JmRssll555
Full Member
What has he done in the past 8 years to be considered as "one of the best" managers? We've seen a few other top level managers emerge in Europe in that period who I would suggest are all considered to be "better" than Wenger now - for example, Mourinho, Klopp, Blanc and Guardiola. I know they have all achieved success at huge clubs but I think Arsenal under Wenger used to be considered as part of that elite and now they no longer are. You have to attribute that down to the manager, both in terms of his player purchases and his tactics at times.Perception by whom? The biased rival fans, the sensational media or the self proclaimed experts? From a neutral or objective perspective (be it my own or everybody I personally know who follows the EPL) the opinion of Wenger has not really changed over the years. Over here in Germany Arsene Wenger is still seen as one of the best managers and certainly one of the most respected ones in Europe. The reputation he enjoys is also justified.
Given the clear differences in spending power to the three top dogs and the loss of several key players, managing to always be in range of the CL places is a respectable feat. That some used the lack of (unrealistic) trophies to make fun of him and the club does not change that.
I would compare the rise and fall of Wenger's reputation to that of Torres - yes, each are still generally held to be very good at what they do. However, neither are still held in the same esteem as they once were, when each may have staked a claim to be one of the best in the world in their respective jobs.
Therefore, I would counter that it isn't biased rival fans, or the sensationalist media, but rather the average football fan who perceives Wenger not to be nearly as effective as he used to be.
I'm enjoying this discussion, but wary that we take this thread too far off topic. Feel free to quote me in some other thread where it may be more relevant.