Yep, most top managers would choose a striker who scored 10 goals per season over an another who scores 40 and who has showed himself in multiple leagues, World Cup and South American Cup.
And then we laugh at RAWK for their mass delusion.
First you claim you would pick Utd just because of Pogba, then you try to discount Pogba just so you can choose PSG and not look stupid.
You're going out of your way to pick PSG no matter what, its fascinating to see.
I dont think I've argued that Rashford has had a better career at 21 than Cavani has had 31 but thanks for that I guess?
If that's the game you play then I can play the Rashford has shown more at 21 than Cavani did at that age but whats the point? I'm talking the here and now.
Its why you're focusing on the one player because your argument does not stack up.
Cavani hasn't the pace or dynamic ability to play along the front line for Utd that would suit Pogba the way Rashford is now. That blistering pace and ability to go past a player would be gone which would affect the way Pogba can get forward. Cavani is 31 after all.
He wouldn't drift to allow Lingard or Pogba to run in behind but he would score more goals for us because he's a box player.
Its the same problem we seem to have with Sanchez. Even when the Chilean plays well and scores v Arsenal we still have the majority of fans wanting Rashford to play v Burnley because that goal and good play isn't enough for our side anymore. Hell Lukaku is productive again yet we want him on the bench because goals and assists can't make up for what we would lose without Marcus.
Isn't that a fair tradeoff?
We have more creativity through the middle that PSG.
Martial would start for them them without Neymar while Lingard and Pogba provide that threat and creativity though the middle which PSG doesnt have.
Our attack has more variation to it.
