing back the scarves!
Firstly. Sorry that your day out was spoilt.Can I just ask what about the fans who don't want to protest and don't want their match-day's spoiled by having to fight their way into OT, or to miss half the game because others are bobbing up and down shouting "Stand up against the Glazers"? Do we have platform?
I don't doubt that the vast majority of fans are not happy with the Glazer's as owners of the club, (I'm not either) but I don't want to ruin my football day/evening etc. worrying about who owns the bloody club...! I want to see what we saw last night commitment and courage and endeavor its always been the players and manager who provide the spectacle, the magic of the 'Theatre of Dreams'....who owns the club is not important.
Manchester United is now a multi-billion pound entity and its naivety in the extreme to believe that a 'cash cow' like it now is will not fall prey to the likes of the Glazers . There is only one way to protest effectively that is to stop giving them your money, then maybe , just may be they will sell up and we can wait for the next 'carpet-bagger' owner to arrive.
In my opinion 'aggressive' protests are to be used only for something important (and then sparingly)... to protest against wars, death, disease, abject poverty, inhumanity, not against who owns a football club. Before someone tells me these are peaceful protests, I say 'pull the other one' massed crowds threatening, among other things to kill named individuals is not peaceful, at least not in my book.
Fans already have a say in the club, if they don't like it, then stop buying merchandise, stop going to games, stop supporting , quite a few did this when FC United was born.
Does anyone really believe a group of fans as dispersed, as disparate, as disagreeing over who plays for United, and in what position, on the systems of transfer (as well as the systems of play) etc. as United supporters are, could ever be involved in the direct running of the club?
I know lots of contributors on the red cafe will be mighty upset with me, call me names, 'Glazer fan -boy' (some of the more acceptable comments I'm sure), but really I am not. I have no love for the predator likes of the Glazers whatsoever, but I am old enough to realise there is 'no shutting the barn door after the horse has bolted' and when Martin Edwards turned the club from a 'family hobby' to a 'family business' that's exactly what happened... there is no going back!
(*Incidentally I am not angry with Martin Edwards, he did bring us SAF and I am sure thought he was doing the best thing at the time....but as we all know the road to hell is paved with good intentions!)
What would a current Tory voter sound like if they were a United fan, example one.Can I just ask what about the fans who don't want to protest and don't want their match-day's spoiled by having to fight their way into OT, or to miss half the game because others are bobbing up and down shouting "Stand up against the Glazers"? Do we have platform?
I don't doubt that the vast majority of fans are not happy with the Glazer's as owners of the club, (I'm not either) but I don't want to ruin my football day/evening etc. worrying about who owns the bloody club...! I want to see what we saw last night commitment and courage and endeavor its always been the players and manager who provide the spectacle, the magic of the 'Theatre of Dreams'....who owns the club is not important.
Manchester United is now a multi-billion pound entity and its naivety in the extreme to believe that a 'cash cow' like it now is will not fall prey to the likes of the Glazers . There is only one way to protest effectively that is to stop giving them your money, then maybe , just may be they will sell up and we can wait for the next 'carpet-bagger' owner to arrive.
In my opinion 'aggressive' protests are to be used only for something important (and then sparingly)... to protest against wars, death, disease, abject poverty, inhumanity, not against who owns a football club. Before someone tells me these are peaceful protests, I say 'pull the other one' massed crowds threatening, among other things to kill named individuals is not peaceful, at least not in my book.
Fans already have a say in the club, if they don't like it, then stop buying merchandise, stop going to games, stop supporting , quite a few did this when FC United was born.
Does anyone really believe a group of fans as dispersed, as disparate, as disagreeing over who plays for United, and in what position, on the systems of transfer (as well as the systems of play) etc. as United supporters are, could ever be involved in the direct running of the club?
I know lots of contributors on the red cafe will be mighty upset with me, call me names, 'Glazer fan -boy' (some of the more acceptable comments I'm sure), but really I am not. I have no love for the predator likes of the Glazers whatsoever, but I am old enough to realise there is 'no shutting the barn door after the horse has bolted' and when Martin Edwards turned the club from a 'family hobby' to a 'family business' that's exactly what happened... there is no going back!
(*Incidentally I am not angry with Martin Edwards, he did bring us SAF and I am sure thought he was doing the best thing at the time....but as we all know the road to hell is paved with good intentions!)
Can I just ask what about the fans who don't want to protest and don't want their match-day's spoiled by having to fight their way into OT, or to miss half the game because others are bobbing up and down shouting "Stand up against the Glazers"? Do we have platform?
I don't doubt that the vast majority of fans are not happy with the Glazer's as owners of the club, (I'm not either) but I don't want to ruin my football day/evening etc. worrying about who owns the bloody club...! I want to see what we saw last night commitment and courage and endeavor its always been the players and manager who provide the spectacle, the magic of the 'Theatre of Dreams'....who owns the club is not important.
Manchester United is now a multi-billion pound entity and its naivety in the extreme to believe that a 'cash cow' like it now is will not fall prey to the likes of the Glazers . There is only one way to protest effectively that is to stop giving them your money, then maybe , just may be they will sell up and we can wait for the next 'carpet-bagger' owner to arrive.
In my opinion 'aggressive' protests are to be used only for something important (and then sparingly)... to protest against wars, death, disease, abject poverty, inhumanity, not against who owns a football club. Before someone tells me these are peaceful protests, I say 'pull the other one' massed crowds threatening, among other things to kill named individuals is not peaceful, at least not in my book.
Fans already have a say in the club, if they don't like it, then stop buying merchandise, stop going to games, stop supporting , quite a few did this when FC United was born.
Does anyone really believe a group of fans as dispersed, as disparate, as disagreeing over who plays for United, and in what position, on the systems of transfer (as well as the systems of play) etc. as United supporters are, could ever be involved in the direct running of the club?
I know lots of contributors on the red cafe will be mighty upset with me, call me names, 'Glazer fan -boy' (some of the more acceptable comments I'm sure), but really I am not. I have no love for the predator likes of the Glazers whatsoever, but I am old enough to realise there is 'no shutting the barn door after the horse has bolted' and when Martin Edwards turned the club from a 'family hobby' to a 'family business' that's exactly what happened... there is no going back!
(*Incidentally I am not angry with Martin Edwards, he did bring us SAF and I am sure thought he was doing the best thing at the time....but as we all know the road to hell is paved with good intentions!)
Great stuff!I had talksport on earlier and they stated there's expected to be more protests, was glad that news outlets haven't brushed it under the carpet despite the result.
To be fair.. and this is just me bragging.... They could just NOT throw cans of beer at a bus.You can't see the back of the coach until its gone past...
I wasnt suggesting otherwiseTo be fair.. and this is just me bragging.... They could just NOT throw cans of beer at a bus.
,I'm not upset with you for one.
You are simply ignorant of the facts.
Who's Joel???Afternoon Joel mate.
Now then! ...no need for name calling!What would a current Tory voter sound like if they were a United fan, example one.
Glazers are not screwing over Bucs' fans.That video by Sam from United Peoples should be a TV ad playing everywhere there’s a sizeable United fanbase, and local Tampa tv - might start stirring up the Bucaneer’s fans as well when they realize how the Glazers are screwing over fans of both teams.